Advanced Search Results

Chief of the Army Staff and Others Vs. Laxman Giri, Ex Havaldar No. 92 ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 108, 116 and 120 - Rule 130; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC716; [2000(85)FLR76]; (2000)1UPLBEC868

culminate but had begun on a complaint of Raghav Singh, a Sepoy, making allegations under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The complaint was, to the effect, that the petitioner, Laxman Girl, a non-commissioned officer, had assaulted or used … conduct unbecoming of a gentleman, may be convicted by court martial or cashiered. This is so provided in Section 45 of the Army Act, 1950.7. What the petitioner, Laxman Girt, as Havaldar, did to the wife of a

M. Balasubramanian Vs. the Inspector of Police and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) - Section 477A, 468, 471, 420, 71; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), - Section 428, 30(1)(b), 31

one trial of two or more offences, the court may, subject to the provisions of section 71 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), sentence him for such offences, to the several punishments, prescribed therefore which such court is

Onkar Moatiram Kale and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 326; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 165

Reported in : 2001(5)BomCR297; 2001CriLJ4375

appeal is accordingly allowed to the aforesaid extent. Criminal - appeal - Sections 34, 302 and 326 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 45 and 59 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 165 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973

Mahmood Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 452; Evidence Act - Sections 45 ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 452; Evidence Act - Sections 45

Reported in : AIR1976SC69; 1976CriLJ10; (1976)1SCC542; 1975(7)LC875(SC)

conviction of the appellant and acquitted him. Criminal - circumstantial evidence - Sections 34, 302 and 452 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 5 of Identification of Prisoners Act - appeal challenging conviction under Sections 452 and 302 read … bald and dogmatic opinion of such a person, even if such opinion is assumed to be admissible under Section 45, Evidence Act. 18. In the light of the above discussion, we are of the view that the solitary

The State (Delhi Administration) Vs. Pali Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 60, 63 and 207A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420, 467, 471 and 477A; Evidence Act - Sections 45, 47, 73, 114 and 165;

Reported in : AIR1979SC14; 1979CriLJ17; (1979)2SCC158; [1979]1SCR931; 1978 Cri LJ 17

taken with utmost expedition. Criminal - power of Courts - Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 471 and 477-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 60, 63 and 207-A of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 45, 47, 73, 114 and 165 … 'admitted writings' within the purview of the first paragraph of the Section which read with illustration (c) of Section 45, Evidence Act, clearly indicates that such specimen writings can legally be used for comparison with the disputed writing

Naib Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 320, 324 and 326; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45

Reported in : AIR1986SC2192; 1987(35)BLJR166; 1986CriLJ2061; JT1986(1)SC511; 1986(2)SCALE476; (1986)4SCC401; 1986(2)LC620(SC)

raises a question whether the appellant was guilty of having committed an offence punishable under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 or under Section 324. That would depend on whether cutting of bone without more amounts to fracture within … no special training or education in Radiology, could not be regarded as an expert within the meaning of Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872. We are afraid, we cannot accept this line of reasoning.5. There can be

Gopal Vinayak Godse Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4, 4(1), 99A, 99A(1), 99B, 99C, 99D, 99E, 99F, 99G, 179 and 342; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(5), 19(6), 32, 226, 226(1A), 227 and 311(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A, 153A and 295A; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 29 and 29(2); Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Constitution of India (Fifth Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 8; Punjab Special Powers (Press) Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 3; Marwar Land Revenue Act, 1949 - Sections 86; High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rule 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1922; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1971Bom56; (1970)72BOMLR871; 1971CriLJ324

hatred between Hindus and Muslims in India and the publication of which is punishable under Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code 1860, (Act XLV of 1860). Now, therefore, on the ground that the book contains passages, references to which are … Muslims in India and the publication of which is punishable under Section 153-A of the I.P.C. 1860 (Act XLV of 1860). Now therefore, on the above stated grounds and in exercise of the powers conferred by Section

Parkash Singh Badal and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7 to 11, 12, 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4) and 24; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 71, 72, 120B, 161 to 165A, 405, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 41(1), 154, 154(1), 154(3), 155, 155(2), 155(3), 155(4), 156, 156(1), 156(3), 157, 157(1), 157(2), 158, 161, 170, 173, 173(2) to 173(6), 173(8), 190, 193, 196, 197, 197(1), 197(2), 212(2), 219(1), 215, 220, 260, 262 to 265 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1969; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882 - Sections 154; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Secti

Reported in : AIR2007SC1274; 2007(3)ALD8(SC); JT2007(1)SC89; 2006(13)SCALE54; (2007)1SCC1; 2007AIRSCW115; (2007)1SCC(Cri)193; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)142; 2007(1)KLJ497; 2007(2)KCCRSN92.; MANU/SC/5415/2006

questioning the validity of proceedings initiated under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the 'Act') and/or the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). In the latter category of cases the question raised is either lack of sanction … 'IPC'). In the latter category of cases the question raised is either lack of sanction in terms of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code') or the legality thereof.3. It is … not exceeding two thousand rupees whether or not any order under Section 452 of the said Code is made in addition to such sentence, but

Jai Prakash Alias Guddu vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct) of New Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

accused therein i.e the present appellant was convicted thereby for the commission of the offences punishable under Sectionof the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”), 1860.2. The trial court record indicates that the charge of allegations framed against … CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. An appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Cr.P.C.,1973 has been instituted by the appellant Jai Prakash @ Guddu son of Sh.

Abdul Nassar versus State of Kerala & Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.1

Report issued by Asst. Engineer, PWD Building Section, Nilambur Ex. P-9 Report incorporating the offence under S. 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) Ex. P-10 Seizure Mahazar Ex. P-11 First Information Report Ex. P-12 Potency Certificate Ex. P-13 Examination report … the findings of the experts. Thus, these reports do not meet the standards of expert evidence enumerated under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. 11.9 That it is a settled position of law that the accused