Advanced Search Results

Akhaya Behera Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 427, 427(1) and 428; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392, 395, 441, 442, 443, 444, 456 and 457

Reported in : 1996CriLJ334

the learned Assistant Session Judge, Jagatsinghpur on the accusation of having committed offences punishable under Sections 457/395/392 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, 'IPC'), and under Section 9(b) of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 (in short, the 'Explosives Act'). … was committed in order to the committing of any offence punishable with imprisonmment. 'Lurking house-trespass' is defined in Section 443, IPC, while 'lurking house-trespass by night' is defined in Section 444. The said section provides that whoever commits

Subhash Baliram Savaskar Vs. Solapur Municipal Corporation and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

under sections 166, 201, 202, 204, 217, 298, 379, 381, 408, 409, 420, 34 and 120 (b) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The crux of the allegations in the said FIR was that 5 files concerning the Land and Estate … and Ors. reported in 2000 (1) Mh L.J. 519: 1999(4) ALL MR 443. For all the aforesaid reasons, Mr Killedar submitted that the Writ Petition … an end and/or ceases to operate with effect from 19th March, 2014 in view of proviso (b) to section 56 (1) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act (hereinafter referred to as “the MMC Act”). As a consequence

Shri Walayati Singh vs State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

by the prosecution, to submit that the charge under section 109(1) of BNS (corresponding to Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”]) was not made out against them. They submitted that, at best, the present petitioners, even according to … .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 427/2026 GURCHARAN SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 443/2026 SHRI WALAYATI SINGH .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentAppearances: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Gurcharan Singh vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

by the prosecution, to submit that the charge under section 109(1) of BNS (corresponding to Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”]) was not made out against them. They submitted that, at best, the present petitioners, even according to … .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 427/2026 GURCHARAN SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 443/2026 SHRI WALAYATI SINGH .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentAppearances: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Gurmeet Singh vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi .

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

by the prosecution, to submit that the charge under section 109(1) of BNS (corresponding to Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”]) was not made out against them. They submitted that, at best, the present petitioners, even according to … .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 427/2026 GURCHARAN SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 443/2026 SHRI WALAYATI SINGH .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentAppearances: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Rajveer Singh vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

by the prosecution, to submit that the charge under section 109(1) of BNS (corresponding to Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”]) was not made out against them. They submitted that, at best, the present petitioners, even according to … .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 427/2026 GURCHARAN SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 443/2026 SHRI WALAYATI SINGH .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentAppearances: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Shrichand Rajaram Kukreja and Anr. versus the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]5S.C.R.696

the FIR No. 443 of 2015 1 registered with MIDC Walunj Police Station, Aurangabad for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2 4. Since both the … MIDC Walunj Police Station, Aurangabad for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2 4. Since both the appeals arise out of a common order dated 8th October, 2018, passed by

Nagesh Devadiga Alias Nagesh and ors. Vs. the State Rep by the Police ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 324, 325, 326, 307, 302, 34; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 482, 209, 207, 439, 443

Reported in : 2012(3)KCCR2152

would be a technical formality. Therefore, the petition is disposed of with the above observations. [A.S. PACHHAPURE, J.] Indian Penal Code, (IPC) 1860 - Sections 324, 325, 326, 307, 302, 34; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections … discretion to call upon the petitioners to offer sufficient sureties by passing an appropriate Order as contemplated under Section 443 Cr.P.C. But, anyhow, as the Magistrate had taken the bail bonds only for the appearance by the petitioners

Hemant and Others Vs. State NCT of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

endorsement directing a case to be registered for investigation into offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 307/34 IPC of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( IPC ?) and for the investigation to be handed over to Inspector Alka Azad (PW17), the Additional … PM, the SHO made an endorsement directing a case to be registered for investigation into offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 307/34 IPC of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( IPC ?) and for the investigation to be handed … context that in P.V. Radhakrishna Vs. State of Karnataka 2003 (6) SCC 443, the Supreme Court observed that dying declaration like any other piece of

Kishanlal Singh and Four ors. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 443, 445 and 457

Reported in : 1986(I)OLR386

Court of Mr. S. S. Sahani, Assistant Sessions Judge, Baripada, being charged under Sections 457 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code (for short the 'Code'). The appellants and the other culprits, it was alleged, committed house-breaking by entering into … order of conviction recorded against the appellants under Section 457 of the Code cannot be sustained in law. Section 443 of the Code defines lurking house-trespass and Section 445 of the Code defines house-breaking. In the instant case