Advanced Search Results
Pramod Kumar Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-19-2008
Constitution
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Prisons Act, 1894; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 2005; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 436A and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409 and 420; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 20, 21, 32 and 142
IV(2008)BC505(SC); 2008CriLJ4697; [2009(1)JCR79(SC)]; 2008(12)SCALE623; (2008)9SCC685; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(9)SCC685; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528
different States for commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and also under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.5. According to the petitioner, there is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMirza Yusuf Baig Vs. State by Chitguppa Police
Karnataka
Jun-04-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 415, 420 and 468; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197
2008(5)KarLJ649
J.1. The petitioner/accused 2 is convicted for an offence punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and is sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of two months and to pay a fine of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChaman Lal and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-31-2009
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120A, 120B, 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173 and 205(2)
AIR2009SC2972; 2009(57)BLJR1529; JT2009(4)SC662; 2009(5)SCALE12; (2009)11SCC721; 2009(4)LC1851(SC); 2009AIRSCW4752
of offences punishable under Section 409 read with Section 120B and Section 420 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). The High Court dismissed the revision petition on the ground that there are sufficient
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dipendra G. Choksi and anr. Vs. Dipak Chimanlal Patel and anr.
Gujarat
Jan-07-1997
Company
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138
[1999]95CompCas280(Guj); (1997)2GLR1191
section 138 of the Act, but the same also as well attracts the ingredients of section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Accordingly, merely because for whatever reason the complainant inadvertently failed to add section 420 of the Indian Penal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParkash Singh Badal and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-06-2006
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7 to 11, 12, 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4) and 24; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 71, 72, 120B, 161 to 165A, 405, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 41(1), 154, 154(1), 154(3), 155, 155(2), 155(3), 155(4), 156, 156(1), 156(3), 157, 157(1), 157(2), 158, 161, 170, 173, 173(2) to 173(6), 173(8), 190, 193, 196, 197, 197(1), 197(2), 212(2), 219(1), 215, 220, 260, 262 to 265 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1969; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882 - Sections 154; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Secti
AIR2007SC1274; 2007(3)ALD8(SC); JT2007(1)SC89; 2006(13)SCALE54; (2007)1SCC1; 2007AIRSCW115; (2007)1SCC(Cri)193; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)142; 2007(1)KLJ497; 2007(2)KCCRSN92.; MANU/SC/5415/2006
questioning the validity of proceedings initiated under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the 'Act') and/or the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). In the latter category of cases the question raised is either lack of sanction … sentence in the context of the factual scenario cannot be read out of context.The offence of cheating under Section 420 or for that matter offences relatable to Sections 467, 468, 471 and 120B can by no stretch of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Balakrishna Reddy Vs. Director, Cbi, New Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Mar-14-2008
Criminal
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6(1); Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 7, 9 and 11(1); Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 417, 418, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 482; Business Rule - Rules 12, 13 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 77, 77(2), 166, 166(1), 166(2) and 166(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197
AIR2008SC1754; 2008(56)BLJR1575; JT2008(4)SC162; 2008(4)SCALE617; (2008)4SCC409
appellant for offences punishable under Sections 420, 471, 474, 467, 468 and 417 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short). A charge-sheet was filed in the Court of Special Magistrate, Central Bureau of Investigation ('CBI'
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshfaq Khan and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-01-2008
Criminal
Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420 and 424; Trade Tax Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167
2008AIRSCW897; 2008CriLJ1598; JT2008(2)SC157; 2008(2)SCALE156; (2008)11SCC143
Report (in short the 'FIR') lodged for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 and 424 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti- Social Activities (Prevention) … for quashing the First Information Report (in short the 'FIR') lodged for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 and 424 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Sections 2 and 3
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFakhruddIn Ahmad Vs. State of Uttaranchal and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-05-2008
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 161, 173(2), 190 to 199, 200 to 203 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138
2008(2)ALD(Cri)629; 2008CriLJ4377; JT2008(10)SC240; 2009(I)OLR(SC)216; 2008(12)SCALE339; 2008AIRSCW5881; 2008(5)LH(SC)3500
referred to as the complainant, for allegedly committing offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short `the I.P.C.').3. A few material facts giving rise to the present appeal are:The appellant owns a … the appellant filed a complaint against the complainant and his partner under Section 138 of the Act and Section 420 I.P.C. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the complaint and issued summons against the complainant.5. Aggrieved by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Varghese Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police and anr.
Kerala
Jan-13-1999
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102, 102(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420
1999(2)ALT(Cri)322; [1999]97CompCas436(Ker); 1999CriLJ1111
a small amount, the petitioner cannot escape from the liability for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in case the investigation revealed that the petitioner had collected huge amounts from a large number of creditors
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Shish Ram
Supreme Court of India
Jul-15-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 378(1), 378(2), 378(3) and 378(5); Constitution of India - Article 141
2008(10)SCALE147; (2008)11SCC311; 2008AIRSCW4930
02/95. Respondent faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC').3. Though various points were urged in support of the appeal, the primary stand was … H.P. in Criminal case No. 133/2 of 02/95. Respondent faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC').3. Though various points
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »