Advanced Search Results

Ram Naresh Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 380, 411, 413, 414 and 457; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 155, 156, 156(3), 157, 157(1), 158, 159, 160 to 163, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 172, 173, 173(1), 173(3), 176, 190, 319 and 491

Reported in : (2009)11SCC299

by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate on remand taking cognizance of offences punishable under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC').3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:One Arun Kumar Mishra (hereinafter referred to … to quash the order passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate on remand taking cognizance of offences punishable under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC').3. Background facts in a nutshell

Vaman NaraIn Ghiya Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 380, 411, 413 and 457; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2 and 436 to 450

Reported in : AIR2009SC1362; 2009CriLJ1311; 2009(234)ELT3(SC); 2009(1)KarLJ714; 2008(16)SCALE324; (2009)2SCC281

of appellant before the High Court was that he was discharged of offence punishable under Section 413 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') by the trial Court and therefore he was facing trial only for the offence

J. Muthukrishnan and anr., Etc. Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2), 190, 197, 197(1), 227, 306(4)(1), 306(5), 403(I) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120B, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165A, 166, 167, 168, 169, 182, 193, 197, 198, 201, 204, 211, 218, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 263A, 379, 380, 381, 382, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 465, 466, 467 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2), 6 and 6(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5, 5(1) and 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2570

420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860). (These offences are not applicable to the State of Jammu and Kashmir). 2. Offences punishable … ORDER1. All these applications had been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 13 of 1988 (Popularly known … 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473,

Mahendra Kumar Vs. Director General Prisons and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 - Rules 9 and 14; Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Act - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121 to 140, 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 332, 364, 386, 387, 388, 389, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : RLW2005(4)Raj2255; 2005(3)WLC694

392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.Unless they have undergone (one fourth) of the sentence including remission and the Superintendent of Jail recommends the … 29.03.2005 has been annexed as (Annexure-R1). It is then pleaded that since the petitioner was also convicted under Sections 395/396 IPC; parole to him would be prohibited under Rule 14 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole

Mithu Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121, 121-A, 122, 124-A, 125, 128, 130, 131, 132, 194, 222, 225, 232, 238, 255, 300, 302, 303, 304, 305, 307, 311, 313, 314, 326, 329, 363-A, 364, 371, 376, 388, 389, 394, 395, 396, 400, 409, 412, 413, 436, 438, 449, 459, 460, 467, 472, 474, 475, 477, 489-A, 489-B, 489-D and 511; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2), 354(3), 397, 397(2) and 427(2)

Reported in : AIR1983SC473; 1983CriLJ811; 1983(1)Crimes957(SC); 1983(1)SCALE331; (1983)2SCC277; [1983]2SCR690

a very exceptional class of cases- 'the rarest of rare cases'.5. The Indian Penal Code was passed in 1860. The framers of that Code achieved a measure of success in classifying offences according to their subject-matter, defining … 1. The question which arises for consideration in these proceedings is whether Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code infringes the guarantee contained in Article 21 of the Constitution which provides that 'No person shall be deprived … 363-A, 364, 371, 376, 388, 389, 394, 395, 396, 400, 409, 412, 413, 436, 438, 449, 459, 460, 467, 472, 474, 475, 477, 489-A, 489-B,

Vijay Singhal and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Miscellaneous

of gang rape occurred on 16.12.2012. Consequently, an FIR bearing no.413/2012 was registered, initially, under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC). 11.2. The victim was given treatment in a local hospital in the city. On her

Phulel Singh Vs. State Of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Jora Singh (Accused No.1), father of the appellant herein was acquitted of the charge under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC” for short) and the conviction and sentence qua the appellant herein rendered by 1 the learned court … the Division Bench of the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal Nos. 413-DBA of 2001 and 909-SB of 1999 along with Criminal Revision No.134 of 2000, wherein the Division Bench partly

Ramesh Singh S/O Sunder Singh Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR138; 1993CriLJ2743

today. 9. Order accordingly. Criminal - conviction - Section 124 of Bombay Police Act and Section 413 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - conviction and vires of Section 124 challenged on grounds that appellant-accused being tried and acquitted under Section

Rajesh Gevarchand Luniya Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

respectively. His Bail Bonds, if any shall stand cancelled. III) Both the Revision Applications are disposed of accordingly. Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 413, 411 – Bombay Habitual Offenders Act, 1959 - Section 2(e) – Case Referred: BanneSingh @

Emperor Vs. Bholasing Amersing

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1924Bom303; (1924)26BOMLR211

which are said to have been supplied by Cassidy to the complainant. Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Sections 413, 420, 109--Abetment of cheating--Adulteration of saccharine with bicarbonate of soda--Sale, of the mixtnrt s saccharine through … charged with one Cassidy before Mr. Thacker, the additional Presidency Magistrate, under Section 420, read with Sectiom 114, Indian Penal Code, with having cheated the complainant on August 9, 1923, in respect of 139 tins of saccharine valued at