Advanced Search Results

Pramod Kumar Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Prisons Act, 1894; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 2005; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 436A and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409 and 420; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 20, 21, 32 and 142

Reported in : IV(2008)BC505(SC); 2008CriLJ4697; [2009(1)JCR79(SC)]; 2008(12)SCALE623; (2008)9SCC685; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(9)SCC685; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528

different States for commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and also under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.5. According to the petitioner, there is

Abdul Rehman and ors. Vs. K.M.Anees Ul Haq.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 211, 500, 109, 114 rw 34, 406 rw 34, 211, 500, 193 to 196, 199, 200, 205 to 211, 419, 465, 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 195, 482, 195(1)(b), ; Dowry Prohibition Act. - Sections 3, 4;

Reported in : 2011(4)KLT142(SN); 2011(10)SCC696; 2012(1)CTC184; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)93; AIR2012SCW536; 2012CriLJ1060

appellants, alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 211, 500, 109, and 114 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 was barred by the provisions of Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The High Court … Moti Bagh, New Delhi, accusing the Respondent-K.M. Anees-Ul-Haq and four others of commission of an offence punishable under Section 406 read with Section 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complainant's case

Ashok Kumar Grover Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : [1998]91CompCas485(P& H)

366, dated May 2, 1994, registered at Police Station, City Fatehabad, for the offences under Section 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and further proceedings in consequence thereof.2. The facts which can be gathered from the record and necessary for

Raja Ram Kashyap and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320 and 320(2)

Reported in : JT2009(8)SC119; 2009(6)SCALE412

the parties have settled their dispute and want to compound the offence i.e., Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'Act'), the court should have permit it to be in terms of Sub-section (2) of

M. Narasimhulu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406, 420 and 468; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(3)ALT16; [2001]105CompCas930(AP); (2001)3CompLJ206(AP)

to return the car in spite of repeated demands. A complaint under sections 406, 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, was filed.3. The contention of the appellants is that having regard to the fact that at best they … resigned from the directorship but refused to return the car in spite of repeated demands. A complaint under sections 406, 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, was filed.3. The contention of the appellants is

Madhu Sudan Malhotra Vs. Kishore Chand Bhandari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 378(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 406

Reported in : 1988(36)BLJR360; 1988Supp(1)SCC424

on merits and decided as to whether the respondents were guilty of offences punishable under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 by the wrongul retention of the

Nirmala J. JhalA. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406, 467, 471

had been involved in a CBI case for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 467 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. After investigation, a chargesheet had been filed against him in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mirzapur … of Oriental Insurance Company at Mehasana had been involved in a CBI case for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 467 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. After investigation, a chargesheet had been filed against him

White Metals P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Kanika Metals P. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482, 156(3); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138, 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Sections 406, 420, 120B

of the Criminal Complaint Case No. 145/1 of 2003 filed by the respondent/complainant under Section 406 and 420 Indian Penal Code, 1860, 1960 against them and further seeking quashing of order dated 17.02.2007, whereby, summons were issued by the learned

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rajiv Dubey

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 294, 405, 406, 420 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 200 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2008(16)SCALE62; 2009(1)SCC706; 2009(1)LHSC64; 2009(1)SCC(Cri)603

SDJM, Bhubaneshwar in ICC 210 of 2000 taking cognizance of offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). In the complaint it was inter-alia alleged as follows:The complainant as the Managing Director … 18.04.2001, the Learned Court of SDJM, Bhubaneshwar in ICC 210 of 2000 issued process against the appellants under Section 406/420 IPC.13. According to the appellants the ingredients of Section 405 are not present. In any event, the plea

Citibank N.a Vs. State Nct of Delhi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Sections 406, 409, 420, 120-B, 34

1 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide FIR No. 227/2009, a case under Section 406/409 Indian Penal Code, 1860.2 Further submits that the matter has been settled between the parties vide compromise deed dated 11.11.2011.3 The compromise