Advanced Search Results
Bai Chaturi and ors. Vs. States
Gujarat
Jun-27-1960
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 400 and 401; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 54
AIR1960Guj5
- character as evidence - Section 54 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 400 and 401 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - general bad character of accused is irrelevant in criminal proceedings - Section 54 allows evidence of fact
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSharaf Shah Khan and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-16-1961
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162, 237, 410 and 428; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395, 400 and 411; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 14, 54 and 114
AIR1963AP314; 1963CriLJ121
(i) Criminal - approver's evidence -Section 162 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Sections 395 and 400 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 -accused is entitled to a copy of approver's statement under Section 162 - accused was not given copy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamdas and ors. Vs. State
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-26-1965
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395 and 400
AIR1966AP344; 1966CriLJ1234
is accordingly dismissed.24. Amicus Curiae fee, Rs. 500 (Rupeesfive hundred only). Criminal - evidence - Section 400 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellants prosecuted under Section 400 for belonging to gang of dacoits - in earlier case appellants had
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajendra Kumar Sitaram Pande and Etc. Vs. Uttam and Another
Supreme Court of India
Feb-11-1999
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 201, 202, 205, 397 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 400, 499 and 500; Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR1999SC1028; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)589; 1999(3)ALLMR(SC)232; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)162; 1999CriLJ1620; 1999(1)Crimes88(SC); JT1999(1)SC426; 1999(1)MPLJ544; 1999(I)OLR(SC)394; 1999(1)SC
quash the criminal proceeding itself. This appeal is allowed. Criminal - defamation - Sections 499 and 500 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - whether allegation in complaint read with report of Magistrate make out offence under Section 500 or not … complaint, the Sessions Judge came to the conclusion that the case is one covered by exception 8 to Section 400 IPC and, therefore, issuance of process itself is an abuse of process. He, accordingly set aside the order
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Gundla Narayana and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-29-1959
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395 and 400; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 27 and 133; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337
AIR1959AP387; 1959CriLJ947
be disposed of as per directions of the Sessions Judge. (i) Criminal - dacoity - Section 400 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - chief point to be established in offence of gang dacoity is association in crime - accused can
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBansi Vs. State
Allahabad
Mar-15-1956
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 400
AIR1956All668; 1956CriLJ1272
passed on him for these offences. His appealis therefore dismissed. Criminal - culpable homicide - Section 300 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - piglet entered house of appellant - owner tried to remove piglet pleaded to spare piglet and herself … - death due to laceration of lever and rupture of spleen - held, exception 1 and 4 to Section 400 not applicable - liable for culpable homicide amounting to murder. - - On cutting open the walls of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHanuman Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Rajasthan
Nov-27-1996
Criminal
Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 9, 10 and 16; ;Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 14; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 3, 4, 4(22), 5, 9, 9(3), 11, 16, 16(2), 26, 122(2), 122(4), 122(5), 194, 200, 200(1), 202, 313, 381, 397, 400 and 465; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 4, 41 and 42
1997CriLJ1054
26 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read as under :Section 4 : Trial of offences under the Indian Penal Code and other laws :-(1) All offences under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) shall be investigated, inquired … heard by an Additional Sessions Judge if such appeal has been transferred to him by the Sessions Judge. Section 400 confers similar power on the Additional Sessions Judge to hear revision applications under Chapter XXX of the Code
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Kumar Vs. Director General Prisons and ors.
Rajasthan
May-27-2005
Criminal
Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 - Rules 9 and 14; Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Act - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121 to 140, 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 332, 364, 386, 387, 388, 389, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460; Constitution of India - Article 226
RLW2005(4)Raj2255; 2005(3)WLC694
392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.Unless they have undergone (one fourth) of the sentence including remission and the Superintendent of Jail recommends the … 29.03.2005 has been annexed as (Annexure-R1). It is then pleaded that since the petitioner was also convicted under Sections 395/396 IPC; parole to him would be prohibited under Rule 14 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTanveer Ahmed @ Tanveer Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-26-2014
Land Acquisition
file a charge sheet for offences punishable under Sections 399, 400, 332, 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’, for brevity) and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandranaika Alias Marvadi and ors. Vs. State by Arasikere Rural Polic ...
Karnataka
Sep-07-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392, 395, 399 and 400; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
2007(6)KarLJ572; ILR2007(4)Kar3989; 2007(6)AIRKarR73(DB)
Hassan in S.C. No. 211 of 2002, convicting the appellants-accused for an offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and in … and registered a case in Crime No. 140 of 2002 for the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 400 of the IPC. On 28-7-2002 at about 3.00 a.m. accused 6 was also apprehended and on the basis
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »