Advanced Search Results
Md. Rafique @ Chachu Vs. State of West Bengal
Supreme Court of India
Nov-21-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307 and 398
2008(6)LHSC4219
which by the impugned judgment upheld the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') while setting aside the conviction under Section 398 IPC as done by learned Additional
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Shankar Singh Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-22-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 395, 396 of 398,; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 156 (3), 173, 203, 204
2012(1)KLT7(SN); 2012(1)SCC130; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)513; 2012(2)SCJ291; 2012(2)MLJ(Crl)383; (2012)1SCC130
controversy involved herein. [Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai, JJ.] Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 395, 396 of 398, - Punishment for dacoity�--�An FIR No. 147/2004 dated 6.12.2004 was lodged by the appellant naming Ramakant Singh and … the cognizance taken by the Magistrate vide order dated 2.8.2008 against the respondent no.2 under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called `IPC') has been quashed.2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that: A. A
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAli Mehndi Vs. State, Government of Nct Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Aug-27-2002
Criminal
Criminal Law; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 398; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 9
JT2002(8)SC108
ORDER1. The appellant was tried for offences punishable under Sections 393/357 of the Indian Penal Code. 1860 (in short 'IPC'), Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and section 5 of the Terrorists and Disruptive … 25 of the Arms Act. He was also awarded seven years' rigorous imprisonment having committed the offence under Section 398 IPC and a fine of Rs. 1000/- was also imposed. Both the sentences were to run concurrently. 5.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
incable Net (Andhra) Limited and ors. Vs. Apaksh Broadband Ltd. and or ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-18-2008
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10(1), 10E, 10E(4C), 10E(4D), 10E(5), 10E(6), 10F, 46, 235 to 250, 254, 291, 293, 397, 398, 402 and 403; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Company Law Board Regulations, 1991
[2008]142CompCas892(AP)
before them shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Section 10E(5) of the Act adumbrates an important principle of judicial adjudicative resolution. It is to the … 69 of 2006, before the Company Law Board (CLB), Additional Principal Bench, Chennai. It was under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956, (the 'Act', for brevity) alleging mismanagement and oppression by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Babu Shelar Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
May-05-1999
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 75, 394 and 398; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235 and 294
2000(5)BomCR516
appeal of the applicant against the conviction and sentence under the Section 394 r/w Sections 398 &75 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The accused was arrested on the spot while attempting a robbery on a knife point- It was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Shaiyyam Vs. Collector and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-18-2001
CivilElection
Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 21, 21(1), 21A, 36, 36(1) 39, 39(1), 40(1), 40(2) and 130; Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke Sarpanch Tatha Up-Sarpanch, Janapad Panchayat Tatha Zila Panchayat Ke President Tatha Vice-President Ke Virudh Avishwas Prastav) Niyam, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petition, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 303, 304B, 305, 306, 312 to 318, 366A, 366B, 373 to 377, 395 to 398, 408, 409 and 458 to 460
2001(5)MPHT466; 2001(3)MPLJ375
Chapter XVI, Sections 395 to 398, 408, 409, 458 to 460 of Chapter XVII and Chapter XVIII of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860) or under any Law for the time being in force for the prevention of adulteration … Sarpanch is removed from his/her post by vote of no-confidence, is he/she entitled to contest in the bye-election.5. Section 17 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') deals with the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Kumar Vs. Director General Prisons and ors.
Rajasthan
May-27-2005
Criminal
Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 - Rules 9 and 14; Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Act - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121 to 140, 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 332, 364, 386, 387, 388, 389, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460; Constitution of India - Article 226
RLW2005(4)Raj2255; 2005(3)WLC694
392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.Unless they have undergone (one fourth) of the sentence including remission and the Superintendent of Jail recommends the … 29.03.2005 has been annexed as (Annexure-R1). It is then pleaded that since the petitioner was also convicted under Sections 395/396 IPC; parole to him would be prohibited under Rule 14 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnugraha Jewellers Ltd. and anr. Vs. K.R.S. Mani and ors.
Chennai
Dec-17-1999
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 477A
[2002]111CompCas501(Mad)
1996, which was registered in Crl. No. 28 of 1996 in City Crime Branch, under Section 477 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The complaint against K.R. Loganathan and his two sons is regarding misappropriation of Rs. 3 crores. It appears … position occupied by him. It further held that prejudice to the company's interest to be shown only under Section 398. While referring to the demand by minority shareholders for additional shares and the refusal of such request, the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. and anr. Vs. R.S. Gupta, H.J.S., Special Judge (D.A.A.)
Allahabad
Aug-03-2002
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956 - Rules 3 and 19; Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 190(1), 195, 195(1) 340 and 350; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166, 167, 175, 176, 216A, 302, 303, 304, 307, 308, 325, 326, 327, 329, 331, 333, 363, 364, 365, 368, 369, 386, 387, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402 and 511; Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1983 - Sections 2, 3, 5 and 19
(2003)1UPLBEC312
Section 340 Cr.P.C. are two fold. Firstly; that any offence punishable under any of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely, Sections 193 to 196 (both inclusive) Sections 199, 200, 205 to 211 (both inclusive) … 326, 327, 329, 331, 333, 363, 364, 365, 368, 369, 386, 387, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code.14.2. Under Section 190 of the Code of Criminal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMoreshwar Savey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-12-2001
Criminal
Criminal Law Amendment Act - Sections 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 11, 11(1), 145, 161, 169, 173(8), 190, 193, 226, 227, 228, 233, 234, 234(1), 397, 460 and 482; General Clauses Act 1897 - Sections 10 and 21; Delhi Special Police Establisment Act, 1946; Evidence Act - Sections 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114, 120A, 120-B, 141, 147, 149, 153-A-B, 201, 295, 295-A, 297, 323, 332, 336, 337, 338, 342, 379, 391, 390, 392, 394, 395, 397, 406, 408, 409, 427 and 505; Ayodhya Act, 1993; Limitation Act 1908; Companies Act - Sections 630; Constitution of India - Article 216, 233 and 227
2001CriLJ1765
in the Schedule below :SCHEDULE1. Case relating to Crime No. 198/92 under Sections 153A, 153B and 505 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, P.S. Ram Janam Bhumi, Ayodhya, district Faizabad, State v. Sri Ashok Senghal and others.10. Before the Court of … (Moreshwar Savey v. State of U.P. and another) the revisionist is to be charged with offences punishable Under Sections 147, 153A, 153B, 295, 295A, 505 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to … 1992 under Section 392, IPC.(12) Crime No. 225 of 1992 under Sections 398, 336, IPC.(13) Crime No. 226 of 1992 under Sections 395, 114, IPC.(14)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »