Advanced Search Results

State of U.P. Vs. Ilyas

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 394 and 397

Reported in : AIR2009SC1145; (2009)1SCC365

Judge, Saharanpur, found the respondent as well as one Multan guilty for offence punishable under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentenced each of them to 7 years' rigorous imprisonment.2. Two appeals were filed

K. Gopala and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka by Women Police Station, Shi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 498A, 304-B, 34; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 397, 401; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4

there were allegations of commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A and 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the IPC, for brevity) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, … (Prayer: This Criminal Revision petition is filed under Section 397 read with 401 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, by the advocate for the petitioners praying that this Honble Court

Suga Ram @ Chhuga Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149 and 302; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378(1), 378(2), 378(3), 378(5), 397 and 401; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141

Reported in : AIR2006SC3258; 2006CriLJ4643; JT2006(12)SC441; 2006(II)OLR(SC)782; 2006(9)SCALE365; (2006)8SCC641

faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 148 and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( in short the IPC) and Section 3(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities … Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur dismissing the revision application filed by the appellant under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the Cr.P.C.) questioning legality and

Niranjan Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 320, 392, 395 and 397

Reported in : AIR2007SC2434; 2007CriLJ3523; JT2007(9)SC33; 2007(8)SCALE546; (2007)10SCC459; 2007AIRSCW4318; (2007)3Crimes97(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)2021.

the appeal filed by the appellants, challenging their conviction for offences punishable under Sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') in terms of the order passed by the learned Third Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar. … persons running away. 4. In appeal though several points were urged, the primary stand was that ingredients under Section 397 IPC were not made out as no grievous hurt was found. The prosecution took the stand that for

Anwarul Haq Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 324, 334, 504, 506 and 506(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401

Reported in : AIR2005SC2382; 2005(2)ALD(Cri)57; 2005CriLJ2602; JT2005(5)SC9; 2005(2)KLT840(SC); (2005)10SCC581; 2005(2)LC1001(SC)

Judge of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench affirming his conviction for offence punishable under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentence of one year rigorous imprisonment as imposed by the trial court. The … and sentence of one year rigorous imprisonment as imposed by the trial court. The revision application filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code') was dismissed. Initially

Dilawar Singh Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 8(2), 23,23B and 23(3); Sea Customs Act - Sections 19; Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304, 392, 395, 397, 398 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 147, 154, 154(3), 155, 155(3), 156, 156(3), 169, 173, 190, 190(1), 200, 202, 202(1), 204, 210, 304, 342, 448 and 465

Reported in : AIR2007SC3234; 2007(2)BLJR2828; 2007CriLJ4709; JT2007(10)SC585; 2007(10)SCALE556; 2007(2)LC1108(SC); 2007AIRSCW5899; (2007)3Crimes388(SC)

filed by the appellant and affirming his conviction for offences punishable under Sections 452, 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentencing him to undergo one year, two years and seven years rigorous imprisonment … and therefore the mandate of Section 304 Cr.P.C. has been clearly violated. In any event, the ingredients of Section 397 IPC have not been established. 5. Learned Counsel for the respondent on the other hand submitted that mere

inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu Vs. Balaprasanna

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 392 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164

Reported in : 2008AIRSCW5600; 2008CriLJ4332; JT2008(8)SC242; 2008(10)SCALE466; (2008)11SCC645; 2008(3)Crimes284; 2008(5)LH(SC)3636; 2008 (11) SCC 64

respondent (hereinafter referred to as the `accused'). The accused was convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. … stipulation by Principal District Judge, Madurai. He was also convicted for offences punishable under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC and sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine.3. Background facts in

S. Arumugam Vs. the Commissioner of Police Madras and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 75, 148, 302, 332, 336, 341, 379, 380, 392, 394, 397, 457 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1995CriLJ194

detention - Sections 34, 75, 148, 302, 332, 341, 379, 380, 392, 394, 397, 457 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - detention of petitioner challenged - petitioner detained with a view to prevent him from acting in any … under Chapter XVI or Chapter XVII or Chapter XXII of the Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860).' Section 2(a)(iii) reads as follows : '2. Definitions. - In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, - (a)

Bandi Udham Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 432(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 224, 304-B, 376, 377, 395, 396, 397 and 498-A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 432(1)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3259; 2001(2)MPHT252; 2001(2)MPLJ15

granted to the offenders convicted under Sections 120B, 224, 304B. Dowry Death, 376, 377, 395 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 besides various other categories which had been enumerated in the aforesaid paragraph with which we are not concerned … was a case where the deterrent punishment was warranted and since the offence under Section 395 read with Section 397, IPC, stood included in the offence envisaged under Section 396, IPC, without passing an order awarding a sentence

Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 302, 363, 366, 376, 392 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2), 313, 354(3), 366, 367, 368, 369 and 370; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21 and 141

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1573; (2009)3GLR2319(SC); JT2009(6)SC161; 2009(6)SCALE469; 2009(4)LC1885(SC); 2009AIRSCW3391; 2009(5)SCC740

appellant. The accused was found guilty for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376, 397 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). He was sentenced to 7 years, 10 years, imprisonment for life, 7 years and … only raped but was murdered by the accused appellant. The accused was found guilty for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376, 397 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). He was