Advanced Search Results

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. C. Tobit and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 149, 302, 325 and 326; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 366, 367, 369, 371, 371(1), 371(2), 371(4), 372, 417, 419, 421, 422, 425, 428 and 442; Evidence Act - Sections 65, 74, 76 and 91

Reported in : AIR1958SC414; 1958(6)BLJR479; 1958CriLJ809

dismissed. 14. Appeal dismissed. Criminal - copy of Order - Sections 147, 149, 302, 325 and 326 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 366, 367, 369, 371, 371 (1), 371 (2), 371 (4), 372, 417, 419, 421, 422, 425, 428 … Das, C.J. 1. The respondents before us were put up for trial for offences under Sections 147, 302, 325 and 326, Indian Penal Code read with s. 149 of the same Code. On July

Nxxx & Ors. vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners seeks quashing of the FIR No.371/2016 dated 16.07.2016 registered at PS.: Seelampur, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/377/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (D.P. Act) as also all proceedings emanating therefrom,

Ram Prakash Chaddha Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

the owner of Goodwill Enterprises dealing with wood, registered Case Crime No.351 of 1993 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘the IPC’) at Police Station Modi Nagar, District Ghaziabad, alleging that his cashier/accountant-Ram Kishore and one

Rupesh Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Police Station Seelampur, vide which the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Sections 306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 while co-accused Brij Devi was acquitted of the charges levelled against her. Appellant Rupesh Kumar was sentenced as … and order on sentence dated 25th May, 2000 in Session Case No.13/96 arising out of FIR No.126/92 under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC registered at Police Station Seelampur, vide which the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Sections … the MLC, the doctor declared the patient unfit for statement. Crl. Appeal. 371/2000 Magistrate was informed. SI Om Prakash returned back to the spot, inspected

Mithu Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121, 121-A, 122, 124-A, 125, 128, 130, 131, 132, 194, 222, 225, 232, 238, 255, 300, 302, 303, 304, 305, 307, 311, 313, 314, 326, 329, 363-A, 364, 371, 376, 388, 389, 394, 395, 396, 400, 409, 412, 413, 436, 438, 449, 459, 460, 467, 472, 474, 475, 477, 489-A, 489-B, 489-D and 511; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2), 354(3), 397, 397(2) and 427(2)

Reported in : AIR1983SC473; 1983CriLJ811; 1983(1)Crimes957(SC); 1983(1)SCALE331; (1983)2SCC277; [1983]2SCR690

a very exceptional class of cases- 'the rarest of rare cases'.5. The Indian Penal Code was passed in 1860. The framers of that Code achieved a measure of success in classifying offences according to their subject-matter, defining … 1. The question which arises for consideration in these proceedings is whether Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code infringes the guarantee contained in Article 21 of the Constitution which provides that 'No person shall be deprived … 304 part I, 305, 307, 311, 313, 314, 326, 328, 363-A, 364, 371, 376, 388, 389, 394, 395, 396, 400, 409, 412, 413, 436, 438,

Amar Singh, Andstate of Rajasthan.Vs. Jagdish and Anr, and State of Ra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code,(IPC) 1860, Sections 498-A And 304-B; Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32

the High Court should have sustained the conviction of Jagdish and Gordhani and we accordingly dismiss this appeal. Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 498-A & 304-B: Dowry Death - Deceased was married to appellant on 5.5.1992 - Found dead on … which resulted in her death" within the meaning of Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act. (Para 11)--Indian Penal Code, 1860. Section 498-A: What is punishable under Section 498A or Section 304B IPC is the act of cruelty or harassment … In Smt. Shanti and Another v. State of Haryana [(1991) 1 SCC 371] cited by Mr. Sharma, this Court has held that where there is

Sushil Kar and ors. Vs. Syed Mehdi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 401 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 76, 79, 324, 379 and 440; ;Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 371, 372 and 383

Reported in : (1993)1CALLT331(HC)

of the complaint filed by the opposite party No. 1-complainant, 'Theft' has been defined in Section 378 of the Indian Penal Code as follows:-'Whoever intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that … is submitted on behalf of the petitioners-accused that the aforesaid articles had been removed in terms of Sections 371 and 372 of the aforesaid Act. The owner/s thereof was/were entitle to take back the same in terms

M.Karthick vs State Rep by

Court : Chennai

Sanjay Singh Sengar Vs. State of M.P. reported in (2002) 5 SCC 371 it has been held as follows:- “A. Penal Code, 1860 - S.107 … Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuriby judgment dated 27.01.2016, convicted the Appellant for the offence under Section 306 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years together with fine of Rs.2,000/- … S.482 Cr.P.C, the quashing of complaint case, on facts held, was just - Therefore, was not interfered with. B.Penal Code, 1860 - Ss.306 and 107 - Abatement of suicide - Held, words uttered in a fit of anger or

Gulshan @ Mahender Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the impugned judgment dated 29th September, 2009 have been convicted under Sections 498A/34, 304B/34 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). By order of sentence dated 30th September, 2009, they have been sentenced to life imprisonment under Section … Imprisonment of 06 months each. Relying upon, Smt. Shanti and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana (1991) 1 SCC 371.no separate order of sentence has been passed for conviction under Sections 498A/34 IPC.2. Before we advert to the

Dr.Johny Kulangara vs the Secretary to Government

Court : Kerala

outs, buntings etc.(H) To substantiate his contentions, petitioner has referred to theconstitutional provisions, Sections 268 & 278 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, provisions of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, Kerala Police Act, 2011, and Section 364 … step, booth, or other structures or fixtures, in or upon any public street.I) He has also contended that Section 371 of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994, authorises the Secretary of the Municipality to remove the structures and fixtures