Advanced Search Results
Dhananjoy Bhowmik Vs. State of Tripura
Guwahati
Jun-25-1998
Criminal
Tripura Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1998; Tripura Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Third Amendment) Act, 1992; Tripura Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1997; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167, 167(2), 439 and 439A; Central Act; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 26, 27 and 28; Explosives Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122, 123, 124A, 128, 130, 132, 153A, 232, 238, 255, 302, 303, 304, 304B, 307, 313, 326, 333, 364, 365, 366, 366A, 366B, 367, 368, 376, 386, 387, 392, 394, 395, 396, 397, 399, 409, 412, 436, 449, 450, 467 and 489A; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 84 and 173
303, 304,307,326,333,364,365,366,366A, 366B, 367, 368, 376, 386,387, 392, 394, 395, 396,397, 399, 412, 436, 449 and 450 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (No. 45 of 1860) and Sections 25,26, 27 and 28 of the Arms Act, 1959 (54 of 1959) … H.K. Sema, J.1. This bail application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing the accused Amulya Bhowmik who has been arrested on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Shaiyyam Vs. Collector and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-18-2001
CivilElection
Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 21, 21(1), 21A, 36, 36(1) 39, 39(1), 40(1), 40(2) and 130; Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke Sarpanch Tatha Up-Sarpanch, Janapad Panchayat Tatha Zila Panchayat Ke President Tatha Vice-President Ke Virudh Avishwas Prastav) Niyam, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petition, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 303, 304B, 305, 306, 312 to 318, 366A, 366B, 373 to 377, 395 to 398, 408, 409 and 458 to 460
2001(5)MPHT466; 2001(3)MPLJ375
Chapter XVI, Sections 395 to 398, 408, 409, 458 to 460 of Chapter XVII and Chapter XVIII of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860) or under any Law for the time being in force for the prevention of adulteration … X, XII, Sections 302, 303, 304B, 305, 306, 312 to 318, 366A, 366B, 373 to 377 of Chapter XVI, Sections 395 to 398, 408, 409, … Sarpanch is removed from his/her post by vote of no-confidence, is he/she entitled to contest in the bye-election.5. Section 17 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') deals with the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Banubai Ardeshir Irani
Mumbai
Nov-17-1942
Criminal
AIR1943Bom150; (1943)45BOMLR281
Clause 26-High Court-Interference-Verdict of jury-Grounds of interference.;In order that the presumption under explanation (1) to Section 373 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, should take effect, it is necessary that the accused person should be a prostitute or should be keeping … in his charge to the jury when referring to Explanation I to Section 373 dealt with importation under Section 366B and obtaining possession under Section 373 together.(b) By dealing in the said manner with the said two questions,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramjilal and anr. Vs. the State
Rajasthan
Oct-13-1950
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 362, 366 and 366B; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 133
AIR1951Raj33
Judge, Jaipur City, convicting and sentencing them under Sections 366 and 366B, Penal Code, to 8 years' rigorous imprisonment under each count. The sentences were … the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, convicting and sentencing them under Sections 366 and 366B, Penal Code, to 8 years' rigorous imprisonment under each count. The sentences were made to run concurrently.2. According to the … Judge amended the charge under Section 366 by substituting 'abduction' for 'kidnapping' and added a fresh charge under Section 366B, Penal Code. The prosecution produced 9 witnesses, out of whom the principal witnesses are the two girls, P.Ws.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbani Mohan Das and Others Vs. the State of Tripura
Guwahati
Nov-15-2011
Criminal
366B, 367, 368, 376, 386, 387, 392, 394, 395, 396, 397, 399, 412, 436, 449 and 450 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (No.45 of 1860) and Sections 25, 26, 27, 28 of the Arms Act, 1959 (54 of 1959) and … 1. The petitioner, set the law in motion presenting an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., praying for bail of accused-persons, namely, (1) Sri Ranju Das, (2) Sri Ranjit Das, (3)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajan and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jan-17-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 266, 366, 366A, 376 and 376(1)
2002CriLJ3152; 2002(4)WLN132
taken into consideration only when primary evidence found in birth or school certificate is not available. ; (b) Penal Code, 1860 - Section 376--Rape--Consent of prosecutrix--Effect--Prosecutrix found below 16 years of age on date of occurrence--Held, as prosecutrix is … that certified copies from school registers while deciding the question of age of girl, amount to evidence under the Indian Evidence Act.9. The above view was reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Harpal Singh and Anr. v. … cannot be sustained because of the simple reason that Sections 366-A and 366B IPC have been introduced to punish the export and import of girls
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›