Advanced Search Results
Arjun Singh Vs. State of H.P.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-06-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 100, 107, 109, 120A, 120B, 363, 365, 366, 375, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D and 511
AIR2009SC1568; 2009CriLJ1332; JT2009(2)SC413; 2009(2)SCALE302; (2009)4SCC18; 2009(2)ShimLC83; 2009(2)LC651(SC); 2009AIRSCW1096; 2009(3)KCCRSN161
the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 376, 511, 363 and 366 as well as Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years, 3 years, 4 years,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShashidhar Purandhar Hegde and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka
Supreme Court of India
Oct-15-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 363, 368, 506 and 507; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162 and 162(1)
AIR2004SC5075; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)1035; 2004CriLJ4677; JT2004(9)SC177; 2005(1)KarLJ29; 2004(8)SCALE843; (2004)12SCC492
for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 363, 368, 506 and 507 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The trial Court directed acquittal of the present appellants being of the view that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Gajanan @ Hemant Janardhan Wankhede
Supreme Court of India
Jul-09-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
2008CriLJ3549; 2008(9)SCALE802; (2008)8SCC38
Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati. The respondent was convicted for offence punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and was sentenced to undergo RI for 5 years, 4 years and 3 years … as recorded by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati. The respondent was convicted for offence punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and was sentenced to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sannaia Subba Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-24-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366A, 368, 372 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 222 and 378
2008(56)BLJR2583; RLW2008(3)SC2689; 2008(10)SCALE401; 2008AIRSCW6014; 2008(3)Crimes174; 2008(4)LH(SC)2955
the High Court - Legality of - Appellate Powers - Discussion - Sections 363, 366A, 372, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the Act) - Family of the prosecutrix, a minor, filed a missing report casting doubts on the Appellants … charge sheet was submitted by the Police against all the three accused persons who are appellants herein under Section 363, 366A, 368 and Section 372 read with 511 of the IPC.6. During the course of the trial, 13
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod Vs. State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
Apr-27-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 302, 363, 366, 376, 392 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2), 313, 354(3), 366, 367, 368, 369 and 370; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21 and 141
2009(57)BLJR1573; (2009)3GLR2319(SC); JT2009(6)SC161; 2009(6)SCALE469; 2009(4)LC1885(SC); 2009AIRSCW3391; 2009(5)SCC740
appellant. The accused was found guilty for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376, 397 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). He was sentenced to 7 years, 10 years, imprisonment for life, 7 years and … only raped but was murdered by the accused appellant. The accused was found guilty for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376, 397 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). He was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Satish
Supreme Court of India
Feb-08-2005
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 363, 366 and 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366
AIR2005SC1000; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)614; 2005CriLJ1428; 2005(2)CTC71; JT2005(2)SC153; (2005)3SCC114; 2005(1)LC367(SC); [2005] 1 SCR 1132
fasten guilt on the accused. She, therefore, convicted him under Sections 363, 366, 376(2), 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The crime was held to be one falling under rarest of rare category. Death … of accused's underwear as also the undergarment the deceased was wearing. This recovery was treated to be under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence. Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act').6. The trial Court found that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRohidas and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
Aug-07-2014
Criminal
appellants-original accused Nos.1 and 2 against their conviction under sections 363 and 366 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC in short). Each of them has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMalleshi Vs. State of Karnataka
Supreme Court of India
Sep-15-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 362, 363, 364A and 365
2004(2)ALD(Cri)833; 2004CriLJ4645; JT2004(8)SC72; 2004(7)SCALE671; (2004)8SCC95
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), and sentenced to life imprisonment by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Chitradurga (hereinafter … under Section 362 of the IPC. Accordingly conviction of the accused was altered to offences relatable to Sections 363 and 365 of the IPC.15. In the instant case as the factual position found by the trial court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParkash Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Dec-02-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 361, 363, 366, 376 and 511
AIR2004SC227; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)40; 2004CriLJ595; JT2003(10)SC58; 2003(10)SCALE389; (2004)1SCC339
offences of kidnapping and attempted rape punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'). The victim was called and taken away by the accused-appellant who was known to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Ismail Sayadsaheb Mujawar
Mumbai
Mar-24-1933
Criminal
AIR1933Bom417; (1933)35BOMLR886
the construction of the statute. The Indian Penal Code was enacted in 1860. The Indian Majority Act was enacted in 1875. When the Indian Penal … 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The accused was charged with offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and the jury brought in a verdict of not guilty of any offence. The learned Judge had told … the jury that it would be open to them to bring in a verdict of simple kidnapping under Section 363, but that in order to justify such a verdict they must be satisfied that the age of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »