Advanced Search Results

Moideenkutty Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 122(7), 125, 125(3), 128, 250(3), 345(1), 358(2), 358(3), 359, 446 and 488; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53 and 67; General Clauses Act - Sections 3 and 3(27); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3402; 2008(2)KLJ741

or context,'27. 'Imprisonment' shall mean imprisonment of either description as defined in the Indian Penal Code; (45 of 1860).12. The definition of the expression imprisonment as such is not available in the Indian Penal Code; but dealing … such liability to undergo imprisonment cannot be held to be a punishment as contemplated under Section 53 of the Indian Penal Code.8. The decision of the Supreme Court in Kuldip Kaur v. Surinder Singh : 1989CriLJ794 makes the position crystal … undergo rigorous imprisonment for default Counsel points out Sections 250(3), 345(1), 122(7), 358(2), 358(3), 359 and 446 where it has been made clear that only

Banwarilalji Agarwal & Ors. Vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

PS Rajouri Garden. JUDGMENT1311.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in. FIR No.600/2016, under Section 379/420/468/471/120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Rajouri Garden. Subsequently, Section 467 IPC has been added.2. During the pendency of the present application, … Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 358/2017 $~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BANWARILALJI AGARWAL & ORS STATE

Babu and anr. Vs. State Rep.by Insp.of Police, Chennai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

spot. Pursuant to the FIR, a case was registered under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘the IPC’). After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed against Elumalai (A-1), Prakash (A-2), Babu (A-3), Senthil … towards the East and Ravi died on the spot. Pursuant to the FIR, a case was registered under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘the IPC’). After investigation, … rep. by Inspector of Police, Chennai ….. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos. 358-359 OF 200.Elumalai and Anr. …… Appellants Versus State rep. by Inspector of

Azim Shah and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1135

AIR 1976 SC 1562 : 1976 Cri LJ 1192. After construing the provision placed in Section 57 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, and the various provisions placed in the Jail … sentence, the matter has to be placed before the State Government for proper orders, as envisaged by Rules 358 and/or 698, as the case may be. Accordingly, the petitioners have no right to maintain the petition for

Manjit Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

1973 for quashing of the FIR No.358 dated 16.08.2010 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short).registered at Police Station Civil Lines District Amritsar and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom in … 3 in person along with Mr.Sarabjeet Singh Khaira, Advocate. **** SABINA, J. Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of the FIR No.358 dated 16.08.2010 under Sections

Baldeo Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 60, 62, 68, 69, 70 and 73; Constitution of India - Article 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 140, 143, 145, 147, 151, 153, 160, 172, 174, 178, 179, 269, 277, 279, 283, 285, 286, 289, 290, 294, 323, 334, 336, 341, 352, 356, 357, 358, 374, 379, 380, 381, 403, 411, 426, 428, 430, 447, 448, 461, 504, 506 and 510; Criminial Procedure Code, 1898 - Sections 109 and 110

Reported in : AIR1957SC612; 1957CriLJ998; [1957]1SCR995

commit any such offence, if committed within the local limits of its jurisdiction, namely : (a) offences under the Indian Penal Code, sections 140, 143, 145, 147, 151, 153, 160, 172, 174, 178, 179, 269, 277, 279, 283, 285, 286, … 285, 286, 289, 290, 294, 323, 334, 336, 341, 352, 356, 357, 358, 374, 379, 380, 381, 403, 411, 426, 428, 430, 447, 448, 461, … first those provisions of the Act which, according to learned counsel for the appellants, are discriminatory in character. Section 62 of the Act, which provides for the criminal jurisdiction of Gram Cutcherries, is in these terms :

Mary Angel and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145, 146, 147, 148(3), 227, 340, 341, 342, 357, 358, 359, 362, 369, and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 315, 406, 420 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 426, 497(5) and 561(A); Bombay Civil Fund Act, 1882; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 - Rule 10(a)

Reported in : AIR1999SC2245; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)1; 1999CriLJ3513; 1999(3)Crimes64(SC); JT1999(3)SC638; 1999(3)SCALE663; (1999)5SCC209; [1999]3SCR594; 1999(2)LC1021(SC)

each of the appellants while rejecting a frivolous or vexatious petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for setting aside the charge framed against the appellants?3. FIR was lodged by Josephine Jaya on 29th September, … a frivolous or vexatious petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for setting aside the charge framed against the appellants?3. FIR was lodged … while awarding compensation court has to take into consideration, inter alia, the expenses properly incurred in the prosecution; Section 358 provides for payment of compensation where any person causes a police officer to arrest another person, without sufficient

In Re: Govindaswami

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 21 and 409; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 190; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1); Madras District Municipalities Act, 1920 - Sections 358

Reported in : AIR1954Mad401; (1954)IMLJ455

collector is a public servant within the meaning of Section 21, I. P. C. as is clear from Section 358 of the District Municipalities Act. The Additional First Class Magistrate should undoubtedly have framed a charge under Section

S.P. Agarwal Vs. Delhi Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Electricity Supply Undertaking (DMC) Service Regulations, 1981; Delhi Municipal Corporation - Sections 98

Reported in : 64(1996)DLT198; (1997)ILLJ285Del; 1996RLR483

DELHI) -Respondent Crl. Misc. (Main). 1207 of 1996 &: Crl. Misc. (Main). 358 of 1995-Decided in Sept., 1996 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498-A, 304-B, 406 - Cruelty, Dowry- death, Punishment, for Criminal Breach of Trust - Accused alleged … is not binding on the Disciplinary Authority. In fact, Desu (DMC) Service Regulations, 1981, which were enacted under Section 98 of the Dmc Act, 1957, deal with the disciplinary proceedings and are completely silent about seeking the

Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur Vs. Shivakant Shukla

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 3(1), 8, 16, 16A, 16A(9) and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 22, 31, 31(1), 32, 133, 134, 136, 141, 226, 265, 352, 352(1) and (3), 358, 359, 359(1) and (1A) and 368; Evidence Act - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 76, 79 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 56, 57, 167, 419 and 419(1); Constitution of India (Thirty-eighth Amendment) Act; Presidential Order; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 3 and 80 - Order XXXV, Rule 12;Constitution of India (Thirty-ninth Amendment) Act

Reported in : AIR1976SC1207; 1976CriLJ945; (1976)2SCC521; [1976]SuppSCR172; 1976(8)LC610(SC)

of law. The same was the position under the penal laws of India. It was an offence under the Indian Penal Code, as already mentioned, to deprive a person of ins life or liberty unless such a course was sanctioned … 21 and 22. It is also clear that in view of Article 358, while a proclamation of emergency was in operation, nothing in Article 19 … respect to an order of detention which might have been made or which might be made thereafter under Section 3(1) (c) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act as amended for the enforcement of rights conferred by