Advanced Search Results
Sakshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-26-2004
CivilConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15(3), 17, 18, 19, 20(1), 21 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 375, 376, 376(2), 376A to 376D, 377, 506 and 511; ;Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35 and 35(2); Customs Act - Sections 104; ;Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(1); Offences against Person Act, 1861 - Sections 18, 20, 42 and 47; ;Aliens Control Act, 1991 - Sections 25(5); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(1), 167(2), 273, 327(1), 327(2) and 715.1
AIR2004SC3566; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)504; 2004(2)BLJR1378; 98(2004)CLT491(SC); 2004CriLJ2881; 112(2004)DLT457(SC); 2004(77)DRJ390; RLW2004(3)SC402; 2004(6)SCALE15; (2004)5SCC518; 2004 INSC383
set out in prayer (A) aforesaid as offences under Section 375, 376 and 376A to 376D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860;C) Issue such other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem appropriate in the present facts … the trauma of penile/vaginal penetration as traditionally understood under Section 375/376, have been treated as offences tailing under Section 354 of the IPC as outraging the modesty of a women or under Section 377 IPC as unnatural offenses.3.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDalbir Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
May-04-1979
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2), 354(3), 366(1), 368 and 374(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Constitution of India - Article 141
AIR1962SC1106a; 1979CriLJ1058; (1979)3SCC745; [1979]3SCR1059; AIR 1979 SC 1384
may also venture to say, the obsession to get the death penalty abolished from the Statute Book, i.e., Indian Penal Code, 1860, is so great that an interdict against it is surprisingly spelt out from the Constitution itself because right … any warrant for judicial extinguishment of two precious Indian lives. Section 302 of the Penal Code, read with Section 354(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, demands special reasons for awarding the graver sentence, and to borrow the reasoning
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaju Pandurang Mahale Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-11-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 292, 302, 323, 340, 342, 354, 376 and 376(2); Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR2004SC1677; 2004CriLJ1441; JT2004(2)SC425; 2004(2)SCALE408; (2004)4SCC371; 2004(2)LC876(SC)
question legality of the conviction recorded in terms of Sections 342 and 354 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC') by the Trial Court, and affirmed in appeal by the impugned judgment by learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vidyadharan Vs. State of Kerala
Supreme Court of India
Nov-14-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 441 and 448; Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1) and 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4(2), 5 and 193
2003(2)ALD(Cri)1019; 2004(1)BLJR497; 2004CriLJ605; JT2003(9)SC89; 2004(1)KLT105(SC); 2004(2)MhLj596; 2004MPLJ251(SC); 2004(I)OLR11; 2003(9)SCALE581; (2004)1SCC215
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Appellant faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 354 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC') and Section 3(1)(XI) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChief of the Army Staff and Others Vs. Laxman Giri, Ex Havaldar No. 92 ...
Allahabad
Jan-10-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 108, 116 and 120 - Rule 130; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354
2000(1)AWC716; [2000(85)FLR76]; (2000)1UPLBEC868
culminate but had begun on a complaint of Raghav Singh, a Sepoy, making allegations under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The complaint was, to the effect, that the petitioner, Laxman Girl, a non-commissioned officer, had assaulted or used
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShaik Nagoor Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Its Public Prosecutor, High Cou ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-20-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306, 354 and 448
AIR2008SC1500; 2008CriLJ2079; JT2008(3)SC101; 2008(2)SCALE670; 2008AIRSCW1590; 2008(4)LH(SC)2313
Court. By the impugned judgment conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 354 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') was upheld, but the conviction for offence punishable under Section 306 IPC was set
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmrik Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Jan-18-1988
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Section 302; Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C), 1973 - Section 354
1988Supp(1)SCC685
confirming the death sentence passed on the appellant on his conviction on two counts under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for having committed the double murder of the deceased Tarlok Chand and of his neighbour Bahal Singh by … them on the chest with a knife, the “special reason” recorded by the High Court as enjoined by Section 354 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is that they were brutal murders executed in cold blood and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkripal S/O Shyamlal Charmakar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Mar-19-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 122, 354, 375, 376, 399 and 511
2007CriLJ2302; JT2007(4)SC393; 2007(I)OLR(SC)803; 2007(4)SCALE438; 2007AIRSCW2198; (2007)3Crimes115(SC)
the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Satna. Appellant was found guilty of offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years.3. Prosecution version as unfolded during … the doctors PW-7 and PW-8 to contend that at the most the offence can be in terms of Section 354 IPC or Section 511 IPC.Per contra, learned Counsel for the respondent-State submitted that the Trial Court and the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremiya @ Prem Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Sep-22-2008
Criminal
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 228A, 354, 375, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
2008(56)BLJR3060; [2008(4)JCR91(SC)]; RLW2009(1)SC738; 2008(12)SCALE739; 2008(10)SCC81; 2008(4)Crimes126; 2008(6)Supreme596; 2008(5)LH(SC)3473.
dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant and upholding his conviction for offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentence of 7 years imprisonment as was imposed by learned Additional Sessions Judge … the offence it is an obnoxious act of the highest order.12. In order to constitute the offence under Section 354 IPC mere knowledge that the modesty of a woman is likely to be outraged is sufficient without any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Karnataka Vs. Puttaraja
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 228A, 354, 376, 376(1), 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D
AIR2004SC433; 2004(3)ALT6(SC); 2004CriLJ579; JT2003(9)SC603; 2003(10)SCALE325; (2004)1SCC475; 2004(1)LC222(SC)
the offence of rape and at the most the offence for which accused could be convicted is under Section 354 Indian Penal Code, 1860, dealing with the assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage … the advance stage of pregnancy.2. We do not propose to mention name of the victim. Section 228-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') makes disclosure of identity of victim of certain offences punishable. Printing or publishing name
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »