Advanced Search Results

Arjun Singh Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 100, 107, 109, 120A, 120B, 363, 365, 366, 375, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D and 511

Reported in : AIR2009SC1568; 2009CriLJ1332; JT2009(2)SC413; 2009(2)SCALE302; (2009)4SCC18; 2009(2)ShimLC83; 2009(2)LC651(SC); 2009AIRSCW1096; 2009(3)KCCRSN161

the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 376, 511, 363 and 366 as well as Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years, 3 years, 4 years, … a school is admissible evidence to prove the date of birth of the person concerned in terms of Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'Evidence Act'). It may be true that in the entry

Babulal Bhagwan Khandare and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 35, 38, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 to 106, 300, 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105

Reported in : 2004(10)SCALE188; (2005)10SCC404

Nagpur Bench upholding their conviction for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). For the former offence each was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to … responsible ordinarily for what he does and Section 38 IPC ensures that. But Section 34 as well as Section 35 provide that if the criminal act is the result of the common intention, then every person who did

Badshah vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

commission of the CRL.A.NO.369/2015 Page 1 of 39 offences punishable under Sections 120B r/w 396 & 460/396/412 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. Vide the impugned order on sentence dated 10.09.2014, … attached to the evidence of the identification in Court which is not preceded by a Test CRL.A.NO.369/2015 Page 35 of 39 Identification Parade, is a matter for the Courts of fact to examine.51. As observed here in

Subhash Krishnan. Vs. State of GoA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Section 120B, 302, 342, 364, 504, 34, 173, 362, 340; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 313, 161

for any interference. The appeals fail and the same are dismissed accordingly. [A.K. PATNAIK; SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, JJ.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Section 120B, 302, 342, 364, 504, 34 -- PW-9 was the postmortem doctor who noted … by him and issued the certificate about the nature of the injuries found on him.6. The prosecution examined 35 witnesses. The FSL report relating to the blood stains found on the various articles seized revealed the blood

State Vs. Bhimshankar Siddannapppa Thobde and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 38, 35, 307 322 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 233, 237, 239 and 537

Reported in : AIR1968Bom254; (1967)69BOMLR788; 1968CriLJ898

upon. The accused were inter alia convicted of an offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. On appeal, it was found that the common intention of the accused was to cause grievous hurt to … causes is grievous hurt, is said voluntarily to cause grievous hurt. A reference may then be made to section 35 of the Indian Penal Code which says:'Whenever an act, which is criminal only by reason of its being

Ganesh Damodar Datar, Manager, United Commercial Bank Vs. State of Mah ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 102B, 109 and 477; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35

Reported in : 1982(2)BomCR612

Section 5 (1) and 5 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Sections 102B, 109 and 477 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 35 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - petitioner challenged sanction granted to commence proceedings against him

Annakodi Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363 and 375; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT(Cri)364; 1995CriLJ3387

to the revision petitioner. 14. Petition allowed. Criminal - benefit of doubt - Sections 363 and 375 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 35 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - revision against conviction for offences punishable under Sections 363

State of U.P. (Now State of Uttarakhand). Vs. Jai Bhagwan, and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 (Cr.P.C) - Sections 378, 207, 313 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 409 ; U.P. Reorganization Act, 2000 - Section 35;

acquitted the respondents Jai Bhagwan and Chatur Narain, of the charge of offence punishable under Section 409 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as I.P.C.).2) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the lower court record.3) Prosecution story, … High Court seeking leave to appeal in the year 1998. The appeal was received by this Court under Section 35 of the U.P. Reorganization Act, 2000, (Central Act No. 29 of 2000), for its disposal. The leave was

Shah Nawaz Vs. State of U.P.and anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304, 307, 34; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 - Section 52, 20, 15; U.P. Children Act, 1951 - Section 2(4); Evidence Act - Section 35; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 - Rule 12

Case No. 215 of 2007 at Police Station Charthawal, District Muzaffarnagar, U.P. under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC ). (c) On 12.06.2007, the mother of the appellant submitted an application before the … recorded in a register maintained by the school in terms of the requirements of law as contained in Section 35 of the Evidence Act. No statement has further been made by the said Headmaster that either of the

Jasti Bhujangeswara Rao S/O Late Venkata Subbarao Vs. Sub-registrar,

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 19 to 22, 23 to 26, 32, 32A, 34, 34(3), 35, 35(3), 52, 58, 59, 60, 61, 61(2), 69, 71, 72, 73, 73(1), 75, 75(1), 75(4), 76 and 77; Andhra Pradesh Registration Rules - Rules 18 to 20, 26, 58 and 161 to 164; Stamp Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 384, 420 and 506

Reported in : AIR2009AP78; 2009(3)ALT804

First Information Report on 23.01.2008 with P.S. Amarthalur under Sections 420, 384, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. On 29.01.2008, she gave a representation stating that gift deeds were obtained by coercion and without her consent. … that her thumb impressions were obtained on papers without consent and knowledge. First respondent, therefore, refused registration under Section 35(3)(a) of the Registration Act, 1908 (the Act, for brevity), treating the 'admission of execution under threat' as denial