Advanced Search Results

Raju Pandurang Mahale Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 292, 302, 323, 340, 342, 354, 376 and 376(2); Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2004SC1677; 2004CriLJ1441; JT2004(2)SC425; 2004(2)SCALE408; (2004)4SCC371; 2004(2)LC876(SC)

question legality of the conviction recorded in terms of Sections 342 and 354 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC') by the Trial Court, and affirmed in appeal by the impugned judgment by learned

Subhash Krishnan. Vs. State of GoA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Section 120B, 302, 342, 364, 504, 34, 173, 362, 340; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 313, 161

for any interference. The appeals fail and the same are dismissed accordingly. [A.K. PATNAIK; SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, JJ.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Section 120B, 302, 342, 364, 504, 34 -- PW-9 was the postmortem doctor who noted

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Santosh Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 375, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342, 376(1) and 376(2)

Reported in : AIR2006SC2648; 2006CriLJ3636; JT2006(6)SC320; 2006(7)SCALE101; (2006)6SCC1

the respondent. He faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 376(2)(f) and Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The trial court found respondent guilty of the offences for the offence punishable under

State of Rajasthan Vs. Hemraj and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice Act, 2000; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 342, 375, 376 and 376(2)

Reported in : AIR2009SC2644; 2009(57)BLJR1882; JT2009(6)SC87; 2009(6)SCALE586; (2009)12SCC403; 2009(5)LC2299(SC); 2009AIRSCW4068

as follows:Respondents were facing the trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 342 and 376(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). PW1 was the victim. The trial court noticed that it was the accused Chandan

Phool Kumari Vs. Office of the Superintendent

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 342, 307, 34, 53; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC), 1973 - Section 482; Delhi Prisons Act, 2000 - Section 36, 35; Delhi Prisons (Transfer of Prisoners, Labour and Jail Industry, Food, Clothings and Sanitation) Rules, 1988 - Rule 43, 45, 2(k)

Court in case FIR No. 487 of 1995 under Sections 323, 342, 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 10 years and, thereafter, the High Court, in

Bhupinder Sharma Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code 1860 - Sections 34, 228A, 342, 375, 376, 376(1), 376(2), 376(2)(1), 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D; ;Evidence Act - Sections 114A; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983

Reported in : AIR2003SC4684; 2004CriLJ1; (2004)1GLR761; JT2003(Suppl2)SC493; 2003(8)SCALE735; (2003)8SCC551; 2004(1)LC495(SC)

as done by the Himachal Pradesh High Court for an offence of rape punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code 1860, (in short 'the IPC') is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal.2. We do not propose to … sentence only. Appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 376 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 342 read with Section 34 thereof. The enhancement of sentence was done in respect of offence punishable under Section

Sham Shankar Kankaria Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 143, 147, 149, 302, 304, 325 and 342; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 37(1) and 135; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60

Reported in : JT2006(8)SC533; 2006(II)OLR(SC)708; 2006(8)SCALE760

against the acquittal of the accused persons of the charge under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and of Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 (in short the 'Bombay … Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC. All the six accused persons were convicted for offence punishable under Section 342 read with Section 34 IPC. For the first offence accused No. 1 Sham Shankar Kankaria was sentenced to

Jagvir Singh and ors. Vs. State (Delhi Admn.)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 342, 330 and 365

Reported in : AIR2007SC2244; 105(2008)CLT209(SC); JT2007(8)SC488; 2007(8)SCALE260; (2007)5SCC359

in Sessions Case No.25/1984 for offence punishable under Sections 342, 365 and 330 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Learned Single Judge observed that conviction was not questioned and what was submitted related

State by Sub-inspector of Police Vs. Cauverappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 342, 366 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 428

Reported in : ILR2008KAR74; 2007(5)KarLJ104; 2007(4)AIRKarR651

been acquitted of the offence punishable under Sections 366, 342 and 506 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. The essential facts of the case leading up to this appeal with reference to the rank of the

Lalliram and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342, 376, 392 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR123(SC)]; JT2008(10)SC67; 2008(12)SCALE491; (2008)10SCC69; 2008AIRSCW6046; 2008(10)SCC69; 2008(4)Crimes99; 2008(6)Supreme472; 2008(5)LH(SC)3704

one Chaturbhuj faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 376, 392, 342 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). The trial Court directed acquittal of all the three accused persons. In appeal filed … accused persons namely the present appellants and one Chaturbhuj faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 376, 392, 342 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). The trial Court