Advanced Search Results

Ajay Bind vs.state Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Nihal Vihar under Sections 323/302/34/174A of the IPC is modified to one under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Order on sentence 63. As noted above, by a common order on sentence dated 29th March, 2016, on … Crl. A. No.392/2016) and Shankar Bind and Raju @ Brahm Dev Bind Crl.A.Nos.392/2016 & 925/2016 Page 1 of 33 (appellants in Crl. A. No.925/2016) assail the common judgment dated 22nd March, 2016 and consequential order on sentence

Fancy Rehabilitation Trust, a Trust Registered Under Provisions of Bom ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act; Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities and Equal Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 25, 26, 32, 33 and 41; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Cantonment Act, 1924; Registration Act; Stamp Act; Bombay Cooperative Societies Act, 1925; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Societies Registration Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 42 and 141

Reported in : (2007)ILLJ1073Bom

Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, was a public servant within the meaning of Clause (12) of Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the purposes of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Whilst considering the issue, the … to identify posts in the establishments which can be reserved for persons with disability and thereafter review the lists.Section 33 is relevant and reads as under:33. Reservation of posts. -Every appropriate Government shall appoint in every establishment such

Chhajulal Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1972SC1809; 1972CriLJ1184; (1972)3SCC411; [1972]1SCR906

Period of imprisonment in default in payment of fine - Criminal breach of trust - Section 406 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellant convicted by Munsif Magistrate for offence under Section 406 and sentenced to two years of rigorous … awarded in default of payment of fine. It is this question only which has been argued before us.2. Section 33 of the Criminal Procedure Code runs as follows:33(1) The Court of any Magistrate may award such terms of

Vijayalekshmi Amma Vs. Bindu

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 12(5), 16, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 18 to 23, 23(2), 25, 26, 28, 28(1), 31, 31(1), 32, 32(1), 32(2), 33, 34, 35 and 36; ;Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 155(2), 156(1) and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 498A; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 21 and 226

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT79

the accused.(3) While framing charges under Sub-section (1), the Magistrate may also frame charges under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or any other provision of that Code or the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of … the Indian Penal Code or Dowry Prohibition Act, if the facts disclose the commission of such an offence. Section 33 provides that if any Protection Officer fails or refuses to discharges his duties as directed by the Magistrate

The Management of Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi Vs. Bhopal Singh Pa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceLabour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Section 302; Reserve Bank of India (Staff) Regulations, 1948 - Regulation 46(1)(3)(4), 25; Industrial Disputes Act - Section 33-C(2)

Reported in : AIR1994SC552; I(1994)BC379(SC); [1994(68)FLR22]; JT1993(6)SC266; 1994LabIC80; (1994)ILLJ642SC; 1993(4)SCALE360; (1994)1SCC541; [1993]Supp3SCR586; 1994(1)SLJ147(SC); 1994(1)

however, be no order as to costs. - [ P.B. Sawant,; S. Mohan and; S.P. Bharucha, JJ.] - Indian Penal Code, (IPC) 1860 - Section 302; Reserve Bank of India (Staff) Regulations, 1948 - Regulation 46(1)(3)(4), 25; Industrial Disputes … the said period4. Thereafter, the employee filed the present application before the Central Government Labour Court under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') claiming difference in the amount paid to

State of H.P. Vs. Satya Dev Sharma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 120-B, 218, 379, 467, 468, 471, 419; Forest Act 1927 - Section 33; Prevention Of Corruption Act 1947 - Section 5(2)

Reported in : (2002)10SCC601

disposed of and all the contempt matters are closed. - [ K.T. Thomas and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.] - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section. 120-B, Sections. 218, 379, 467, 468, 471 and 419 - Forest Act, 1927 - Section. 33

Pappu Alias Susanta Das and ors. Etc. Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 33, 34, 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : 1998(2)ALT(Cri)22; 86(1998)CLT485; 1999CriLJ738

offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34, and under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, IPC). Each one of them is sentenced to undergo R.I. for life for the first offence … application.The contention is fallacious and cannot be accepted. Section 34 is to be read along with the preceding Section 33 which makes it clear that the 'act' spoken of in. Section 34 includes a series of acts as

Tarlok Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 148, 149, 201, 302, 307 and 364; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33 and 288; Evidence Act, - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1974SC1797; 1974CriLJ1265; (1973)2SCC458

set aside. Criminal - defects in evidence - Sections 34, 148, 149, 201, 302, 307 and 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 33 and 288 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 33 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 -

BashiruddIn Ashraf Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33; Bihar Waqfs Act, 1947 - Sections 58 and 65; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1957SC645; 1958(6)BLJR1; 1957CriLJ1023; [1957]1SCR1032

appeal is accordingly dismissed. 11. Appeal dismissed. Trusts and Societies - removal - Sections 40 and 67 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 33 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 58 and 65 of Bihar Waqfs Act, 1947 and Article 19(1)(g) of

Shanti Lal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 27, 27(2), 56, 57, 57(1), 58, 58(1), 59, 60, 65 and 65(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 63 to 70 and 304; Towns Nuisances Act (Madras), 1889 - Sections 3 and 3(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923; Bihar Wakfs Act, 1947 - Sections 58; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 29, 30, 30(1) and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2814; 2008CriLJ386; JT2007(12)SC1; 2008(1)KLT503(SC); 2008(1)MPHT1(SC)

18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 63 to 70 of the of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Accused-Appellant found to be in possession of … think it is, included in the first, then Section 65 applies to it also; but, in any case, Section 33, Criminal Procedure Code, imposes the same limit in unmistakable terms. It seems to me unreasonable to suppose that