Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 328 · Page 1 of about 268 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 22 2013

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ for short) and Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81 and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, … Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1281 of 2012 whereby the High Court dismissed his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) seeking regular bail in C.R. No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2008

State of M.P. Vs. Munnibai and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 328

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4692; JT2008(10)SC376; 2008(12)SCALE543; (2008)10SCC305; 2008AIRSCW6455

trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 302 and Section 328 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). The accused persons were found quilty and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and five

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2011

Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan, and ors. Vs. State of KeralA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326, 328, 201, 299, 300, 304, 307 Read with Section 34 ; Kerala Abkari Act, 1955 - Sections 55(a)(g)(h)(i), 57A, 58, 8 ; Cochin Abkari Act ; Madras Abkari Act ;

section and section 57B the expression `grievous hurt' shall have the same meaning as in section 320 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act 45 of 1860).(2) whoever omits to take reasonable precautions to prevent the mixing of any noxious … Sessions Judge, Kollam by its judgment dated 16.7.2002 for various offences punishable under Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326, 328 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as also under Sections 55 (a)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 05 1994

Y. Srinivasa Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-05-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 328, 341, 342, 365, 366A and 376

Reported in : 1995(1)ALT(Cri)133; 1995CriLJ1597

14. Appeal allowed. Criminal - kidnapping and rape - Sections 328, 341, 342, 365, 366A and 376 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - four charges on accused - Assistant Sessions Judge found accused guilty of offence punishable under Sections 366-A … in Sessions Cases No. 68 of 1990, In all four charges were framed against the accused-appellant. They were Sections 365, 366-A, 342 and 328, I.P.C. But at the time of trial it was for the first time

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1995

Ma-silamani and Etc. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-07-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 328

Reported in : 1996CriLJ189

for consideration and therefore, it is dismissed. 12. Petition allowed. Criminal - habeas corpus - Section 328 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petition sought to set detenue at liberty - alleged offence was detenue's indulgence in activities prejudicial to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1994

Joseph Kurian Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 272, 300, 302, 304 and 328; Kerala Abkari Act - Sections 2 (10), 55 and 57

Reported in : AIR1995SC4a; [1994]Supp4SCR122

run concurrently.16. In this manner these two appeals are disposed of. Criminal - intoxication - Section 272 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - in order to establish offence under Section 272 prosecution has to prove that articles involved was food … Abkari Act stood rightly proved against A-1 and this aspect of this case need not detain us any longer.Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code reads as follows :328. CAUSING HURT BY MEANS OF POISON ETC. WITH INTENT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2004

Kalabai Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-03-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 328

Reported in : 2004(3)MPHT51

of IPC is hereby set aside. Criminal - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Section 328 and 302 of Indian Penal Code,1860(IPC) - Appellant convicted for offence under Sections 302 and 328 of IPC - Hence, present appeal -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1975

Smt. Phino Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-07-1975

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 328

Reported in : AIR1975SC1327; (1975)4SCC119; 1975(7)LC387(SC)

and maintain those under Section 328. Criminal - Causing hurt by poison - Sections 302 and 328 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellant charged for poisoning three child - One of child died due to poisoning - Session judge

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 1951

In Re: Vokkaligara Yengtappa

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-22-1951

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162 and 162(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 328

Reported in : AIR1952Mad535; (1952)1MLJ62

Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 24 and 27 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 300, 302 and 328 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant challenged conviction under Section 302 - accused poured arsenic into cooked curry which caused death of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2008

Rakesh Thakur Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-25-2008

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 84; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 32, Rule 15; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 328, 329 and 330; ;Constitution of India; ;Kalyani University Examination Regulations - Regulation 14

Reported in : AIR2008Cal187,2008(2)CHN930

the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 protects the interest of a person of unsound mind. Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 postulates 'nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, … Similarly, the interest of a lunatic or of a person of unsound mind has been protected under Sections 328, 329 and 330 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. My endeavour to refer to these provisions is to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial