Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Dass Vs. Raghu Nath and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 360, 360(1), 360(10) and 361; General Clauses Act - Sections 8(1); Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2008SC1298; 2008CriLJ1945; JT2008(2)SC348; 2008(3)KLT250; 2008(2)SCALE444; (2008)4SCC588; 2008AIRSCW1349; AIR2008SC1298; 2008(4)SCC588; 2008CriLJ1945; 2008(1)Crimes412; 2008(2)AICLR324; 2008(2)Supreme45; 2008(2)LH(SC)885; 2008(4)KCCR2268

read with Section 149, Section 324 read with Section 149 and Section 323 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal convicted and sentenced five of the accused persons in … injured victim. The accused persons filed an appeal and learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal reduced the sentence under Section 326 read with Section 149 IPC to three years but upheld all other sentences and the fine imposed by

State of Karnataka Vs. Chikkahottappa @ Varade Gowda and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 143, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 326

Reported in : AIR2008SC2692; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)868; 2008CriLJ3495; 2008(5)KarLJ369; 2008(2)LC877(SC); 2008AIRSCW4497

by the respondent who were convicted for offence punishable under Sections 148, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). By the impugned judgment the High Court held that the respondents were to be … the impugned judgment the High Court held that the respondents were to be convicted under Section 148 and Section 326 read with Section 149 IPC.2. Background facts as projected by the prosecution in a nutshell are as follows:Eight

Bankat and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 325 and 326; Bombay Probation of Offenders Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320, 320(1), 320(2) and 320(9); Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR2005SC368; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)800; 2005CriLJ646; JT2004(10)SC471; 2005(2)MhLj707; 2004(9)SCALE679; (2005)1SCC343

Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Osmanabad for offences punishable under Sections 325 and 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').3. For offence relatable to Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC each of A-1

Harbans Kaur and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 323, 325 and 326

Reported in : AIR2005SC2989; 2005(2)ALD(Cri)330; 2005CriLJ2199; JT2005(3)SC233; (2005)9SCC195; 2005(1)LC671(SC)

appellants (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') under Sections 323, 325 and 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentence as imposed by the trial Court which had sentenced each to undergo

Manjula and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

accused No.1 to 3 for the offence punishable under Sections 504 and 326 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 where Accused Nos.1 to 3 were to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under

Manjula Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

accused No.1 to 3 for the offence punishable under Sections 504 and 326 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 where Accused Nos.1 to 3 were to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under

Dumpala Chandra Reddy Vs. Nimakayala Balireddy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 114, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 215, 464, 464(2), 465 and 537; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 225, 232, 535 and 537

Reported in : AIR2008SC3069; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)183; 2008CriLJ3936; JT2008(8)SC117; 2008(10)SCALE178; (2008)8SCC339; 2008AIRSCW5151; AIR2008SC3069; 2008(8)SCC339; (2008)3SCC(Cri)493; 2008CrLJ3936; 2008(3)Crimes71

of one Gangireddigari Kondareddy (hereinafter referred to as the `deceased') convicted them in terms of Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `the IPC') instead of Section 302 IPC as was done by the Trial Court.3. The respondents,

Rizan and anr. Vs. State of Chhatisgarh, Through the Chief Secretary, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 147, 148, 232, 307, 323 and 326; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105

Reported in : AIR2003SC976; 2003(1)ALD(Cri)367; 2003CriLJ1226; JT2003(2)SC191; 2003(1)SCALE357; (2003)2SCC661

for commission of offences punishable under Section 147, 148 307 read with Section 34 and Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. 1860 (in short 'IPC'). It was alleged that accused Khodhibai (since acquitted) and Pandri Bai (P.W.4) are sisters. There … the accusations against accused-Paras. Vinod, Khodibai and (SIC)5. Accused-appellant Rizan was found guilty for the offences punishable under Section 326 IPC for inflicting injuries on Jhanguram (P.W.2) and under Section 323 IPC for the injuries inflicted on Pandri

Rakesh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304 and 326

Reported in : AIR2008SC1229; 2008CriLJ1646; JT2008(2)SC395; 2008(2)SCALE375

Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore, upholding conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentence of imprisonment for life. Four persons faced trial for committing murder of … impugned judgment, conviction of others was altered and each one of them was convicted for offences punishable under Section 326 IPC read with 34 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years each and to

Surjit Singh Vs. Nahara Ram and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : India Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307 and 326; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC4122; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)763; 2004CriLJ3879; JT2004(6)SC251; 2004(6)SCALE471; (2004)6SCC513; 2004(2)LC1415(SC)

minor injuries to him. The accused was charged for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (hereinafter called the 'IPC') and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1353 (in short the 'Arms Act'). The … short the 'Arms Act'). The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barnala found the accused guilty of offence punishable under Section 326 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years