Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 325 · Page 1 of about 1,154 results (0.049 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 25 2004

Bankat and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-25-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 325 and 326; Bombay Probation of Offenders Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320, 320(1), 320(2) and 320(9); Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR2005SC368; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)800; 2005CriLJ646; JT2004(10)SC471; 2005(2)MhLj707; 2004(9)SCALE679; (2005)1SCC343

Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Osmanabad for offences punishable under Sections 325 and 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').3. For offence relatable to Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC each of A-1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2001

Shivendra Bikaram Singh (Ex. Lt.) Vs. Union of India(Uoi), Through the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-02-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77, 77(2), 78, 78(1), 97, 101, 102, 103 and 163; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325, 352, 425, 452, and 497; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 50; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR695

Real Estate, Zorint, Zurinagar at Vasco Sub-Division, South Goa, District Goa and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.'At the conclusion of … connivance of the said Commander Dilip Baijal (01943-R) and thereby committed an offence punishable, under section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.(2) Did between the 3rd day of April, 1999 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2008

Ramesh Dass Vs. Raghu Nath and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-14-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 360, 360(1), 360(10) and 361; General Clauses Act - Sections 8(1); Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2008SC1298; 2008CriLJ1945; JT2008(2)SC348; 2008(3)KLT250; 2008(2)SCALE444; (2008)4SCC588; 2008AIRSCW1349; AIR2008SC1298; 2008(4)SCC588; 2008CriLJ1945; 2008(1)Crimes412; 2008(2)AICLR324; 2008(2)Supreme45; 2008(2)LH(SC)885; 2008(4)KCCR2268

read with Section 149, Section 324 read with Section 149 and Section 323 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal convicted and sentenced five of the accused persons in … Respondents faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 148 and 326 read with Section 149, Section 325 read with Section 149, Section 324 read with Section 149 and Section 323 read with Section 149 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 28 2007

Khursheed and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-28-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 323 and 325; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320, 320(1), 320(2) and 320(8)

Reported in : JT2007(12)SC138; 2007(11)SCALE574; 2007AIRSCW6444; (2007)4Crimes105(SC)

the appellants are ordered to be acquitted. Criminal - Compounding of offences - Section 325 and 324 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - X was assaulted by appellants - Trial Court convicted appellants for offence under Sections 325/34 and 323/34

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2007

State of Haryana Vs. Jagat Paul and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-20-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 323 and 325

Reported in : 2007(8)SCALE625; (2007)10SCC161

while in the other appeal the three appellants were held guilty of offence punishable under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') read with Section 34 IPC by the High Court. Accordingly their conviction for offence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2012

Selvam and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Inspector of Polic ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 307, 302, 326, 325, 34, 300

of Meyyappan, Ganesh Nagar Police Station Crime No. 795/06 under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC') was registered. Chinnadurai died at the hospital on 25.11.2006. Investigation was conducted and a … Section 34 of the IPC, against Selvam (accused no.7) under Section 147, 302 read with Section 34 and Section 325 of the IPC, against Thilak (accused no.8) under Sections 147 and 325 of the IPC and against Marthandam

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2006

Sham Shankar Kankaria Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-01-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 143, 147, 149, 302, 304, 325 and 342; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 37(1) and 135; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60

Reported in : JT2006(8)SC533; 2006(II)OLR(SC)708; 2006(8)SCALE760

against the acquittal of the accused persons of the charge under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and of Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 (in short the 'Bombay … punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC. The other five accused persons were convicted for offence punishable under Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC. All the six accused persons were convicted for offence punishable under Section 342

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2006

Raj Pal and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 299, 300, 304, 304(1), 323 and 325; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)678; 2006(II)OLR(SC)118; 2006(4)SCALE456; (2006)9SCC678

appellants and one Dharam Singh for offence punishable under Section 304 Part I read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). They were also convicted for offence punishable under Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2009

Siri Kishan and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 299, 300, 302, 323, 324, 325 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1546; JT2009(8)SC305; 2009(6)SCALE438; (2009)12SCC757; 2009(4)LC1937(SC)

149, 325 read with Sections 149, 324 read with Section 149 and 323 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). They were convicted in the following manner:Name Convic Sentence Amount Sentenceof tion awarded of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2008

Baij Nath Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-10-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304 and 325

Reported in : JT2008(8)SC154; 2008(10)SCALE1; (2008)11SCC738; 2008AIRSCW7499

this appeal is to the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and the sentence of imprisonment for 7 years as awarded by the trial Court … appeal.4. Learned Counsel for the appellant took the stand that the proper conviction would be in terms of Section 325 IPC and not under Section 304 Part I, IPC.5. Learned Counsel for the respondent-State supported the order passed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial