Advanced Search Results

Valson and anr. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 324, 341 and 447; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 372 to 394, 417, 418, 423 and 423(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417

Reported in : JT2008(9)SC665; 2008(10)SCALE715; 2008AIRSCW5203

of offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). All accused persons except A-8 faced trial before the Sessions Judge, Thrissur. By judgment

Manjunath Ganesh Hegde and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 324, 325, 326, 341, 504 and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 378

the accused thereby committed offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 326, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).4. Usual investigation was carried out by the police authorities. Charge was framed against the accused. The accused

Kalegura Padma Rao and anr. Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by the Public ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307, 324, 327 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : AIR2007SC1299; JT2007(3)SC513; RLW2007(2)SC1152; 2007(3)SCALE209; 2007AIRSCW1447; (2007)2Crimes217(SC); JT2007(3)SC513; 2007LawHerald(SC)844.

read with Section 149, Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The III Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar found all the accused persons guilty of the

Sri Guruswamy Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

convicting the accused for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 326 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 3 (for short ‘IPC’) and also sentenced to pay fine for the aforesaid offences as incorporated in the

Shailesh Jasvantbhai and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114, 307, 324 and 504; ;Bombay Police Act - Sections 135

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1132; (2006)2GLR1428; JT2006(1)SC639; 2006(1)SCALE561; (2006)2SCC359; 2006(1)LC398(SC)

were tried for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 307, 324, 504 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( in short the 'IPC') and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The trial court held the

Naresh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC), 1860 - Section 324

affidavit in this regard is also filed in this Court.5. The conviction and sentence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘the I.P.C.’), as of now, cannot be compounded but the incident in the present case took

Raghuvansh Dewanchand Bhasin. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 70, 71; Constitution of India. - Article 21, 22(1), 32, 226

Harchandrai filed a complaint, being C.C. No. 163/P/2000, against the appellant, a practicing Advocate, under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the IPC ), in relation to some incident alleged to have taken place in the `Radio

Dharam Singh Vs State and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Sections 324, 34

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide FIR No.329/2001 dated 12.07.2001 a case under Section 324/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered against the petitioner on the complaint of respondent No.2 at police station Shakarpur, Delhi.2. He further

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nikku Ram and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107, 304B, 306, 324 and 498A; Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR1996SC67; 1995CriLJ4184; I(1996)DMC131SC; 1995(5)SCALE94; (1995)6SCC219; [1995]Supp3SCR177

Roshani.18. The appeal is allowed accordingly. Criminal - dowry - Sections 107, 304-B, 306, 324 and 498-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 113-A of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - whether respondents had committed offences under Sections 304-B and

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Pappu @ Ajay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 324, 376(1), 452 and 511

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD(Cri)903; JT2008(8)SC647; 2008(11)SCALE1

aspects is unnecessary.3. The respondent faced trial for offences punishable under Sections 376(1) read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `the IPC') and Sections 324 and 452 IPC. For the first offence, he was sentenced to