Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 32 · Page 1 of about 3,394 results (0.109 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 04 2004

Usman Mian and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)916; 2004(3)BLJR2112; JT2004(9)SC235; RLW2005(1)SC1; 2004(8)SCALE456; (2004)10SCC786

the Patna High Court upholding their conviction for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 32 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and the sentence of imprisonment for life as imposed by Learned Sessions Judge, Gaya,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2006

Sham Shankar Kankaria Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-01-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 143, 147, 149, 302, 304, 325 and 342; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 37(1) and 135; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60

Reported in : JT2006(8)SC533; 2006(II)OLR(SC)708; 2006(8)SCALE760

against the acquittal of the accused persons of the charge under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and of Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 (in short the 'Bombay … hand supported the judgment of the High Court.6. At this juncture, it is relevant to take note of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'Evidence Act') which deals with cases in which statement of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2006

K. Ramakrishnappa Vs. State by Bandur Camp Police Station

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-28-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 113A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 374(2), 378 and 386; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107, 304B, 306 and 498A

Reported in : 2007(5)KarLJ83

Singh Sengar v. State of Madhya Pradesh : 2002CriLJ2796 wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has held as follows.-(B) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 306 read with Section 107 - Abetment of suicide - Quarrel taking place between appellant and deceased in … : AIR2004SC1720 , wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court held as follows.-(A) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), Section 32 - Multiple dying declarations - Wife alleged to have poured kerosene oil on her body and on her

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 10 2009

Gajula Surya Prakasarao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-10-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 32, 155 and 157; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 162 and 164; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2009(6)LHSC3911; JT2009(14)SC203; 2010(I)OLR(SC)25; 2009(13)SCALE656; (2010)1SCC88; 2009(10)LC4737(SC)

High Court confirming the conviction of the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). The High Court by the impugned judgment confirmed the judgment passed by the Principal Sessions … in expectation of death, is not dead, it is not a dying declaration and is not admissible under Section 32 of the Evidence Act. In the instant case, the maker of the statement Exhibit P-21, is not only

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2007

Smt. Shakuntala Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304B, 307 and 498A

Reported in : AIR2007SC2709; 2007CriLJ3747; II(2007)DMC202SC; JT2007(9)SC433; 2007(9)SCALE423; (2007)10SCC168; 2007AIRSCW4895; (2007)3Crimes265(SC)

and Haryana High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentence of imprisonment for life as awarded by the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtak … supported the judgment of the trial Court. 7. At this juncture, it is relevant to take note of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'Evidence Act') which deals with cases in which statement of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2008

Vinay D. Nagar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-03-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 32(1) to 32(8) and 145; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 323, 328, 342, 364, 365, 450 and 456; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 162, 162(1), 164 and 313

Reported in : AIR2008SC1558; (2008)2CALLT56(SC); 2008CriLJ1907; JT2008(3)SC200; 2008(3)SCALE315; (2008)5SCC597; 2008AIRSCW1709; 2008CriLJ1907; 2008(3)AICLR471; 2008(4)LH(SC)2602

No. 990/2002, which upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 364, 450, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'I.P.C.').2. The relevant facts of the case as per the prosecution are that Kalu (the deceased) … the crime. As per the learned senior counsel, the statement of Kalu under Section 161 Cr.P.C. read with Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is not admissible and thus the courts below have committed an error

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2012

M.Sarvana at K.D. SaravanA. Vs. the State of KarnatakA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-24-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC), 1860 - Section 302; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC), 1973 - Section 313, 161; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 32 Clause (1)

Judge-III, Bangalore City, dated 26th October and 28th October, 2004, respectively convicting the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, the ‘IPC’) and awarding him sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, … and evidentiary value of a dying declaration. In the case of Bhajju (supra), this Court clearly stated that Section 32 of the Evidence Act, 1872 was an exception to the general rule against admissibility of hearsay evidence. Clause

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2004

Sakshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-26-2004

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15(3), 17, 18, 19, 20(1), 21 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 375, 376, 376(2), 376A to 376D, 377, 506 and 511; ;Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35 and 35(2); Customs Act - Sections 104; ;Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(1); Offences against Person Act, 1861 - Sections 18, 20, 42 and 47; ;Aliens Control Act, 1991 - Sections 25(5); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(1), 167(2), 273, 327(1), 327(2) and 715.1

Reported in : AIR2004SC3566; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)504; 2004(2)BLJR1378; 98(2004)CLT491(SC); 2004CriLJ2881; 112(2004)DLT457(SC); 2004(77)DRJ390; RLW2004(3)SC402; 2004(6)SCALE15; (2004)5SCC518; 2004 INSC383

set out in prayer (A) aforesaid as offences under Section 375, 376 and 376A to 376D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860;C) Issue such other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem appropriate in the present facts … G.P. Mathur, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution has been filed by way of public interest litigation, by Sakshi, which is an organisation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2007

Sunder Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3281; JT2007(6)SC451; 2007(6)SCALE649; (2007)10SCC371; 2007AIRSCW3240

is the subject matter of challenge. The appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), while the co-accused Laxmi Narain was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 … the first FIR when the investigation was taken.9. At this juncture, it is relevant to take note of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'Evidence Act') which deals with cases in which statement of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2008

Pramod Kumar Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-19-2008

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Prisons Act, 1894; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 2005; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 436A and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409 and 420; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 20, 21, 32 and 142

Reported in : IV(2008)BC505(SC); 2008CriLJ4697; [2009(1)JCR79(SC)]; 2008(12)SCALE623; (2008)9SCC685; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(9)SCC685; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528

different States for commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and also under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.5. According to the petitioner, there is … petition has been taken up for final hearing.2. The present petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 32 of the Constitution. The prayer clause reads thus;It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial