Advanced Search Results
Usman Mian and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Oct-04-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
2004(2)ALD(Cri)916; 2004(3)BLJR2112; JT2004(9)SC235; RLW2005(1)SC1; 2004(8)SCALE456; (2004)10SCC786
the Patna High Court upholding their conviction for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 32 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and the sentence of imprisonment for life as imposed by Learned Sessions Judge, Gaya,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSham Shankar Kankaria Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Sep-01-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 143, 147, 149, 302, 304, 325 and 342; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 37(1) and 135; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60
JT2006(8)SC533; 2006(II)OLR(SC)708; 2006(8)SCALE760
against the acquittal of the accused persons of the charge under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and of Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 (in short the 'Bombay … hand supported the judgment of the High Court.6. At this juncture, it is relevant to take note of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'Evidence Act') which deals with cases in which statement of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Ramakrishnappa Vs. State by Bandur Camp Police Station
Karnataka
Jul-28-2006
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 113A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 374(2), 378 and 386; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107, 304B, 306 and 498A
2007(5)KarLJ83
Singh Sengar v. State of Madhya Pradesh : 2002CriLJ2796 wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has held as follows.-(B) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 306 read with Section 107 - Abetment of suicide - Quarrel taking place between appellant and deceased in … : AIR2004SC1720 , wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court held as follows.-(A) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), Section 32 - Multiple dying declarations - Wife alleged to have poured kerosene oil on her body and on her
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gajula Surya Prakasarao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Nov-10-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 32, 155 and 157; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 162 and 164; Constitution of India - Article 136
2009(6)LHSC3911; JT2009(14)SC203; 2010(I)OLR(SC)25; 2009(13)SCALE656; (2010)1SCC88; 2009(10)LC4737(SC)
High Court confirming the conviction of the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). The High Court by the impugned judgment confirmed the judgment passed by the Principal Sessions … in expectation of death, is not dead, it is not a dying declaration and is not admissible under Section 32 of the Evidence Act. In the instant case, the maker of the statement Exhibit P-21, is not only
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shakuntala Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Jul-27-2007
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304B, 307 and 498A
AIR2007SC2709; 2007CriLJ3747; II(2007)DMC202SC; JT2007(9)SC433; 2007(9)SCALE423; (2007)10SCC168; 2007AIRSCW4895; (2007)3Crimes265(SC)
and Haryana High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentence of imprisonment for life as awarded by the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtak … supported the judgment of the trial Court. 7. At this juncture, it is relevant to take note of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'Evidence Act') which deals with cases in which statement of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinay D. Nagar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Mar-03-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 32(1) to 32(8) and 145; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 323, 328, 342, 364, 365, 450 and 456; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 162, 162(1), 164 and 313
AIR2008SC1558; (2008)2CALLT56(SC); 2008CriLJ1907; JT2008(3)SC200; 2008(3)SCALE315; (2008)5SCC597; 2008AIRSCW1709; 2008CriLJ1907; 2008(3)AICLR471; 2008(4)LH(SC)2602
No. 990/2002, which upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 364, 450, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'I.P.C.').2. The relevant facts of the case as per the prosecution are that Kalu (the deceased) … the crime. As per the learned senior counsel, the statement of Kalu under Section 161 Cr.P.C. read with Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is not admissible and thus the courts below have committed an error
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Sarvana at K.D. SaravanA. Vs. the State of KarnatakA.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-24-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code(IPC), 1860 - Section 302; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC), 1973 - Section 313, 161; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 32 Clause (1)
Judge-III, Bangalore City, dated 26th October and 28th October, 2004, respectively convicting the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, the ‘IPC’) and awarding him sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, … and evidentiary value of a dying declaration. In the case of Bhajju (supra), this Court clearly stated that Section 32 of the Evidence Act, 1872 was an exception to the general rule against admissibility of hearsay evidence. Clause
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSakshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-26-2004
CivilConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15(3), 17, 18, 19, 20(1), 21 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 375, 376, 376(2), 376A to 376D, 377, 506 and 511; ;Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35 and 35(2); Customs Act - Sections 104; ;Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(1); Offences against Person Act, 1861 - Sections 18, 20, 42 and 47; ;Aliens Control Act, 1991 - Sections 25(5); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(1), 167(2), 273, 327(1), 327(2) and 715.1
AIR2004SC3566; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)504; 2004(2)BLJR1378; 98(2004)CLT491(SC); 2004CriLJ2881; 112(2004)DLT457(SC); 2004(77)DRJ390; RLW2004(3)SC402; 2004(6)SCALE15; (2004)5SCC518; 2004 INSC383
set out in prayer (A) aforesaid as offences under Section 375, 376 and 376A to 376D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860;C) Issue such other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem appropriate in the present facts … G.P. Mathur, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution has been filed by way of public interest litigation, by Sakshi, which is an organisation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunder Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
May-07-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60
2007CriLJ3281; JT2007(6)SC451; 2007(6)SCALE649; (2007)10SCC371; 2007AIRSCW3240
is the subject matter of challenge. The appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), while the co-accused Laxmi Narain was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 … the first FIR when the investigation was taken.9. At this juncture, it is relevant to take note of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'Evidence Act') which deals with cases in which statement of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPramod Kumar Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-19-2008
Constitution
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Prisons Act, 1894; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 2005; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 436A and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409 and 420; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 20, 21, 32 and 142
IV(2008)BC505(SC); 2008CriLJ4697; [2009(1)JCR79(SC)]; 2008(12)SCALE623; (2008)9SCC685; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(9)SCC685; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528
different States for commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and also under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.5. According to the petitioner, there is … petition has been taken up for final hearing.2. The present petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 32 of the Constitution. The prayer clause reads thus;It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »