Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 312 · Page 1 of about 169 results (0.060 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 15 1995

Shri Bodhisattwa Gautam Vs. Miss Subhra Chakraborty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-1995

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 312, 376, 420, 493, 496 and 498A; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32 and 38(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114A

Reported in : AIR1996SC922; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)128; 1996(1)ALT(Cri)252; 1996(2)BLJR1533; 1995(4)Crimes722(SC); JT1995(9)SC509; 1995(7)SCALE228; (1996)1SCC490; [1995]Supp6SCR731

in accordance with law. Criminal - sexual assault - Sections 312, 376, 420, 493, 496 and 498-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Articles 21, 32, 38 (1) of Constitution of India and Section 114-A of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1954

In Re: Malayara Seethu

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-09-1954

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 367; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 30; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 312 and 315

Reported in : AIR1955Kant27; AIR1955Mys27; 1955CriLJ372

we acquit her. The bail bonds will be cancelled.8. Accused acquitted. Criminal - miscarriage - Section 312 of Indian Penal Code , 1860 - appellant convicted of offence punishable under Section 312 - conviction challenged - child born alive

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2001

Shankar Shaiyyam Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2001

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 21, 21(1), 21A, 36, 36(1) 39, 39(1), 40(1), 40(2) and 130; Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke Sarpanch Tatha Up-Sarpanch, Janapad Panchayat Tatha Zila Panchayat Ke President Tatha Vice-President Ke Virudh Avishwas Prastav) Niyam, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petition, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 303, 304B, 305, 306, 312 to 318, 366A, 366B, 373 to 377, 395 to 398, 408, 409 and 458 to 460

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT466; 2001(3)MPLJ375

Chapter XVI, Sections 395 to 398, 408, 409, 458 to 460 of Chapter XVII and Chapter XVIII of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860) or under any Law for the time being in force for the prevention of adulteration … V-A, VI, [IX], IX-A, X, XII, Sections 302, 303, 304B, 305, 306, 312 to 318, 366A, 366B, 373 to 377 of Chapter XVI, Sections 395 … Sarpanch is removed from his/her post by vote of no-confidence, is he/she entitled to contest in the bye-election.5. Section 17 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') deals with the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 29 2022

X Vs. The Principal Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department Gov ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-29-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

terminated: “Section 3 - When pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that code or … infants, and of the concealment of births”, with Sections 312 to 318 forming a part of this segment. Section 312 criminalizes abortion, making any person (including the pregnant woman herself) liable for causing the miscarriage of a woman

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1953

Habeeb Mohammad Vs. the State of Hyderabad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-05-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 302, 307, 342 and 436; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162, 172, 197, 216, 256, 257, 312 and 331; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 4, 53, 110, 114 and 145; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1954SC51; [1954]1SCR475; 1954 Cri LJ 338

respondent : G. H. Rajadhyaksha. Criminal - material witness - Sections 148, 302, 307, 342 and 436 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 , Sections 162, 172, 197, 216, 256, 257, 312 and 331 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 3, … upholding the conviction of the appellant by the Special Judge, Warangal, appointed under Regulation X of 1939-F., under sections 243, 248, 368, 282 and 174 of the Hyderabad Penal Code (corresponding to sections 302, 307, 436, 342

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1997

Kalpnath Rai Vs. State (Through Cbi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-06-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, - Sections 3(1), (2) and (3) and 15; Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) -, 1973 - Sections 2, 100(4), 313 and 465; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 52A, 136, 157 and 312; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) -, 1898 - Sections 465(2) and 537; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 4 and 25; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2(1), 3(4), 3(5), 5, 12(2) and 20A(1) and 20A(2); Evidence Act, - Sections 30 and 114

Reported in : 1997(2)ALD(Cri)805; 1998CriLJ369; JT1997(9)SC18; 1997(6)SCALE689; (1997)8SCC732

the Code:words and expressions used herein and not defined but defined in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Code.49. On the strength of the above provision learned … as noticed above, the FIR was recorded not only for offences under TADA but also for offences under the Indian Penal Code for commission of which the police officer concerned was competent to lodge an FIR without such approval. The … enumerated in this section or not to evade apprehension.53. Sections 136 and 312 of IPC are the provisions incorporating two of the offences involving 'harbor' … confessional statements made by A-1 to A-6 in the purported exercise of Section 15 of TADA. Sanction to prosecute A1 was accorded by the Director

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2011

Mohd. Imran Khan Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-10-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Section 376, 366, 34, 363, 342, 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 315, 313; Registration of Birth & Death Act, 1969 - Section 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 118

of 1999, by which the High Court has affirmed the conviction of the appellants under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called `IPC'), however, set aside their conviction under Sections 366/34 IPC and further reduced the sentence from … and order dated 8.12.2009 of the High Court of Delhi passed in Criminal Appeal Nos.311 of 1999 and 312 of 1999, by which the High Court has affirmed the conviction of the appellants under Section 376 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Pramod Kumar & Ors. vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2026

Subject : Education

the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.312/2024 dated 28.03.2024 registered at PS.: Mundka, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 19.06.2024 [Annexure P-4] arrived … Pratap Singh, Advocates R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.312/2024 dated 28.03.2024 registered at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2024

Digambar and Another versus the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-20-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1533

312, 313 and 34 1 “CrPC” hereinafter 2 “FIR” hereinafter 1536 [2024] 12 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 3 filed against the husband of the complainant-Madhav Suryawanshi and the present appellantsDigambar Suryawanshi (Appellant No. 1) and … 25. From a perusal of the provisions, it is clear that the ingredients necessary for the offence under Section 312 of the IPC is that the miscarriage must be voluntarily caused and must not be caused in good

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2026

Sanya Bhasin vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila Court), Delhi summoning the Petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as „IPC‟).2. Briefly stated, Criminal Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. was filed for the offences

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial