Advanced Search Results

Chatar Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 31; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 71, 120B, 201, 302, 364, 364A and 365

Reported in : AIR2007SC319; 2007CriLJ796; 2007(I)OLR(SC)227; RLW2007(3)SC2140; 2006(12)SCALE381

ultimately, he was prosecuted for alleged commission of offences under Section 302, 201, 364, 365 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC', for short). The learned Trial Judge opined that there was no material on record to show that … S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation and application of Section 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 is involved in this appeal, which arises out of a judgment and

Abdul Rahman Jafri Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 10, 11, 13, 13 (1), (2), 15, 19, 19(2) and 31; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161, 165 and 165A; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6; Omission of Certain Sections Act, 1860 - Sections 161 to 165-A

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC528

reads as under :'31. Omission of certain Sections of Act 45 of 1860.--Sections 161 to 165A (both inclusive) of the indian Penal Code shall be … petitioner is that Sections 161 to 165A of the indian Penal Code (both inclusive) have' been omitted vide Section 31 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. 1988 and, therefore, the question of petitioner being prosecuted under the said … Pratap Mishra. Judge Family Court, Allahabad, against the petitioner and four others under Sections 161 and 165A of the indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. was lodged on the basis of a complaint made by Dr. Lal Bahadur to the Hon'ble

Virender Yadav @ Vicky @ Chhotu Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 397, 307, 186, 353, 120B, 34, 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313; Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 - Section 7A(2)

the judgment dated 31.07.2009, by which the appellant was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 397 Indian Penal Code, 1860 in case FIR No.17/2005 registered at police station Ashok Vihar and has further challenged the sentence order of

Shri.vithal Vs. The State Of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Criminal

only that person who has committed the crime can be held guilty. By introducing Section 34 in the Penal Code, the legislature laid down the principal of joint liability in doing the criminal act. The essence of that … Sections 302, 341 and 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC, 1860. Accused Nos.1 to 4 are sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and … BY THE II ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI IN S.C.NO.287/2013 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS341 302 AND506READ WITH34OF IPC IN CRL.A.100003/2017 BETWEEN:1. YALLAPPA S/O DAKHALU YALEBAILKAR, AGE:63. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BELAGAVI.2. BHOOTNATH @ BHUSHAN S/O. YALLAPPA … the deceased Shrikant Nagendra Ambolkar. There was an agreement of sale dated 31.01.2008 entered into between accused Nos. 1 and 2 and the deceased. As

Ganesh Narayan Hegde Vs. S. Bangarappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 499 and 500; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22); Karnataka General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 3(15); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 256(2) and 342

Reported in : ILR1999KAR3480; 2000(4)KarLJ133

upon the same decision in the case of Harbhajan Singh's case, supra, wherein it is stated as follows.-'(a) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 499, Exception 9 and Section 52 -- Good faith -- Proof of -- It is question of fact

Moulasab Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Criminal

accused. Therefore, it falls under Sec. 304 of Part II of IPC, 1860 and not fall under Section 302 of IPC. But the trial Court … at Hubli, in S.C. No.34/2007 dated 30.01.2008 convicting the accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC. By its said judgment and sentence, the accused is sentenced and directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life … this Section provides the punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and draws a distinction between the penalty to be inflicted where an intention of kill being present but in the instant case the accused has … THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100035/2015 BETWEEN: MOULASAB S/O HUSSAINSAB SHIGGAVI, AGED ABOUT48YEARS, R/O KUBIHAL VILLAGE, … life. On the intervening night of 30.10.2006 and 31.10.2006 the accused along with his wife was sleeping

Man Singh, Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 31, 149 and 326

Reported in : 16(1979)DLT70

in the above terms. Criminal - murder - Sections 31, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 and 326 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, 1959 - appellants convicted and sentenced under various provisions of … Sessions Judge, Delhi on 15.6.1976 and were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment as stated below. 1. Under section 302/149 Indian Penal Code Imprisonment for life. 2. Under Section 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code R.I. for

Chandregowda Vs. State by Hoskote Police

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 342; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 31, 45 and 46; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD(Cri)266; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)462; 1999(1)KarLJ65

Acts/Rules/Orders:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 313 and 342;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 31, 45 and 46;Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 300 and 302Cases Referred:State v. Sheikh Khader Sheik Buden, 1991(1) Kar. L.J. 584, ILR 1991 … Acts/Rules/Orders:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 313 and 342;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 31, 45 and 46;Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 300 and

H.G. Ramachandra Rao Vs. Master Srikantha and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 88, 149(2) and 168; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279 and 338; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 31 and 96(2)

Reported in : 1999ACJ1318; AIR1997Kant347; ILR1997KAR2828; 1997(3)KarLJ508

Acts/Rules/Orders:Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 88, 149(2) and 168;Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 17;Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 279 and 338;Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 31 and 96(2) Cases Referred:Paragounda v. Bhimappa,

G.S.R. Krishnamurthi Vs. M. Govindaswamy, Income-tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72(3), 132, 132(4), 136, 139, 142, 143, 148, 269A, 269F, 269-I, 269P(1), 269S, 269AB, 271, 271(1), 271(4A), 273A, 275A, 276, 276A, 276B, 276C, 276C(1), 276D, 276E, 276AA, 276CC, 276DD, 277, 278, 278A, 278C, 279, 279(1) and 279(1A); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - 34, 37, 109, 120B, 193, 196 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 26; Finance Act, 1985

Reported in : (1992)104CTR(Mad)143; [1992]195ITR137(Mad)

intention, committed offence punishable under section 120B read with section 193, 196, 420, 109, 34 and 37 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sections 276C(1), 277 and 278 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in one series of facts connected together … accused No. 1 is 1982-83. He ought to have filed his return of income on or before July 31, 1982. But he actually filed the return on September 30, 1986. 12. Thus, all the accused, acting in