Advanced Search Results
Shaikh Azim @ Vakil @ Kuku Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Jul-14-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304 and 325
2008(10)SCALE174; (2008)11SCC695; 2008AIRSCW5961; 2008(3)Crimes86
the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, upholding conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') as was awarded by the 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur. Three persons faced trial. … from any infirmity.7. In essence the stand of learned counsel for the appellant is that Exception IV to Section 300 IPC would apply to the facts of the case.8. For bringing in operation of Exception 4 to Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBangaru Venkata Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Aug-05-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304 and 307; Criminal Procedre Code - Sections 228(2)
2008CriLJ4353; 2008(11)SCALE16; (2008)9SCC707
the Andhra Pradesh High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentence of imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulation as … the accused taking any undue advantage. 7. The residuary plea relates to the applicability of Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC.8. For bringing in its operation it has to be established that the act was committed without premeditation,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Kishan Rao and ors. Vs. Mrs. P. Santha Reddy and anr. (No. 1)
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-07-2000
CompanyCriminal
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 297, 299, 300 and 629A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409 and 441; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468 and 468(3)
2000(2)ALD(Cri)212; [2001]40CLA126(AP); [2002]111CompCas361(AP); 2001CriLJ2729
for offences punishable under Sections 299(4) and 304 of the Companies Act, 1956 and under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Besides, accused No. 1 also faces a charge for an offence under Section 411 of the Indian Penal … contract either directly or indirectly which makes them ineligible to participate or vote in the board proceedings under Section 300 of the Companies Act, 1956. Thus, it is alleged that the provisions of Sections 299 and 300 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Raj Pal and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Apr-19-2006
Criminal
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 299, 300, 304, 304(1), 323 and 325; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
2006(1)ALD(Cri)678; 2006(II)OLR(SC)118; 2006(4)SCALE456; (2006)9SCC678
appellants and one Dharam Singh for offence punishable under Section 304 Part I read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). They were also convicted for offence punishable under Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC … 'culpable homicide of the first degree'. This is the gravest form of culpable homicide, which is defined in Section 300 as 'murder'. The second may be termed as 'culpable homicide of the second degree'. This is punishable under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandraiahgari Ananthareddi and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-15-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 300 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 30
1996(1)ALT(Cri)489; 1996CriLJ2109
other case. 23. Appeal allowed. Criminal - benefit of doubt - Sections 34, 201, 300 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 3, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 30 of Indian Evidence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Oct-12-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302
AIR2008SC216; JT2007(12)SC24; 2007(12)SCALE179; 2007AIRSCW6605
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:Paridharinath Vaidya (P.W.7), P. S. I. attached … of wood blow was given and, therefore, the Section 302 IPC has no application, and Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC applies.Learned Counsel for the State supported the judgment of the High Court.8. For bringing in operation of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavi Kumar Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Mar-04-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145 and 161; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 157
AIR2005SC1929; 2005CriLJ1742; JT2005(3)SC62; (2005)9SCC315; 2005(1)LC558(SC)
High Court affirming the conviction of the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentence of imprisonment for life and fine imposed with default stipulation.3. The prosecution … took place in the course of quarrel and, therefore, Section 302 is ruled out, and Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC applies. There was inordinate delay in lodging the FIR and sending the special report to the Illaqa
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrimbak Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Mar-04-2008
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 357; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304I, 307 and 324
2008(2)ALD(Cri)85; JT2008(3)SC375; 2008(3)SCALE405
by the appellant. The appellant was convicted for allegedly having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and was sentenced to imprisonment for life by learned Sessions Judge Akola in Sessions … was given. In essence it was submitted that Section 302 IPC has no application and fourth exception of Section 300 IPC applies.8. The pivotal plea relates to the applicability of Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC.9. For bringing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSalim Sahab Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Dec-05-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 324
103(2007)CLT531(SC); [2007(2)JCR213(SC)]; 2006(13)SCALE228; 2007(1)SCC699; (2007)1SCC(Cri)425; (2007)1Crimes251(SC); 2007(1)KCCR556(SC).
Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur holding the appellant guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, the 'IPC'). The appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine … axe to grind, is there. So, the plea regarding interested witnesses is without substance.11. The Fourth Exception of Section 300, IPC covers acts done in a sudden fight. The said exception deals with a case of prosecution not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSridhar Bhuyan Vs. State of Orissa
Supreme Court of India
Aug-09-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304
AIR2004SC4100; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)604; 2004CriLJ3875; JT2004(6)SC299; 2004(6)SCALE504; (2004)11SCC395
Bench of the Orissa High Court confirmed conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'I.P.C.') and sentence of imprisonment for life as awarded by Learned Sessions Judge, Mayurbhanj, Baripada.3. … conviction should not have been done in terms of Section 302 IPC. According to him Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC is applicable.6. In reply, learned counsel for the State submitted that looking at the factual scenario as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »