Advanced Search Results

Kamesh Panjiyar @ Kamlesh Panjiyar Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal Family

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A, 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983

Reported in : AIR2005SC785; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)575; 2005(1)BLJR311; 2005CriLJ1418; I(2005)DMC321SC; JT2005(2)SC218; (2005)2SCC388; 2005(1)LC390(SC)

learned Single Judge of the Patna High Court upholding his conviction for offences punishable under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), while reducing sentence to seven years rigorous imprisonment from ten years imprisonment as was … consideration for the marriage of the said parties.Explanation II- The expression 'valuable security' has the same meaning in Section 30 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).'14. The word 'dowry' in Section 304B IPC has to be

Randhir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 34 and 306; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Muslim Personal Law

Reported in : AIR2004SC5097; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)1024; 2004(8)SCALE689; (2004) 13 SCC 129; 2004 Cri LJ 4985

appellant who faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') was upheld though sentence in respect of appellant No. 2 was reduced. While the … consideration for the marriage of the said parties.Explanation II- The expression 'valuable security' has the same meaning in Section 30 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).'12. Abetment involves a mental process of instigating a person or

Shanti Lal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 27, 27(2), 56, 57, 57(1), 58, 58(1), 59, 60, 65 and 65(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 63 to 70 and 304; Towns Nuisances Act (Madras), 1889 - Sections 3 and 3(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923; Bihar Wakfs Act, 1947 - Sections 58; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 29, 30, 30(1) and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2814; 2008CriLJ386; JT2007(12)SC1; 2008(1)KLT503(SC); 2008(1)MPHT1(SC)

18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 63 to 70 of the of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Accused-Appellant found to be in possession of

M. Yadaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 1996(1)ALD485; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)434; 1996(1)ALT(Cri)242; 1996(1)APLJ213; 1996CriLJ1456; II(1996)DMC209

accused-appellant are set aside. 9. Appeal allowed. Criminal - accidental death - Sections 30, 304B and 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 161 and 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - deceased found dead in well - appellant … expression 'valuable security' has the same meaning as in Section 30 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). Section 304-B of I.P.C. reads thus : 304-B. Dowry death : (1) where the death of a woman is

Sanjiv Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113B; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 174, 176 and 374; Muslim Law

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT459

passed in Sessions Case No. 135/1997, whereby the appellant husband of the deceased was convicted under Section 498A/304B Indian Penal Code, 1860 and order of sentence dated 30.01.2002 whereby the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3

Dinesh Vitthal Patil and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 110(e)(g), 111; Mumbai Police Act - Sections 37(1)(3), 135; Maharashtra Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1995 - Section 3

148, Acquitted RCC/404/08 1860 149, 452, 353, Dt.30/10/09 332, 427, 504, 506 Mumbai Police Act. 37(1)(3)/135 4. 19/2008 Indian Penal Code 1860 143, 147, 341, Acquitted RCC/427/08 504, 506 Dt.17/7/09 Mumbai Police Act 37(1)(3)/135 5. 12/2010 Indian Penal Code 153(1)(B) … Writ Petition was posted for final hearing. 2. The Petitioners are challenging the notices issued to them under Sections 110(e)(g) & 111 of Criminal Procedure Code. Both the notices were issued on 6th September, 2010. Copies of

Kaliyaperumal and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B, 306 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR2003SC3828; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)682; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)337; 2003(51)BLJR1851; 2003CriLJ4321; JT2003(7)SC392; 2003(6)SCALE707; (2004)9SCC157; 2004(1)LC3(SC)

the marriage of the said parties. Explanation II - The expression 'valuable security' has the same meaning in Section 30 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).' 12. As was observed by this Court in Satvir Singh … J. 1. The appellants who were found guilty of offences punishable under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, unsuccessfully challenged the conviction before the Madras High Court.

M. Srinivasulu Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR2007SC3146; II(2007)DMC693SC; (2008)149PLR321; RLW2008(1)SC770; 2007(11)SCALE12; 2007AIRSCW5697

Pradesh High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Sentence of seven years was imposed on each count. By the impugned judgment conviction … consideration for the marriage of the said parties.Explanation II- The expression Valuable security' has the same meaning in Section 30 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).14. The prosecution version primarily rests on three documents i.e. exhibits

Afzalkhan @ Babu Murtuzakhan Pathan Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25(1), 25(1), 27 and 29; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 15; Evidence Act - Sections 25, 26, 30 and 32(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120(B), 120B, 121, 121(A), 122 , 123 and 147

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3223; (2007)2GLR2283; JT2007(7)SC200; RLW2007(4)SC2989; 2007(7)SCALE365; (2007)9SCC387

or about 4.4.2003 for commission of an alleged offence under Section 120(B), 121, 121(A), 122 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25(1)(b), 25(1)(c), 27 and 29 of the Arms Act in the D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad. The … POTA or TADA confession of a co-accused could not be taken into consideration even for the purpose of Section 30 of the Indian Evidence Act. It is not necessary to examine that aspect of the matter at this

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

it fails in its effect on the public. It must, therefore, so long as is part of the Indian Penal Code, be administered, if ever in the most exceptional cases of unparallelled atrocity or brutality.92. The Law Commission of … is this sentence that even the socially less sensitive Penal Code of 1860 has interposed, in its cruel tenderness, intervals, maxima and like softening features … is perilously near unconstitutionality.Court's interpretative function when faced with invalidatory alternative.38. Batra puts in issue the constitutionality of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, for short) while Sobhraj impugns the vires of Section 56. But