Advanced Search Results

Vinayak Laxman Vartak Vs. Laxmidas Vithaldas Ganatra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 288

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR447

No. 2 and the impugned order is hereby quashed. Criminal - issuance of process - Section 288 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petition filed against issuance of process against petitioner for committing offence under Section 288 - allegedly accused

Thommen Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 288 and 367; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96 and 99; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145

Reported in : AIR1958Ker74; 1958CriLJ509

defence - Sections 288, 302 and 367 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 96 ,99 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 145 of Evidence Act, 1872 - accused tried for offence of murder punishable under Section 302

Virender Kalra @ Tony Vs. State of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 288 and 336

Reported in : 103(2003)DLT64; 2003(66)DRJ702

The entire exercise will be in futility. The petition is allowed. The FIR and the proceedings stand quashed.dusty. Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 288, 336--Negligent conduct with respect to repairing building--Quashing of FIR--When petitioner was constructing house, some wooden

Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Abraham Phillip Parsha (Since D ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3 and 30(1); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 288 and 336

Reported in : 2009(1)KarLJ79

record. A case in Cr. No. 22 of 1996 is also registered under Sections 288 and 336 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the respondent 2. The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation after recording the evidence of both the parties and … K. Ramanna, J.1. This appeal is filed by the insurer under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the legality and correctness of judgment and award passed by

BALAJI Vs The State rep by its The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

facing trial inSpl.SC.No.288 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 354 D, 450, 342, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, 1860 r/w. 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 r/w. Section 4 of the TN Prohibition of … facing trial inSpl.SC.No.288 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 354 D, 450, 342, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, 1860 r/w. 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 r/w. Section 4 of the TN Prohibition of … Station, Kallakurichi District, Crime No.18 of 2022.2. Valli W/o.Mayavan3. Anitha W/o.Balaji ...RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Boota Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , - Sections 162 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 117, 127, 162, 164, 288 and 342; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 364, 394, 419, 465, 466 and 471

Reported in : AIR1979SC564; (1979)1SCC31; [1979]1SCR298

High Court acquitting him is confirmed. Criminal - Murder - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 364 and 394 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Respondents entered into agreement with X for purchase of land - Due to their inability to pay … the committing court and after his attention was drawn to the statement, the aforesaid statement was transferred under Section 288 and in law became substantive evidence. His statement before the committing court is Exhibit Ka-72. In this statement

Mary D'souza Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and Assistant Commission ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12(2), 18, 23(2) and 29(2); Karnataka Amendment of Act, 1961; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXI; Re Land Acquisition Act, 1906; Karnataka Government Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180 and 288; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : AIR1992Kant331; 1992(1)KarLJ464

any offence as is described in S. 175, S. 178, S. 179, S. 180 or S. 288 of the Indian Penal Code 1860, is committed in the view or presence of the said officer, the said officer may, after recording the … the Limitation Act, 1963, can be invoked for condoning the delay in making an application for reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, beyond the period of 90 days prescribed in the said section?2. The

Javvadhi Sesha Rao and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 148, 149, 193 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1908 - Sections 154, 162, 164 and 288; Evidence Act - Sections 157

Reported in : 1994(2)ALT(Cri)624

23. Order accordingly. Criminal - benefit of doubt - Sections 34, 120B, 148, 149, 193 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 154, 162, 164 and 288 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 157 of Indian Evidence Act

Public Prosecutor Vs. Shaik Ibrahim and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164, 176 and 288; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 30; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 330

Reported in : AIR1964AP548; 1964CriLJ636

and 164 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Section 30 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 330 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - witnesses gave contradictory statements before different authorities - Sessions Judge justified in rejecting statements as substantial evidence … of the evidence of these two witnesses, the Public Prosecutor filed an application before the Sessions Court under Section 288 Criminal Procedure Code stating that since P.Ws. 1 and 2 had resiled from their depositions before the committal

Tarlok Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 148, 149, 201, 302, 307 and 364; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33 and 288; Evidence Act, - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1974SC1797; 1974CriLJ1265; (1973)2SCC458

set aside. Criminal - defects in evidence - Sections 34, 148, 149, 201, 302, 307 and 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 33 and 288 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 33 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 -