Advanced Search Results

In Re: Beejay Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 244, 281(2), 633 and 633(2); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 7 and 9; Employees' Provident Fund Act; Central Excise Act; Sales Tax Act; Income Tax Act; Employees' State Insurances Act; Indian Textiles (Control) Order; Essential Commodities Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409

Reported in : [1983]53CompCas918(Delhi)

Income Tax Act, Employees' State Insurances Act, Indian Textiles (Control) Order, Essential Commodities Act and Section 409 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - whether Court had jurisdiction to grant relief to officer of company under Section 633 against liability for … was sought against apprehended claims in respect of negligence, breach of duty, etc., by the petitioners under s. 281(2) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. On an examination of various decided cases, A. K. Grover J. (as

A.m. Vs.state & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) applies to the investigation or inquiry into, or trial of, all offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) or “under any other law” (Section 4), this general rule being subject to any special procedure as … 34 the respondents since she was not their class teacher during the relevant period.19. In their statements under Section 281 Cr. PC, the respondents pleaded that the evidence was false and baseless. They claimed that the complaint had

Abdul Sayeed, Rafique, and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 302/34, 302, 147, 148, 149 and 307

1210 of 1998; and 281 of 2001 by which the appellants have been convicted under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called IPC) for committing the murders of Chand Khan and Shabir Khan, while setting aside their conviction … Nos.1191 of 1998; 1210 of 1998; and 281 of 2001 by which the appellants have been convicted under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called IPC) for committing the murders of Chand Khan and

Deepak Kumar and Another Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.281 dated 28.10.2009 under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') registered at Police Station Tauru, District Mewat and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. Learned … Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. **** SABINA, J. Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.281 dated 28.10.2009 under Sections 392

MD Asfaq @ Mohd Ashpak vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

No. 281/2023 dated 02.05.2023, registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, District North, New Delhi, under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”], and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. The facts, as emerging from the

Himanshu Bhatia & Ors. vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.281/2023 dated 23.05.2023 registered at PS.: Bhajanpura, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 2005 and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of

Palanpur Traders Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UC, 281 and 281(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1991)92CTR(Bom)125; [1991]187ITR132(Bom)

hearing - opportunity of hearing should have been given before passing impugned Order - impugned Order quashed. - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 [C.A. No. 45/1860].Sections 124-A, 153-A, 153-B, 292, 293 & 295A; [F.I. Rebello, Smt V.K. Tahilramani & A.S. Oka, … why the sale of the suit flat by them to the petitioners be not treated as void under section 281(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Copy of the notice was endorsed to the petitioners. Even though a show

State Vs. Rajinder Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 281

Reported in : 1984RLR415

is disposed of. Criminal - unlawful purpose - Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 and Section 397 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - respondent-accused had come along with X in ambassador car to concerned house - two canisters allegedly containing … opportunity to consider the point in issue in Lal Biak Singh v. The State, : 23(1983)DLT144 : 'THAT section 281 Cr P.C. makes it clear beyond doubt that while the court of Session and all Magistrates except the

Vijay Pal Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Uttarkhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Haldwani in Sessions Trial No.281 of 1991 for offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC'), Section 304B read with Section 34 of IPC, Section 498A

Emperor Vs. Jinga Gamaji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1925)27BOMLR111

of 1898), Section 562 - First offender-Release on probation of good conduct-Indian Penal Code (Act XL V of 1860), Section 281.; A first offender is entitled to the benefit of Section 562 of the Criminal Procedure Code, provided the … Norman Macleod, Kt., C.J.1. The accused was convicted under Section 381, Indian Penal Code, of the theft of gold and silver ornaments and clothes belonging to the complainant in whose service he