Advanced Search Results

Omprakash Sahni Vs. Jai Shankar Chaudhary And Anr. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Sessions Trial No.280/2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120-B, 506 respectively read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘the IPC’) and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short, ‘the 1959 Act’) 3.

Salman Qureshi vs State (Gnct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

190/2015, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishabe under Sections 392/397/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC’), wherein the applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 397 of the IPC … dated 24.04.2026, passed by the learned AdditionalSessions Judge (NDPS Judge), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, in SC No. 280/2017, arising out of FIR bearing no. 06/2017, registered at PoliceStation Swaroop Nagar, Delhi whereby, the applicant has been

C.A. Pious Vs. the State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Prisoners' Release on Probation Act, 1938; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 55 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 432, 432(6), 433 and 433A; Kerala Prison Rules, 1958 - Rules 225, 225(2), 280A, 452B, 453, 455 and 461; Constitution of India - Articles 20(1), 72 and 161

Reported in : AIR2007SC3221; 2007CriLJ4697; JT2007(11)SC344; 2007(4)KLT380(SC); 2007(11)SCALE123; (2007)8SCC312

life imprisonment in Central Jail, Kannur in view of the conviction for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC). He made a claim before the State Government that the Kerala Prison Rules, 1958 … 461. Learned Counsel for the State on the other hand supported the order of the High Court.5. Rule 280-A provides for suspension of sentence as empowered under Section 432(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in

Rakesh Mittal Thr His General Attorney T R Mittal vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

complaint of T.R. Mittal (the Principal of the petitioner in Crl.M.C.280/2015) alleging offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the investigating agency had frozen the account of Delhi Cooperative Housing Finance Corporation (DCHFC) (petitioner in Crl.

Delhi Cooperative Housing Finance Corpn. Ltd (Thr Its Senior Manager) ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

complaint of T.R. Mittal (the Principal of the petitioner in Crl.M.C.280/2015) alleging offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the investigating agency had frozen the account of Delhi Cooperative Housing Finance Corporation (DCHFC) (petitioner in Crl.

Ratanchand Radhakisondas Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154 and 423; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 467 and 471; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 7 and 9; ;Bombay Sales Tax (Registration, Licensing and Authorisation) Rules, 1954 - Rule 13(2)

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1161; 1960CriLJ461

Tax Act, 1953, and is a valuable security within the definition of that term under Section 30 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The mere fact that the purchasing dealer has no licence under Section 12 of the Act will not … the information given, if it is reduced to writing, inadmissible. Emperor v. Chittar Singh (1925) I.L.R. 47 All. 280 and Emperor v. Nazir Ahmed (1945) 47 Bom. L.R. 245, P.c., referred to.;The 'K' Form of the Bombay

Mohd. Iqbal Vs. N. Prabhakar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : LimitationProperty

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 6, 8, 27 and 28 - Sechdule - Articles 64, 65, 142 and 144; Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 4(2), 5, 8(1 and 2), 9, 10 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 25, 148, 324 and 448; Madras Act, 1864 - Sections 8; HMC Act - Sections 280; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 13, 33 and 151 - Order 6, Rule 4; Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1972; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD385; 1998(4)ALT469

Naidu v. Jagannath, 1994 (1) SCC 1 wherein the Supreme Court while considering the scopeof Section 25 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 17 of the Contract Act, Article 136 of the Constitution of India and Sections 33 and 13 … to the Assistant Commissioner, MCH, Hyderabad. Ex.B17 is the xerox copy of notice of transfer of property under Section 280 of HMC Act given by N. Veeraswamy Naidu. Ex.BIS is the xerox copy of the receipt No.6134 issued

Ajay Bakliwal Vs. State and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468(2), 469(1), 482 and 483; Constitution of India - Article 227; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 40 and 56; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 228

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT139; 2001(60)DRJ163; 2002(79)ECC447

Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 40 and 56 r/w Sections 482 & 483 of Cr.P.C., 1973--r/w Section 280, Indian Penal Code, 1860--Limitation--Offence: failure to appear before the concerned officer of Enforcement Directorate on 9 Nov/11 December, … of summons issued under section 40 would be punishable under section 56 and not under the provisions of Indian Penal Code. On the point of limitation, it may be noticed that offence under section 228 IPC is punishable with

N.C. Bhatt Vs. Controller, Food and Civil Supplies

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Anti-Corruption Bureau Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 280, 392 and 466; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374, 389 and 389(1)

Reported in : (1998)1GLR758

inasmuch as that respondent, a Police Inspector, was convicted for offences under Ss. 392, 280 and 466 of IPC while the other respondents were convicted under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act. It was expressed that … inasmuch as that respondent, a Police Inspector, was convicted for offences under Ss. 392, 280 and 466 of IPC while the other respondents were convicted under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act. It was expressed that … a discretionary power under Ss. 389(1) and 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code should not be exercised for trifle reasons. In the said case, the

Pratham Chouhan & Ors. vs State (Gnct of Delhi) & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Sections 76 and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [corresponding to Sections 354B and 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860] arose on account of a misunderstanding between the parties stemming from the neighbourhood dispute. They further state that … Kunj, South. Ms. Ritika, Advocate.CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 11.05.20261. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, … Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [“CrPC”]), seeking the quashing of FIR No. 280/2025, dated 01.07.2025, registered at Police Station Vasant Kunj South, District South West,