Advanced Search Results

Dr. Sunil Clifford Daniel Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 302, 201, 364; Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Section 28; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 311, 313, 162(2)

Judge, Ludhiana in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1996, convicting the appellant under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’), and awarded him a sentence to undergo RI for life and to … June 1994.B. As per the appellant, a petition for divorce by mutual consent was filed on 20.2.1996, under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 in the Court of the District Judge, Ludhiana, and both parties therein,

R. Balakrishna Pillai Vs. State

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2), 5(3) and 6; Evidence Act - Sections 145; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 29 and 161 to 165-A; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 28, 28(1), 28(4) and 52; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 271, 271(1), 274(1), 275, 277, 297, 297(1) and 297(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 30, 31, 161, 162, 170(5), 173, 173(2), 197, 197(1), 239, 240, 291 and 321; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 227 and 251A; Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(1)

Reported in : 1996CriLJ757

to the word 'document'. Though the Criminal Procedure Code does not define the word 'document' Section 29 of the Indian Penal Code defines it as follows :'29. 'Document'.-The word 'document' denotes any matter expressed or described upon any substance by … clearly shows that the legislature was alive to the fact that the provisions under Chapter IX of the Penal Code, 1860, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (Act 2 of 1947) and the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952, are required … by him under either the 1961 or the 1922 Act was bad in law as being violative of Section 28(4) of the 1922 Act or Article 20(1). The Supreme Court, on an elaborate consideration, answered the question thus

K. Hashim Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 28, 120A, 120B, 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D and 489E; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 293 and 306; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 114 and 133; Court of Criminal Appeal Act, 1907

Reported in : AIR2005SC128; 2005CriLJ143; JT2004(10)SC478; 2004(9)SCALE422; (2005)1SCC237

judgment upheld their conviction for offences punishable under Section 120B read with Section 489A, 489C and 489D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').3. The prosecution accusations as unfolded during trial are as follows:On receiving secret information, the … and, therefore, his evidence was really of no assistance to the prosecution. The effect of Explanation 2 of Section 28 IPC has not been considered in the proper perspective. Even if it is accepted that an expert's evidence

Vijay Kumar Ghai Vs. The State Of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

and arising out of Bowbazar Police Station Case No.168 dated 28.03.2013 under Sections 420, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”). By the said judgment, the High Court dismissed the prayer for 1 quashing … of Learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kolkata and arising out of Bowbazar Police Station Case No.168 dated 28.03.2013 under Sections 420, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”). By the said

Scania Commercial Vehicles India Pvt Ltd Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

its employees in their individual capacity it has committed the offences as defined under section 406 and 420 Indian Penal Code.” (Emphasis added) The afore-quoted paragraphs are all that become germane for a consideration of the issue in the … time of making initial promise being absent, 4 (2015) 8 SCC29315 no offence under Section 420 of the Penal Code, 1860 can be said to have been made out.” (Emphasis supplied) In the case of SATISCHANDRA RATANLAL SHAH v. … must be dishonestly induced to; a) deliver property to any person; or 28 b) make, alter or destroy valuable security or anything signed or sealed

State Vs. Bansi Dhar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Trial court convicted the three respondents and held them guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and all the three respondents were sentenced individually for the period already undergone … CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by the State under Section 377(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as, Cr.P.C.) for enhancing the sentence awarded … by a sharp weapon. Further PW 13.Rajinder Kumar has deposed that on 28.9.1995, five sealed packets were received in the office from P.S. Mehrauli in

State of Karnataka by Nazarabad Police, Mysore Vs. N. Somashekar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 28, 174, 378 and 386; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 300, 302, 304, 341 and 506

Reported in : ILR1998KAR53; 1998(1)KarLJ551

Acts/Rules/Orders:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 28, 174, 378 and 386;Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 201, 300, 302, 304, 341 and 506Cases Referred:State of Uttar Pradesh v. Krishna Gopal and … Acts/Rules/Orders:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 28, 174, 378 and 386;Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 201, 300, 302, 304, 341 and 506Cases Referred:State

Satbir Singh Vs. The State Of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

For the purpose of this section, “dowry death” shall have the same meaning as in section 304B of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)17. This Court, in the case of Bansi Lal v. State of Haryana, (2011) 11 SCC359 … extent. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ………………………..CJI. (N.V. RAMANA) …………………………. J.(ANIRUDDHA BOSE) NEW DELHI; MAY28 2021 28

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Hafiz Mohammad Ismail and

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 28, 482 and 486

Reported in : AIR1960SC669; 1960CriLJ1017; (1961)63PLR359; [1960]2SCR911

on the lines indicated above. 9. Cases remanded. Criminal - counterfeit - Sections 28, 482 and 486 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal against Order of High Court acquitting respondents from charge of counterfeiting products of appellant company under … 486 in that behalf and the definition of 'counterfeit' in S. 28 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Section 28 is in these terms - 'A person is said to 'counterfeit' who causes one thing to resemble another

Puttasiddamma @ Puttasiddi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

would be the sufferer and also it would lead to a miscarriage of justice.23. Whereas, Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, no particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of … 2 / appellants herein, for offences punishable under Sections 324 and 342 read with Section 34 of the IPC, 1860. Further, Accused Nos.1 and 2 have been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in … - HCGP) 2 This Criminal Appeal filed under Sec.374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, by the Advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment … the Advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment dated 28.05.2014, passed by I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.50/2013 and acquit