Advanced Search Results

Umayal Ramanathan Vs. Income-tax Officer, City Circle-i (2), Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 139, 271, 271(1), 273, 273A, 273A(1), 276C, 277, 278, 279 and 279(1A); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 420

Reported in : [1992]194ITR462(Mad)

accused) and three others (accused Nos. 1 to 3) for offences under section 120B read with section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sections 276C, 277 and 278 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitioner owned vacant land to the … sub-section (8) of section 139 or section 215 or section 217 or the penalty imposed or imposable under section 273, if he is satisfied that such person - ... (b) in the case referred to in clause (ii),

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ for short) and Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81 and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, … Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1281 of 2012 whereby the High Court dismissed his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) seeking regular bail in C.R. No.

Mohanlal S. Doppa Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139(8), 217(1A), 245A, 245B, 245C, 245C(1), 245D, 245D(1), 245D(3), 245D(4), 245D(6), 245E, 245F, 245F(1), 245F(2), 245F(3), 245H, 245H(1), 245I, 256(1), 271(1) and 273; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : [2002]253ITR33(Guj)

as it may think fit to impose, immunity from prosecution for any offence under this Act or under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or under any other Central Act for the time being in force and also from … and 1977-78 :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the levy of penalty under Section 273(c) was legal and valid in law ?'4. The relevant facts as found by the Tribunal and incorporated in

Sakshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15(3), 17, 18, 19, 20(1), 21 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 375, 376, 376(2), 376A to 376D, 377, 506 and 511; ;Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35 and 35(2); Customs Act - Sections 104; ;Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(1); Offences against Person Act, 1861 - Sections 18, 20, 42 and 47; ;Aliens Control Act, 1991 - Sections 25(5); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(1), 167(2), 273, 327(1), 327(2) and 715.1

Reported in : AIR2004SC3566; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)504; 2004(2)BLJR1378; 98(2004)CLT491(SC); 2004CriLJ2881; 112(2004)DLT457(SC); 2004(77)DRJ390; RLW2004(3)SC402; 2004(6)SCALE15; (2004)5SCC518; 2004 INSC383

set out in prayer (A) aforesaid as offences under Section 375, 376 and 376A to 376D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860;C) Issue such other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem appropriate in the present facts … by the child.28. The Law Commission, in its response, did not accept the said request in view of Section 273 Cr.P.C. as in its opinion the principle of the said Section which is founded upon natural justice, cannot

Mahesh Ramchandra Jadhav and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 270, 273, 337 and 353; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 397; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2(1), 7, 16, 20 and 25

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR535; 1999(5)BomCR113; (1999)1BOMLR634; 1999CriLJ2310; 2000(1)MhLj648

is required to be accepted and the charge sheet is required to be quashed. Hence the order :-- Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 270-273, 337 r/w Section 34 - Food Adulteration - Offence also punishable under the Prevention of

Esher Singh Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(3), 4, 4(2), 5, 6 and 15; Indian Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120A, 120A(2), 120B, 136, 143, 149, 211, 224, 273 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)270; JT2004(3)SC391; 2004(3)SCALE267; (2004)11SCC585; [2004] 2 SCR 1180

filed against A-1 to A-9 for offences punishable under Sections 120B and 302 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), Section 3(3) of TADA and Section 27 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 (in … of IPC.21. Chapter XVII of the Code deals with 'charge'. Section 211 thereof deals with content of charge. Section 273 appearing in Chapter XXIII provides that evidence is to be taken in presence of the accused. The person

Mohanlal S. Doppa Vs. Cit

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]253ITR33(Guj)

as it may think fit to impose, immunity from prosecution for any offence under this Act or under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or under any other Central Act for the time being in force and also from … powers under other provisions of the Act empowering him to levy penalty such as under section 271(1)(a) or section 273 or under section 139(8) of the Act for levying interest, because all such powers were very much available

income-tax Officer Vs. Dharamchand Surana

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 273(A) and (C), 276C and 276C(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420 and 511

Reported in : [1995]216ITR678(Mad)

in E.O.C.C. No. 705 of 1983 for the offences under sections 193 and 420 read with section 511, Indian Penal Code, 1860, and section 276C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The respondent was carrying on business in jewellery and … Department after the seizure of the records, the return will not be voluntary within the meaning of section 273A and as the assessee had to file the return under compelling circumstances, otherwise, he would be dealt with

Jinnappa Pareesh Hulakund Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 27 and 134; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 494 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 205, 273, 278 and 465

Reported in : ILR2001KAR607

the appellant fails and is accordingly dismissed as devoid of merits. Criminal - murder - Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - accused killed wife with sickle - incident witnessed by many persons - accused sentenced to undergo life … of a child witness, an accomplice or any others of an analogous character'.20. While drawing our attention to Section 273 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the learned Counsel for the appellant has vehemently contended that the evidence has

income-tax Officer, Circle I, B-ward, Hyderabad Vs. Shivlal Dhulichand ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 27, 271(1), 273, 274, 276(1) and 277 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 196

Reported in : [1990]184ITR414(AP)

(1), 273, 274, 276 (1) and 277 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Sections 193 and 196 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal by Income-tax Department against acquittal of respondent - respondents were partners in firm who were charges … succeeded PW-1, imposed a penalty of Rs. 3,000 as per exhibit P-14 order dated March 26, 1987, under section 273. He also passed an order, exhibit P-15 under section 271(1)(c) and imposed a penalty of Rs. 85,000 for