Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 272 · Page 1 of about 177 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 11 1984

Tulsiram Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-1984

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 9A; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 11(1), 13(2) and 16(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 and 276

Reported in : AIR1985SC299; 1984CriLJ1731; 1985(1)Crimes313(SC); 1985MPLJ127(SC); 1984(2)SCALE578; (1984)4SCC487; [1985]1SCR949

13 (2) and 16 (1) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Sections 272 and 276 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant accused of adulterating soyabean oil convicted by Magistrate under Section 16 (1) (a) (i) - appeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2013

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ for short) and Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81 and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, … Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1281 of 2012 whereby the High Court dismissed his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) seeking regular bail in C.R. No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1943

Emperor Vs. Suleman Shamji

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-1943

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR895

application in revision against the conviction of the accused by the Chief Presidency Magistrate under Section 272 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The conviction, in my opinion, proceeds on two serious errors. Section 272 provides that whoever adulterates any article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 15 2006

S.M. Milkosh Limited Vs. State of Raj.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-15-2006

Subject : Food Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 11(1), 13, 13(2), 13(3), 14A and 16(1A); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 to 276

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1976; RLW2006(2)Raj1179; 2006(2)WLC358

[under Sub-section (2-b)[ is produced in any proceeding under this Act, or under Sections 272 to 276 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), it shall not be necessary in such proceeding to produce any part of the sample

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1983

The Food and Sanitary Inspector, Giddalur Panchayat Vs. Koppu Subbarat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-08-1983

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 166; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 and 276; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1801

Appeal allowed. Criminal - mandatory requirement - Article 166 of Constitution of India, Sections 272 and 276 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 360 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Rule 18 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - whether compliance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1981

State of Maharashtra Vs. Ramlal S/O Hanmantlal Malpani and ors. and Om ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-1981

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 and 284; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 13(5) and 16(1)

Reported in : 1982(2)BomCR13

of 1978 and 55 of 1978 is confirmed. Criminal - food poisoning - Sections 272 and 284 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 2, 7, 10, 10 (1), 10 (2), 13 (5) and 16 (1) of Prevention of Food … police agency who seized the food articles stated above filed a criminal case against the accused persons under section 272 and section 284 of the Indian Penal Code bearing Criminal Case No. 161 of 1976. It appears that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1965

Mangaldas Raghavji Ruparel and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-08-1965

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Criminal Law; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 182, 510 and 537; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 and 276; The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 4(1), 7, 10, 10(3), 11, 13(1), 13(5), 16(1), 17(1) and 19(1); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 12, 13, 24, 65, 66 and 83(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 8(1), 23(1), 23(1-A) and 24(1); Madras Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1918

Reported in : AIR1966SC128; 1966CriLJ106; [1965]2SCR894

of the facts stated therein in any proceeding under this Act or under sections 272 to 276 of the Indian Penal Code : Provided that any document purporting to be a certificate signed by the Director of the Central Food … Mangaldas and the two appellants Daryanomal and Kodumal in Crl. A. 113 of 1963 for the contravention of section 7(v) of The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in which they

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1994

Joseph Kurian Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 272, 300, 302, 304 and 328; Kerala Abkari Act - Sections 2 (10), 55 and 57

Reported in : AIR1995SC4a; [1994]Supp4SCR122

run concurrently.16. In this manner these two appeals are disposed of. Criminal - intoxication - Section 272 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - in order to establish offence under Section 272 prosecution has to prove that articles involved was food

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2005

Chami Vs. Excise Inspector

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-14-2005

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Abkari Act, 1077- Sections 3(8), 27, 29, 29(2), 30, 31, 32, 36, 50, 55, 57, 57A, 57A(1), 57A(3) and 57B; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2 and 22; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272, 273 and 320; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Poisons Act, 1919 - Sections 2 and 3; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 26A; Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002 - Rules 6, 8 and 9(2); The Kerala Poisons Rules, 1996 - Rule 2; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT511

section and Section 57B, the expression 'grievous hurt' shall have the same meaning as in Section 320 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act 45 of 1860).So, Section 57A will be applicable only if the toddy is adulterated with noxious … made under Section 29, Clause (k), when such admixture shall not amount to the offence of adulteration under (Section 272 of the Indian Penal Code];Section 57A deals with adulteration of liquor or intoxicating drug with noxious substances. Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1965

State of Gujarat Vs. Ranchhod Bhula Rabari

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-22-1965

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 12, 13(5), 16(1) and 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272, 273, 274, 275 and 276

Reported in : AIR1966Guj83; 1966CriLJ411; (1965)GLR406

of the facts stated therein in any proceeding under this Act or under Sections 272 to 276 of the Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860):Provided that any document purporting to be a certificate signed by the Director of the … the other by the private complainant--are against the acquittal of respondent Ranchhod Bhula Rabari, who was prosecuted under Section 16(1)(a) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The two grounds given for acquittal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial