Advanced Search Results
Esher Singh Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Mar-15-2004
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(3), 4, 4(2), 5, 6 and 15; Indian Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120A, 120A(2), 120B, 136, 143, 149, 211, 224, 273 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 136
2004(2)ALD(Cri)270; JT2004(3)SC391; 2004(3)SCALE267; (2004)11SCC585; [2004] 2 SCR 1180
filed against A-1 to A-9 for offences punishable under Sections 120B and 302 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), Section 3(3) of TADA and Section 27 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 (in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) (Central Government) Vs. Students Islamic Movemen ...
Delhi
Mar-26-2002
Constitution
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(3), 4(1) and 5(1); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1968 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 25 and 26; Evidence Act - Sections 25, 27, 123 and 162; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122, 123, 124, 124A, 147, 148, 153, 153A, 153B, 295A, 302, 307, 338, 420, 467, 468 and 505(1); Explosive Substances Act - Sections 3, 4 and 5; ;Railways Act - Sections 150(2) and 151
99(2002)DLT147; 2002(63)DRJ563
5 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1968, Articles 19, 25 and 26 of Constitution of India, Evidence Act, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 3, 4 and 5 of Explosive Substances Act and Sections 150 (2) and 151 of Railway Act - … the knowledge of the different investigating agencies, thereforee, the reception of the said statements would be barred under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. Reliance is placed on Pulukuri Kottya and Ors. v. Emperor 1947 Privy Council, 67.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRangnath Sharma Vs. Satendra Sharma and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-20-2008
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304 and 364
2008(11)SCALE504; 2008(2)LC1133(SC); 2008AIRSCW5914
Crl. Appeal 553/2001 was tried for offences punishable under Section 364, Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 while Pankaj Sharma and Ramakant Sharma,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lachman Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Jul-28-2006
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304 and 307
AIR2006SC2763; 2006CriLJ4041; JT2006(7)SC60; RLW2007(1)SC196; 2006(7)SCALE423; (2006)10SCC524
respectively) who faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). Additionally, Dev Singh was tried for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 307 IPC, … on the basis of which formal FIR relating to alleged commission of offences under Sections 302/307/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short 'Arms Act') was registered in Police Station Shahabad at 11.50 p.m.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShivjee Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Jul-30-2008
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 325, 337 and 447
2008(10)SCALE530; (2008)11SCC631; 2008(2)LC1025(SC); 2008AIRSCW7487; 2008(4)LH(SC)2855
No. 1494 of 2004 were found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') and Section 147. Similar was the conviction recorded in case of Satya Narain Singh, one … Criminal Appeal No. 484 of 2006 was convicted for offence punishable under Sections 302 and 148 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short `Arms Act'). Appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 1494 of 2004 were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Virendra Prasad
Supreme Court of India
Feb-03-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 300, 302, 304 and 307; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27 and 28
AIR2004SC1517; 2004CriLJ1373; JT2004(2)SC89; 2004(2)SCALE175; (2004)9SCC37
Court holding that the respondent Virendra Prasad was guilty of offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC') and not under Section 302 IPC as was contended by the prosecution. Custodial sentence … record found the accused persons guilty. While accused Ram Prasad was found guilty of offence punishable under Sections 27 and 28 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short 'the Arms Act'), accused respondent Virendra was found guilty
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBikau Pandey and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Nov-25-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 141, 148, 149 and 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Juvenile Act
2004(1)BLJR158; [2005(3)JCR267(SC)]; JT2004(6)SC47; 2003(10)SCALE17; (2003)12SCC616; 2004(1)LC234(SC)
persons, faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 302 read with Sections 149, 148 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'). Accused No. 9 (appellant No. 5 in the present appeals.) additionally faced trial for … 'IPC'). Accused No. 9 (appellant No. 5 in the present appeals.) additionally faced trial for offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short the 'Arms Act'). Accused No. 2 Mahendra Rai (Appellant No. 8
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajinder Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Jun-05-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 300, 302, 304 and 326; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27
AIR2006SC2257; 2006CriLJ2926; 2006(3)KLT218(SC); 2006(6)SCALE454; (2006)5SCC425
the appellant by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hissar, for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and Section 27 of the Arms Act 1959, (in short the 'Arms Act'). The appellant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalmiki Singh Vs. Ram Chander Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-18-2008
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 307
2009CriLJ318; [2009(1)JCR64(SC)]; 2008(12)SCALE580; (2008)10SCC218
the accused persons was found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') and sentenced to undergo RI for 5 years. Additionally, respondents were convicted for offence punishable … short `IPC') and sentenced to undergo RI for 5 years. Additionally, respondents were convicted for offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short `Arms Act') and sentenced to undergo RI for 3 years.2. Background
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaban Bandu Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Apr-15-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 300, 302, 304, 324, 504 and 506
2009(57)BLJR2328; JT2009(13)SC662; 2009(6)SCALE6; (2009)12SCC685; 2009(2)ShimLC127; 2009(6)LC2687(SC)
the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Sections 302 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'), while directing acquittal of two co-accused persons who had faced trial for the alleged … and Aba. Information given by Accused No. 4 Bandu was recorded in the presence of panch witnesses under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the `Evidence Act'). This memorandum of panchanama is at Exhibit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »