Advanced Search Results

Moreshwar Savey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act - Sections 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 11, 11(1), 145, 161, 169, 173(8), 190, 193, 226, 227, 228, 233, 234, 234(1), 397, 460 and 482; General Clauses Act 1897 - Sections 10 and 21; Delhi Special Police Establisment Act, 1946; Evidence Act - Sections 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114, 120A, 120-B, 141, 147, 149, 153-A-B, 201, 295, 295-A, 297, 323, 332, 336, 337, 338, 342, 379, 391, 390, 392, 394, 395, 397, 406, 408, 409, 427 and 505; Ayodhya Act, 1993; Limitation Act 1908; Companies Act - Sections 630; Constitution of India - Article 216, 233 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1765

in the Schedule below :SCHEDULE1. Case relating to Crime No. 198/92 under Sections 153A, 153B and 505 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, P.S. Ram Janam Bhumi, Ayodhya, district Faizabad, State v. Sri Ashok Senghal and others.10. Before the Court of … (Moreshwar Savey v. State of U.P. and another) the revisionist is to be charged with offences punishable Under Sections 147, 153A, 153B, 295, 295A, 505 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to … No. 247 of 1992 under Sections 147, 323, 427, IPC.(28) Crime No. 267 of 1992 under Section 394/427, IPC.(29) Crime No. 268 of 1992 under

Prasanth P.M vs the DI2022STRICT Police Chief

Court : Kerala

thepetitioner as the accused as having committed the offences punishable under sections 279, 337, 338 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') apart from sections 34A and 34B of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The final report … report in Crime No.84 of 2022 arraying thepetitioner as the accused as having committed the offences punishable under sections 279, 337, 338 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') apart from sections 34A … THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(CRL.) NO. 267 OF 2022 PETITIONER: PRASANTH P.M AGED 35 YEARS PUTHILLAM HOUSE, PARANNUR, CHOONDAL,

Prasanth.P.M. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

thepetitioner as the accused as having committed the offences punishable under sections 279, 337, 338 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') apart from sections 34A and 34B of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The final report … report in Crime No.84 of 2022 arraying thepetitioner as the accused as having committed the offences punishable under sections 279, 337, 338 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') apart from sections 34A … THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(CRL.) NO. 267 OF 2022 PETITIONER: PRASANTH P.M AGED 35 YEARS PUTHILLAM HOUSE, PARANNUR, CHOONDAL,

Present: Mr. Daldeep Singh Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

AAG, Punjab. **** SABINA, J. Appellant had faced trial in FIR No.71 dated 9.5.2003 under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short) and Section 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('Act' for short).registered at Police

Ramesh Alias Dapinder Singh Vs. The State Of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Una, Himachal Pradesh, in respect of offences punishable under Sections 302, 323, 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘the IPC’, for short).4. The basic facts leading to the aforementioned Trial, as stated by PW1- Sukhwinder Singh,

Olga Kazireva Vs. the State (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1993 - Sections 267, 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13; Cofeposa Act, 1974; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)1040; 91(2001)DLT549

remand to police custody.5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has got disputed that the Court exercising powers under Section 267 of the Code can require the attendance of a prisoner including a detenu under preventive detention. However, his … Delhi remanding the petitioner to police custody in case RC No.5/2001 under Section 120-B read with Section 420 IPC and Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner … custody in case RC No.5/2001 under Section 120-B read with Section 420 IPC and Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. I have

Mukesh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 267 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395 and 397

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1960

to the production of an accused in the course of an inquiry, trial or other proceeding under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel also invited the attention of the Court to Form No. 36 of Schedule … in the course of an inquiry, trial or other proceeding under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel also invited the attention of the Court … by the learned counsel for the applicants that such warrants could not be issued under the provisions of Section 267. Cr. P.C., during the investigation, as the provisions are confined to the production of an accused in the

K.V. Krishnamurthy Iyer and ors. Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 267, 439, 526, 526(1), 526(2) and 561A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409 and 477A

Reported in : AIR1954SC406

the order quashing the charges is upheld. Criminal - De novo trial - Sections 409 and 477-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 267 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Appeal against High Court direction for quashing of all

Krishnabiharilal Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1956CriLJ233

be inadequate.(2) Where in any trial of an offence punishable under Section 165A, Indian Penal Code (Act 45-of 1860), it is proved that any gratification (other than legal remuneration) or any valuable thing, has been given or … of Corruption Act lays down:(1) Where in any trial of offence punishable under Section 161 or Section 165, Indian Penal Code it is proved that an accused person has accepted or obtained or has agreed to accept or attempted … he then was) in - 'State v. Minaketan Patnaik. AIR 1952 Orissa 267 (C), 8. 4 purports to lay down only that a Court shall

State Vs. Bansi Dhar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Trial court convicted the three respondents and held them guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and all the three respondents were sentenced individually for the period already undergone … CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by the State under Section 377(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as, Cr.P.C.) for enhancing the sentence awarded … Rs.500 respectively with default stipulation. The accused persons preferred Criminal Appeal No. 267 of 2003. At the time of hearing of the appeal learned counsel