Advanced Search Results

M/S. B.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(6), 40, 47, 53, 73, 162, 245, 246, 248, 258, 266, 269(3), 276, 286(3), 292, 293, 298, 301, 302, 303 and 304; Lotteries(Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12(3); Government of India Act, 1935; U.P. Unauthorized Lottery(Prevention) Act, 1995 - Sections 8;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294A; English Lotteries Act, 1823; Common Wealth of Australian Constitution Act, - Sections 21, 73 and 92; Lotteries and Amusements Act, 1976; Lotteries and Art Unions Act, 1901-1929;

Reported in : AIR1999SC1867; JT1999(3)SC431; 1999(3)SCALE171; [1999]2SCR1111

the Government of India Act, 1935 the adoption of Laws Order 1937 has included in Section 294A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 an exception to the offence of keeping a lottery office by excluding from the scope thereof 'any lottery … which led to bring in Article 298 in the present from. His submission is that the draft Article 266 which is now Article 289 provided for trade and business of States being subject matter of union taxation.

Indian Bank vs Mohan Murti Shandilya

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

criminal complaint under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’) read with Sections 405/409/219/420/467/471/477-A/34/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) read with Section 29 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and EnforcementSigning Date:09.02.2026 CRL.M.C. 266/2009

Present: Mr. Sandeep Punchhi Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.' for short) for quashing of FIR No.266 dated 24.10.2007 under Section 498-A, 496 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short).registered at Police Station City Sangrur (Annexure P-1) and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom. Learned

Karamjit Kaur and Others Vs. Dharam Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

titled as 'Dharam Singh vs.Karamjit Kaur and others under Sections 325, 452, 427, 504, 506, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) read with Section 3 (1) (x).4 of the Prevention of Atrocities and S.T.Act, (the Act

Emperor Vs. Kanayalal Mohanlal Gujar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1939Bom455; (1939)41BOMLR977

conviction and sentence must be set aside. The fine must be refunded. Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 266 - False measure-'False', meaning of-Whether there could be fraudulent intent where seller and purchaser are aware of actual … C.J.1. This is an application for revision by one Kanayalal Gujar against his conviction under Section 266 of the Indian Penal Code of the offence of being in possession of a false weight or measure known toi be false with

Bansidhar Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 266; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1998 - Sections 135(2), 153, 155, 173, 190(1) and 537

Reported in : AIR1959Raj191; 1959CriLJ1112

the time of recovery. The police challaned Bansidhar and Radheylal for offences tinder Sections 265 and 266 of the Indian Penal Code. Radheylal was acquitted but Bansi-dhar was convicted and sentenced as mentioned above.3. Bansidhar denied that false weights were … is a revision application on behalf of Banshidhar who was convicted by the Magistrate First Class, Sambhar under Section 266 I. P. C. and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of

Meenakshi Bhatnagar & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of FIR No. 266/2014 dated 15.03.2014, registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, New Delhi, under Sections 323/354/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional … person. SI Vipin, PS: Mukherjee Nagar.CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 19.05.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

B.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 298, 301, 303; Lotteries(Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 4 and 5; India Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 4 and 294A

Reported in : (2000)1GLR242; (1999)9SCC700; [2000]120STC302(SC)

the Government of India Act, 1935 the adoption of Laws Order, 1937 has included in Section 294A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 an exception to the offence of keeping a lottery office by excluding from the scope thereof 'any lottery … which led to bring in Article 298 in the present form. His submission is that the draft Article 266 which is now Article 289 provided for trade and business of States being subject-matter of Union taxation. To

Laxman Moreshwar Mahurkar Vs. Balkrishna Jagannath Kinikar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 202, 203, 204, 226, 266(3) and 282; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109 and 500; Law Officers (Conditions of Service) Rules - Rule 189; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197; Specific Relief Act - Sections 45; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

Reported in : AIR1961Bom167; (1960)62BOMLR880; ILR1960Bom941

petitioner's instance before a Magistrate in Nagpur for an offence under Section 500 read with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner concedes that the grant or assistance to Government servants who have to institute or defend civil … expenditure made under heads covered by it would be deemed to be properly authorised by law under Article 266(3) of the Constitution. 'It may be, as Mr. Pathak contends, that the Appropriation Acts are no substitute for

Emperor Vs. Harak Chand Marwari

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1918All174; (1918)ILR40All84

the Local Government may appeal if it deems fit. Let the record be returned. Act No. XLV of 1860 (Indian Penal Code), Section 266 - Possession of false measure--Intent--Acquittal--Criminal Procedure Code, Section 438--Practice. - - One knows … or less connected with each other. One Harak Chand was prosecuted on two charges under Section 266 of the Indian Penal Code before a Magistrate in respect of two measures of length which he was using in the shop. The