Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(40), 119, 139(1), 139(4), 139(8), 140A, 142(1), 143(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 154, 155, 156, 208, 210, 215(4), 216, 220(2A), 234A to 234C, 243B(3), 245C, 245C(1C), 245C(1D), 245D, 245D(2A) to (2D), 245D(4), 245D(6), 245D(6A), 245F(1), 245F(2), 245H, 245H(1), 250, 254, 260, 262, 263 and 264; Finance Act, 1995; Finance Act, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975

Reported in : AIR2003SC3942; (2003)179CTR(SC)362; (2003)2MLJ65(SC); (2003)3SCC57; [2002]SUPP5SCR387

prosecution and penalty. The immunity extends not only to penal provisions of the Act but to offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC'), or under any other Central Act for the time being in force. Benefit of … 154 orSection 155 or Section 250 or Section 254 or Section 260or Section 262 or Section 263 or Section 264 or an order of the Settlement Commission under Sub-section (4) of Section 245D, the amount on which interest

Ctr Manufacturing Industries Limited Vs. Sergi Transformer Explosion P ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

for recording of finding that an offence under section 193 read with section 191 or section 209 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 has been committed by the respondents and for making a complaint in writing through competent officer of this … enquiry is cited with approval in paragraph-11 thereof. In MannalaSardarmal Jain v. Kishan Jodhraj Maharaj, AIR 1959 MP 264, standard of proof required in cases of perjury is looked into. In AIR 1957 AP 832 (In Re:

Ctr Manufacturing Industries Limited Vs. Sergi Transformer Explosion P ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

for recording of finding that an offence under section 193 read with section 191 or section 209 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 has been committed by the respondents and for making a complaint in writing through competent officer of this … enquiry is cited with approval in paragraph-11 thereof. In MannalaSardarmal Jain v. Kishan Jodhraj Maharaj, AIR 1959 MP 264, standard of proof required in cases of perjury is looked into. In AIR 1957 AP 832 (In Re:

Vinod Kumar Sachdeva & Ors vs.ashok Sachdeva & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

of a Fair Price Shop for the offence of criminal breach of trust under section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, interpreted the agreement entered into between the Governor of State of West Bengal and the said retailer and … + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2018. CS(COMM) 264/2016 & IA No.7220/2016 (u/O I R-10(2) CPC) L.T. OVERSEAS, NORTH AMERICA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.Sai Deepak, Mr.

l.t. Overseas, North America vs.sachdeva and Sons Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

of a Fair Price Shop for the offence of criminal breach of trust under section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, interpreted the agreement entered into between the Governor of State of West Bengal and the said retailer and … + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2018. CS(COMM) 264/2016 & IA No.7220/2016 (u/O I R-10(2) CPC) L.T. OVERSEAS, NORTH AMERICA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.Sai Deepak, Mr.

Nanalal Harishanker Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 65, 71, 279, 337 and 338; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 260, 261, 261A, 261(1), 262, 262(2), 263, 264, 362 and 370; ;Ahmedabad City Courts Act, 1961 - Sections 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882

Reported in : AIR1969Guj62; 1969CriLJ389

has also observed as under:--'Where the accused is prosecuted for the offences under Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the compounding of the offences under Section 337 of the Code will not prevent the prosecution from being … of the evidence and also the particulars mentioned in Section 263. That appears to be the position from Section 264 of the Criminal Procedure Code and that is what is found in the record of the present case.

Mookkiah and anr. Vs. State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Tamil Na ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 34; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2013SCW339; AIR2013SC321; 2013(2)SCC89; 2013(1)MLJ(Cri)361

against both the accused persons which was registered as Crime No. 173 of 1992 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’).(e) After investigation, both the accused persons were arrested and charges were framed against them under … acquittal of appellants herein dated 24.08.1998 passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Court, Tirunelveli in Sessions Case No. 264 of 1996. 2) The facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are as under:(a) Uluppadi Parai is

Swam Mills Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 89; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11AA; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 142; Income Tax Act - Sections 246, 245D(4), 260A and 264; Wealth Tax Act - Sections 22D(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; ;Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 8, 9, 9(2), 9(3) 12A and 12A(6); ;Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transaction in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3(2); ;Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 - Sections 87, 90, 92 and 95; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

any person in respect of whom prosecution for any offence punishable under Chapter IX or Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, (46 of 1973), the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, … have to examine Section 95(i)(c) of the Scheme, which was different from appeals under Section 246, revisions under Section 264, appeals under Section 260A etc. of the I.T. Act and similar provisions under the W.T. Act. Under the

Mookkiah and anr. Vs. State Tr.insp. of Police, Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

complaint against both the accused persons which was registered as Crime No.173 of 1992 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’). (e) After investigation, both the accused persons were arrested and charges were framed against them

Harish Kumar & Ors. vs the State (Nct of Delhi) Through S.H.O P.S. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No. 264/2022 dated 09.02.2022 registered at PS.: Ranhola under Sections 498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Deed dated 09.10.2025 [Annexure P/6] arrived at … Vijay Vihar SI- Udit, PS: RanholaCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 20.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No. 264/2022 dated