Advanced Search Results

Haranahalli Ramaswamy Vs. K. Shama Rao (Dead) and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 256, 317, 317(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 500, 501 and 502

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ362

came to be registered against the petitioner-accused for the offences punishable under Sections 500, 501 and 502 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. During the pendency of the proceedings in the said case before the Trial Court, the first respondent i.e., … Court to pass order on the application of the 2nd respondent herein filed in the said case under Section 256 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner has further sought for exemption from his personal attendance before the Trial Court

Mannath Balchandran Vs. Forbes Forbes Campbell and Co. Ltd., Bombay an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : India Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 408, 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 256, 302 and 397

Reported in : 1996CriLJ2131; 1996(2)MhLj932

of the copy of this order. 16. Order accordingly. (i) Criminal - entrusting prosecution - Section 408 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 630 of Companies Act, 1956 and Sections 256, 302 and 397 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - revision

Sidheswar Ganguly Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 256(2) and 342; Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : AIR1958SC143; 1958CriLJ273; [1958]1SCR749

in the appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. 18. Appeal dismissed. Criminal - medical evidence - Section 376 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 256 (2) and 342 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Article 134 (1) of Constitution of India

Sanjay Jaywant Gaikwad and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

punishable under Section 120B of I.P.C. r/w. Secs.255, 256, 258, 259, 263, 420 r/w. Sec. 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and within my cognizance. Secondly, that you above named accused, along with other unknown associates, in the month

Ganesh Narayan Hegde Vs. S. Bangarappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 499 and 500; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22); Karnataka General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 3(15); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 256(2) and 342

Reported in : ILR1999KAR3480; 2000(4)KarLJ133

upon the same decision in the case of Harbhajan Singh's case, supra, wherein it is stated as follows.-'(a) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 499, Exception 9 and Section 52 -- Good faith -- Proof of -- It is question of fact … prescribed by the General Clauses Act is not introduced. (f) Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Section 342 and Section 256(2) -- Filing of written statement by accused person need not always to be deprecated. The view that the

J. Muthukrishnan and anr., Etc. Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2), 190, 197, 197(1), 227, 306(4)(1), 306(5), 403(I) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120B, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165A, 166, 167, 168, 169, 182, 193, 197, 198, 201, 204, 211, 218, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 263A, 379, 380, 381, 382, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 465, 466, 467 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2), 6 and 6(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5, 5(1) and 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2570

420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860). (These offences are not applicable to the State of Jammu and Kashmir). 2. Offences punishable … ORDER1. All these applications had been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 13 of 1988 (Popularly known … 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 263A, 379, 380, 381, 382,

Ranjit Sarkar versus Ravi Ganesh Bhardwaj and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1448

under Section 204(1), Cr. PC against, inter alia, the respondents for alleged commission of offence under Section 304A, Indian Penal Code, 1860. 5. The respondents were arrayed as some of the accused in the complaint. Upon service of summons on … appointed for the appearance of the accused”. [Para 19]List of Acts Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.List of Keywords Section 256 of Cr.PC; Appearance of accused; Acquittal of accused; Absence of complainant; Day appointed for appearance; Non-appearance of complainant;

Habeeb Mohammad Vs. the State of Hyderabad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 302, 307, 342 and 436; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162, 172, 197, 216, 256, 257, 312 and 331; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 4, 53, 110, 114 and 145; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1954SC51; [1954]1SCR475; 1954 Cri LJ 338

respondent : G. H. Rajadhyaksha. Criminal - material witness - Sections 148, 302, 307, 342 and 436 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 , Sections 162, 172, 197, 216, 256, 257, 312 and 331 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 3, … upon the learned Advocate-General in reply. It was contended that the court did not examine the accused under section 256, Criminal Procedure Code, after further cross-examination of the witnesses. In our opinion, this omission was not material as

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. the Committee for Protection of Demo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 1(1), 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1) and 6; ;Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; ;Explosives Act, 1884 - Section 9B; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 201, 302, 364, 436 and 448; ;Constitution of India - Articles 1, 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 31C, 32, 142, 144, 226, 226(1), 245 to 255 and 256 to 261

Reported in : 2010(2)KCCR785,RLW2010(1)SC822,2010(2)SCALE467,2010(2)LC1047(SC):(2010)3SCC571

January, 2001 itself but the First Information Report ('the FIR' for short) for offences under Sections 148/149/448/436/364/302/201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC') read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 9(B) of the … to 255 deal with distribution of legislative powers, the distribution of administrative powers is dealt with in Articles 256 to 261. Under the Constitution, there is a three-fold distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the

Santosh Giri vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

to as the 'Cr.P.C.') the petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No.787/2014 under Sections 376/323/506/34/354/354A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 … $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 256/2017 Order reserved on :15. h September, 2017 Order pronounced on :24. h October, 2017 SANTOSH GIRI .….Petitioner Through: