Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 241 · Page 1 of about 179 results (0.053 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 28 1961

Mohanlal Nandlal Sharma and anr. Vs. State

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-28-1961

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 241, 251 and 262; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 504 and 506(2)

Reported in : AIR1962Guj231; (1962)3GLR433

- conviction - Sections 241, 251, 262 and 537 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 323 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellants-accused convicted for offence committed under Section 323 - revision application against such Order - offence under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1983

Roshan Beevi and ors. Vs. Joint Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-09-1983

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 20(3), 21, 22, 22(2) and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 99, 193, 225, 228, 241, 339 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 36(1), 43, 45, 45(1), 46, 160(1), 164, 167(1), 438 and 439; Evidence Act - Sections 24, 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : 1984(15)ELT289(Mad)

22 (2) and 226 of Constitution of India, Sections 99, 193, 225, 228, 241, 339 and 342 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 2, 36 (1), 43, 45, 45 (1), 46, 160 (1), 438 and 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, … it would be similar to an offence of wrongful restraint as defined in Section 339, I.P.C., punishable under Section 241, I.P.C. or an offence of wrongful confinement as defined in Section 340 punishable under Section 342, I.P.C. This

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1989

J. Muthukrishnan and anr., Etc. Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-14-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2), 190, 197, 197(1), 227, 306(4)(1), 306(5), 403(I) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120B, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165A, 166, 167, 168, 169, 182, 193, 197, 198, 201, 204, 211, 218, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 263A, 379, 380, 381, 382, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 465, 466, 467 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2), 6 and 6(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5, 5(1) and 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2570

420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860). (These offences are not applicable to the State of Jammu and Kashmir). 2. Offences punishable … ORDER1. All these applications had been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 13 of 1988 (Popularly known … 211, 218, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 08 1996

State of Karnataka Vs. Benoy Thomas

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-08-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 229, 241, 279, 304A, 337, 368, 399 and 401; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 252

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT(Cri)792; 1997CriLJ1225; ILR1997KAR186

of Rs. 1,000/- even though the offence of which he was convicted was one under S. 304-A of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court, in appeal by the State, acting upon the plea of guilty, maintained the sentence of … 21. Proper course in such instances is to order retrial giving opportunity to the accused to defend himself. Penal Code, 1860, Sec. 304-A - Constitution of India, Art. 21. (1) We are of the view that this is a … Supreme Court has held as follows :- 'Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 229, 241 and 368, 399 and 401 - Plea-bargaining - Enhancement or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2025

Jaideep Bose versus M/S Bid and Hammer Auctioneers Private Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-18-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]3S.C.R.234

the selection of content that is subsequently published, making him accountable for the same unless proven otherwise. (b) Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 499 Defamation. Whoever, by words either spoken or intended [2025] 3 S.C.R. 247 Jaideep Bose v. M/s Bid … [2025] 3 S.C.R. 234 : 2025 INSC 241 Jaideep Bose v. M/s Bid and Hammer Auctioneers Private Limited (Criminal Appeal No. 814 of 2025) 18 February

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 2011

Surinder Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-21-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307

Reported in : 2011(10)SCC173; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)230; 2012(1)MLJ(Crl)356; AIR2012SCW494; 2012(1)MWN(Cri)184; 2012CriLJ1043

Judge, Ambala allowed the appeal filed by the State and convicted the appellant herein under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of … order dated 19.12.2003 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 241-DBA of 1993 whereby the High Court while reversing the judgment dated 17.12.1992 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ambala

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2019

Rohtas Vs. The State of Haryana State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-2019

Subject : Criminal

to the appellants Rohtas (Accused No.1) and Surender Singh (Accused No.2) for offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Trial Court came to be confirmed.2. Initially, six accused were tried for the offence registered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2017

Chaman Rani & Ors. Vs.state of West Bengal& Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2017

Subject : Criminal

instance of the third respondent in these proceedings alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), apparently on the basis of a complaint lodged under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, … COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. th April, 2017 Pronounced on:17. th April, 2017 + WP(CRL.) 241/2010 & Crl. M.A. 2023/2010 & 10053/2011 CHAMAN RANI & ORS. .... PETITIONERS Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2025

Firoz Khan Akbarkhan versus the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-24-2025

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2025]3S.C.R.933

Section 376-AB, Section 376-B, Section 376-C, Section 376-D, Section 376-DA, Section 376-DB, Section 376-E or Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is alleged to have been committed or attempted shall be recorded, by a woman police … of Acts Penal Code, 1860; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.List of Keywords Murder; Knife; Common intention; Section 302, Penal Code, 1860; Section 34, Penal Code, 1860; Eyewitness testimony; Delay in recording statements under Sections 161, 164 of Code of Criminal … (2) SCR 875] , Appabhai v. State of Gujarat [1988 Supp SCC 241 : 1988 SCC (Cri) 559 : JT (1988) 1 SC 249] and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2013

Puran @ Shankar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2013

Subject : Criminal

judgment dated 3rd April, 2012 by which the appellants have been convicted under Sections 343, 364A, 365 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC, for short). The appellants have also been convicted under Section 120B IPC. By order of sentence dated … DHARMU ....Appellant Through Ms. Prerna, Advocate. Versus STATE Through + Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP Crl. Appeal No. 241/2013 SATYAWAN KATHERIA AND ORS. ....Appellant Through Mr. Ravish Roshan, Mr. Manoj Bansal and Mr. Yunush Advocates. Versus STATE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial