Advanced Search Results

Thippeswamy @ Thippeshi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

addressed the scope of Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, which is held thus: “ Penal Code, 1860: s.302 r/w 34 - Allegation that on account of previous dispute between the parties, accused wit the intention … and 3 were the ones who had doused kerosene and set her ablaze.17. As per Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, there can be no dispute that dying declaration can be the - 21 - NC:2023. … responsible official witnesses said to have recorded the dying declaration of - 24 - NC:2023. KHC:22095-DB CRL.A No.829 of 2017 deceased Manjamma, the Trial Court

Karan vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

No. 80/2021.2. By the impugned judgment, the learned ASJ convicted theappellant for the offences under Sections 342/363/365/376AB/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (‘POCSO Act’). By the … (hereafter ‘impugned judgment’) and orderof sentencing dated 30.07.2025 (hereafter ‘impugned order on KAUR CRL.A. 1270/2025 Page 1 of 24 sentence’) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO)- 6, West District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (‘ASJ’) in

State By Anavatti Police Station Vs. Vasantha @ Vasanthakumar M.p.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

same has not been proved beyond reasonable doubt. Even the Court having presumptive value under Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Merely because Accused No.1 / Vasantha @ Vasanthakumar M.P. and deceased Smt. Sridevi had taken … R-1 stands abated) This Criminal Appeal filed under Sec.372 of Criminal Procedure Code, by the Advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment … under Sections 498A, 304B, 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, 1860 besides Sections 3 and 4 of the DP Act, 1961.2. The appeal … at Shivamogga and convict the respondent for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 302 r/w Sec.34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and allow the appeal by convicting the respondents. … for R-4; Vide court order dated 06.01.2022 and 24.01.2022 appeal against R-1 stands abated) This Criminal Appeal

Chandraiahgari Ananthareddi and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 300 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 30

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT(Cri)489; 1996CriLJ2109

other case. 23. Appeal allowed. Criminal - benefit of doubt - Sections 34, 201, 300 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 3, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 30 of Indian Evidence

Anter Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302 ; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 24, 25, 25(1), 26 and 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1380; 2004(1)CTC612; 2004(1)JKJ21[SC]; JT2004(2)SC332; 2004(2)SCALE271; (2004)10SCC657; 2004(2)LC769(SC); 2004 Cri LJ 138; MANU/SC/0096/2004

accused-appellant was charged for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 302, 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC') and Section 25(1)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short 'the Arms … and 26. It is not necessary in this case to consider if this Section qualifies, to any extent. Section 24, also. It will be seen that the first condition necessary for bringing this Section into operation is the

Rupesh Manger (thapa) Vs. The State Of Sikkim

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

of the Trial Court dated 30.10.2018 and convicted the appellant-accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( for short ‘IPC’) and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for life. 22. The prosecution case, in … would call in question the legality and validity of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24.08.2022 and 05.09.2022 passed by the High Court of Sikkim at Gangtok in Criminal Appeal No.08 of 2020 whereby

Mahendra Mishra and Others Vs. State of Karnataka By The Assistant Com ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

, for brevity) and for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 114 and 419 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Hereinafter referred to as the IPC , for brevity). 2. The petitioners herein had filed an application seeking … this is an elementary aspect on which there can be no two opinions. He also draws attention to Section 24 of the PC Act, which lays downs that a statement by a bribe giver to the effect that

Mohd. Azad @ SamIn Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 164(2) and 313

Reported in : AIR2009SC1307; RLW2009(2)SC1815; 2008(6)LHSC4224; 2009AIRSCW752

appellants. Both the appellants were convicted for offence punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( in short the `IPC'). Three persons were accused of the alleged offences. One of them, i.e. Md. … confession was voluntary would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case, judged in the light of Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short `Evidence Act'). The law is clear that a confession cannot

Prakash Gupta vs.state of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

„Cr.PC‟) praying for grant him anticipatory bail in a case registered vide FIR No.62/2017, under Section 409 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short „IPC‟) with Police Station Vasant Kunj (South), New Delhi.2. This bail application was considered by the … a common order.8. Mr. Gupta submitted that in the bail application before the learned ASJ, a reply dated 24.01.2017 was filed by the Investigating Officer (in short „IO‟) in which it was stated that the complainant delivered

Manjula and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

accused No.1 to 3 for the offence punishable under Sections 504 and 326 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 where Accused Nos.1 to 3 were to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under … under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set-aside the conviction and sentence dated 24.09.2009 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Shimoga in S.C.No. 161/2008, convicting the appellants / accused No.1 to 3