Advanced Search Results
Daroga Singh and ors. Vs. B.K. Pandey
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2004
Criminal
Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2, 2(3), 9, 10, 14 and 15(2); Commission of Inquiries Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Evidence Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 228, 302, 201/34 and 499; Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 235; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 349
2004(52)BLJR1162; 2004CriLJ2084; JT2004(1)SC608; 2004(4)SCALE554; (2004)5SCC26
request. Criminal - Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Section 2, 2(3), 9, 10, 14 and 15(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 228 - Power and jurisdiction of High Court to punish contempts of subordinate Courts - Non
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Revashankar
Supreme Court of India
Sep-24-1958
Media and CommunicationCriminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 228, 497, 499 and 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 480
AIR1959SC102; 1959CriLJ251; (1959)61PLR343; [1959]1SCR1367
possible. 16. Appeal allowed. The contempt of Court and the test of ouster of High Court's jurisdiction - Indian Penal Code 1860 - S.228 - Contempt of Court Act 1952 - S 3(2). - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1890.Section 375 &
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHigh Court of Karnataka, Bangalore, Represented by Its Registrar Gener ...
Karnataka
Dec-16-2011
Criminal
Constitution Of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 15, 10; Karnataka (Contempt of Court Proceedings) Rules, 1981 - Rule 8(ii)(b); Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Section 228; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 345
2012(2)KarLJ55; 2012(2)KantLJ55; 2012CriLJ312
been committed in respect of a court subordinate to it where such contempt is an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).It was in the wake of such statutory provision, this court had directed the Registrar General … having regard to the provisions of proviso to section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and section 228 of the Indian Penal Code.Registry to ensure that complete set of papers are made available to the learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Praveen Pradhan. Vs. State of Uttranchal and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-04-2012
Criminal
Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 482, 161, 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306, 420, 107
conclusion of the investigation, the police filed charge-sheet No.208/2005 on 5.11.2005 against the appellant under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’). E. Aggrieved, the appellant filed a Criminal Misc. Application No. 420 of … court cannot form a firm opinion, rather a tentative view that would evoke the presumption referred to under Section 228 Cr.P.C.16. Thus, the case is required to be considered in the light of aforesaid settled legal propositions. In
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiyaka Marong Abdoulaya Vs. Mr. J.L. Pandey, Inspector of Customs (P) ...
Mumbai
Jan-28-2003
Narcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 29 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108 and 135; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 132; Evidence Act - Sections 32
2003(2)ALD(Cri)108; 2003BomCR(Cri)1826
failure to do so would invite a prosecution for offences indicated by Sections 193 and Section 228 of Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). They are entitled to get the benefit of exemption under Section 132 of the Code
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShahid Khan Vs. Director of Revenue Intelligence
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-26-2001
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 22, 23, 25, 27A, 28, 29, 42, 42(1), 42(2) and 67; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 132; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 139 and 228
2001(1)ALD(Cri)781; 2001CriLJ3183
shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of section 193 and section 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.' 57. The wording used in Section 67 of NDPS Act is quite different from the wording used in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYogesh @ SachIn Jagdish Joshi Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Apr-28-2008
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 3 and 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 209, 227 and 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120A, 120B, 302 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227
AIR2008SC2991; 2008CriLJ3872; JT2008(6)SC299; 2008(6)SCALE469; (2008)10SCC394; 2008AIRSCW5043; 2008(3)LH(SC)2230; 2008(3)AICLR256; [2008] 6 SCR 1116; 2008 INSC 534
A-2, A-4 to A-7, A-11 and A-12 have been prosecuted for offences under Section 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the I.P.C.'), whereas accused A-7 to A-10 and A-13 to A-16 have been prosecuted for offences … a discharge of an accused at a stage anterior in point of time to framing of charge under Section 228. It provides that upon consideration of the record of the case, the documents submitted with the police report
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdvocate General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. Abbaraju Ramarao
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-30-1966
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 3(2), 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Article 215; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 476-A and 562(1-A); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 217, 218, 219, 228 and 471
AIR1968AP207; 1968CriLJ888
the jurisdiction of the High Court was ousted inasmuch as the act complained of constituted an offence under Section 228 of the Indian Penal Code. The correctness of that finding was challenged before then Lordships in appeal. Their … v. State of Madras, : 1952CriLJ832 the Supreme Court observed thus: (at page 152):--'What is made punishable in the Indian Penal Code is the offence of defamation as defamation and not as contempt of Court. If the defamation of a … contempt is an offence punishable under Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860).'In the present case also, the passages complained of in each of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Punjab Vs. Barkat Ram
Supreme Court of India
Aug-30-1961
Civil
Land Customs Act, 1924 - Sections 9(1); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167 to 193; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23(1); Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Police Act, 1861; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1861 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898
AIR1962SC276; 1985(5)LC2194(SC); [1962]3SCR338
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955, Police Act, 1861, Sections 193 and 228 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 5 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1861 and Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 - conviction Order set
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLiberty Footwear Company Vs. Force Footwear Company and ors.
Delhi
Sep-18-2009
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 83, 91(1), 92, 92(2), 92(3), 93, 100, 220(6), 254 and 255(5); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 149; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 196 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 7; Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003 - Rule 14 and 14(1)
2009(41)PTC474(Del)
proceedings before IPAB are judicial proceedings under Sections 193, 228 and for the purpose of Section 196 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.5. It is well settled that quasi judicial tribunals
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »