Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 228 · Page 1 of about 947 results (0.072 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 13 2004

Daroga Singh and ors. Vs. B.K. Pandey

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2, 2(3), 9, 10, 14 and 15(2); Commission of Inquiries Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Evidence Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 228, 302, 201/34 and 499; Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 235; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 349

Reported in : 2004(52)BLJR1162; 2004CriLJ2084; JT2004(1)SC608; 2004(4)SCALE554; (2004)5SCC26

request. Criminal - Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Section 2, 2(3), 9, 10, 14 and 15(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 228 - Power and jurisdiction of High Court to punish contempts of subordinate Courts - Non

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1958

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Revashankar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-24-1958

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 228, 497, 499 and 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 480

Reported in : AIR1959SC102; 1959CriLJ251; (1959)61PLR343; [1959]1SCR1367

possible. 16. Appeal allowed. The contempt of Court and the test of ouster of High Court's jurisdiction - Indian Penal Code 1860 - S.228 - Contempt of Court Act 1952 - S 3(2). - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1890.Section 375 &

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2011

High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore, Represented by Its Registrar Gener ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-16-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 15, 10; Karnataka (Contempt of Court Proceedings) Rules, 1981 - Rule 8(ii)(b); Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Section 228; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 345

Reported in : 2012(2)KarLJ55; 2012(2)KantLJ55; 2012CriLJ312

been committed in respect of a court subordinate to it where such contempt is an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).It was in the wake of such statutory provision, this court had directed the Registrar General … having regard to the provisions of proviso to section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and section 228 of the Indian Penal Code.Registry to ensure that complete set of papers are made available to the learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 04 2012

Praveen Pradhan. Vs. State of Uttranchal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 482, 161, 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306, 420, 107

conclusion of the investigation, the police filed charge-sheet No.208/2005 on 5.11.2005 against the appellant under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’). E. Aggrieved, the appellant filed a Criminal Misc. Application No. 420 of … court cannot form a firm opinion, rather a tentative view that would evoke the presumption referred to under Section 228 Cr.P.C.16. Thus, the case is required to be considered in the light of aforesaid settled legal propositions. In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2003

Siyaka Marong Abdoulaya Vs. Mr. J.L. Pandey, Inspector of Customs (P) ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-28-2003

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 29 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108 and 135; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 132; Evidence Act - Sections 32

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)108; 2003BomCR(Cri)1826

failure to do so would invite a prosecution for offences indicated by Sections 193 and Section 228 of Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). They are entitled to get the benefit of exemption under Section 132 of the Code

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2001

Shahid Khan Vs. Director of Revenue Intelligence

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-2001

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 22, 23, 25, 27A, 28, 29, 42, 42(1), 42(2) and 67; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 132; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 139 and 228

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)781; 2001CriLJ3183

shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of section 193 and section 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.' 57. The wording used in Section 67 of NDPS Act is quite different from the wording used in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2008

Yogesh @ SachIn Jagdish Joshi Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 3 and 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 209, 227 and 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120A, 120B, 302 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2008SC2991; 2008CriLJ3872; JT2008(6)SC299; 2008(6)SCALE469; (2008)10SCC394; 2008AIRSCW5043; 2008(3)LH(SC)2230; 2008(3)AICLR256; [2008] 6 SCR 1116; 2008 INSC 534

A-2, A-4 to A-7, A-11 and A-12 have been prosecuted for offences under Section 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the I.P.C.'), whereas accused A-7 to A-10 and A-13 to A-16 have been prosecuted for offences … a discharge of an accused at a stage anterior in point of time to framing of charge under Section 228. It provides that upon consideration of the record of the case, the documents submitted with the police report

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 30 1966

Advocate General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. Abbaraju Ramarao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-30-1966

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 3(2), 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Article 215; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 476-A and 562(1-A); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 217, 218, 219, 228 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968AP207; 1968CriLJ888

the jurisdiction of the High Court was ousted inasmuch as the act complained of constituted an offence under Section 228 of the Indian Penal Code. The correctness of that finding was challenged before then Lordships in appeal. Their … v. State of Madras, : 1952CriLJ832 the Supreme Court observed thus: (at page 152):--'What is made punishable in the Indian Penal Code is the offence of defamation as defamation and not as contempt of Court. If the defamation of a … contempt is an offence punishable under Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860).'In the present case also, the passages complained of in each of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1961

The State of Punjab Vs. Barkat Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-30-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Customs Act, 1924 - Sections 9(1); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167 to 193; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23(1); Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Police Act, 1861; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1861 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898

Reported in : AIR1962SC276; 1985(5)LC2194(SC); [1962]3SCR338

Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955, Police Act, 1861, Sections 193 and 228 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 5 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1861 and Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 - conviction Order set

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2009

Liberty Footwear Company Vs. Force Footwear Company and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 83, 91(1), 92, 92(2), 92(3), 93, 100, 220(6), 254 and 255(5); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 149; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 196 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 7; Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003 - Rule 14 and 14(1)

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC474(Del)

proceedings before IPAB are judicial proceedings under Sections 193, 228 and for the purpose of Section 196 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.5. It is well settled that quasi judicial tribunals

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial