Advanced Search Results

State of Kerala Vs. Devassy

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 24, 24(2), 40 and 40(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 225B

Reported in : AIR1962Ker258; 1964CriLJ101

Section 35 and Order 21 Rules 24, 40 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 225B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal by State against Order of Magistrate acquitting accused charged under Section 225B - original petition filed

Public Prosecutor Vs. Annadham Annamalai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1947 - Sections 2(6) and 2(7); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 42 and 225B; Invocation of Police Act, 1861 - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR1954Mad321

and 2 (7) of Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1947 and Sections 40, 42 and 225B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - acquittal from charges of offences of preventing police from executing arrest warrant challenged - arrest warrant issued … Penal Code, and a rescue by others and the escape by the detainee will attract the application of Section 225B, I. P. C. provided the detention was lawful.12. Was the detention in this case lawful is the further

Thangal Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 24(2), 37, 37(1) and 38; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109 and 225B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 236 and 237

Reported in : AIR1961Ker331

(2), 37, 37 (1) and 38 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sections 225 B and 109 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 236 and 237 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 - revision petition against confirming Order of conviction … and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 4 months under Section 353 and rigorous imprisonment for 2 months under Section 225B. On appeal the District Magistrate of palghat set aside the conviction Under Section 353 I.P.C., but confirmed the

Kunhambu Nambiar Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 225B - Order 21, Rule 24(2)

Reported in : AIR1957Ker174; 1957CriLJ1264

at Cannanore, the sustainability of the conviction entered against him by the sub Magistrate under Section 225B of the Indian Penal Code and which was confirmed by the District Magistrate of Malabar, has been challenged by him. The prosecution case

A.K. Narayanan Nambiar Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rules 22(2) and 37; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 225B and 353

Reported in : AIR1964Ker158; 1964CriLJ668

21 Rules 22 (2) and 37 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Sections 225B and 353 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Order of arrest and arrest by process server challenged - challenge on grounds that apprehension of accused … P. C. The learned Magistrate acquitted the accused of the offence under Section 353, but convicted him under Section 225B and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 100/-. 2. The facts that led up to the

Sk. Didar Khan and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 225B and 323; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 235

Reported in : AIR1965Cal368,1965CriLJ89

directed against an appellate Order dismissing the petitioners' appeal against their conviction and sentence under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The prosecution case was as follows :On March 28, 1961 at about 6-45 P.M. Sk.Sorab and Sk. Nuru

In Re: Mammed Beary

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 225B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 24(2)

Reported in : AIR1955Mad157; 1955CriLJ569

The petitioner in this case has been convicted by the first Class Magistrate, Kasargod for an offence under Section 225-B, I. P. C., andsentenced to three months rigorous imprisonment.In appeal the conviction and sentence were confirmed by

Vishnu vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

of 2023 of Kayamkulam Police Station, Alappuzha District, alleging offences punishable under Sections 225B, 332 and 333 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.3. According to the prosecution, on 01.04.2023, thepetitioner, who was already an accused in Crime No.1057 of 2020 … 2BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.B.A.No.4317 of 2023 Dated this the 15th day of June, 2023ORDERThis application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail.2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.289

Emperor Vs. Muli

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1921)ILR43All185

reduced to one of rigorous imprisonment for six months. Act No. XLV 1860 (Indian Penal Code), Section 225B - Escave from jail of a person … on the part of the Legislature, and led, amongst other changes in the law, to the enactment of Section 225B of the Indian Penal Code. The conviction in this case should undoubtedly have been recorded under that section … Piggott, J.1. Muli has been couvioted, on a charge under Section 224 of the Indian Penal Code, of having escaped from a jail in which he was confined under a warrant under Section 123 of

Khuda Bux and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 35, 100, 439 and 552; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96, 99, 147, 225B, 332, 342 and 379

Reported in : AIR1951All637

sentences concurrent without exercising any discretion in the matter. It is laid down in section 35 of the Code that one sentence of imprisonment will commence after the expiration of the other sentence of imprisonment unless the … in the matter. It is laid down in section 35 of the Code that one sentence of imprisonment will commence after the expiration of the … 552, the appcts. would have been guilty Under sections 147 & 828, I. P. C., though not Under section 225B. Mr. Saxena referred to Jagannath v. Emperor : AIR1932All227 : Bisu Halder v. Emperor, 6 Cr L. J.