Advanced Search Results

Shalik Maruti Kowe (In Jail) Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its Sec ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. Constitution of India - Article 14 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Prisons Act, 1894 - Section 45, Section 52 - Maharashtra Prisons (Punishment) Rules, 1963 … Inspector, Open Prison, Morshi, a crime came to be registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 224 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner had along with his relatives surrendered to the Police Station Pandharkavada

Hamjisab Mehamadsab Shahapur and ors. Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mysore Prohibition Act - Sections 76(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 224 and 225

Reported in : AIR1966Mys20; 1966CriLJ36; (1965)1MysLJ307

(15) I dismiss this revision petition. (16) Petition dismissed. Criminal - custody - Sections 224 and 225 of Indian penal Code, 1860 - whether accused no. 1 guilty under Section 224 and accused nos. 2 to 4 guilty under Section

In Re: Kulandaivelu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 224

Reported in : AIR1969Mad408; 1969CriLJ1406; (1969)1MLJ92

revision petition is dismissed, with the above modification in the sentence. Criminal - conviction - Section 224 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petitioner convicted under Section 224 - findings confirmed by Appellate Court - petitioner challenged findings of Appellate

Syed Aref S/O Syed Omer Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 224; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 46

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR630

Fine, if paid, be refunded. Rule is made absolute accordingly. Criminal - lawful custody - Section 224 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 46 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - conviction sought on allegation that petitioner escaped from lawful

Jamil Ahmed Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 224, 307 and 332

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3663

duly authenticated by the Sheristedar of this Court. Criminal - conviction - Sections 224, 307 and 332 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal against Order of conviction passed by Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) - ASJ appreciated evidence on record … fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 224 of Indian Penal Code. He has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay

D. Bhuvan Mohan Patnaik and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 46(2), 46(3) and 66; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 224

Reported in : AIR1974SC2092; 1975CriLJ556; (1975)3SCC185; [1975]2SCR24; MANU/SC/0038/1974

Frankfurter J. in Wolf v. Colorado (1949) 338 U.S. 25'. Constitution - political beliefs - Section 224 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petitioners who were 'naxalites' asked for reliefs that armed guards posted around jail should be removed and

Tulshi Rabidas Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 224 and 225; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 169

Reported in : AIR1975SC638; 1975CriLJ598; (1975)3SCC845; [1975]3SCR401

dismissed and the rule discharged. Criminal - detention - Preventive Detention Act and Sections 224 and 225 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 169 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petitioner detained with view to inhibit his activities prejudicial

Nagalingam and Etc. Etc. Vs. the State, by the Inspector of Police, Cr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 224, 376, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 474, 489A, B and D and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 433

Reported in : 1996CriLJ3338

All the Criminal Revision Cases shall stand dismissed.13. Revision dismissed. Criminal - remission -Sections 224 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 433 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petitioner pleaded for revision application of certain Government Orders

Kershi Pirozsha Bhagvagar Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 22A and 22B; Arms Act; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 87; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 4, 4(2), 5(2), 200, 397 and 452; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 379, 380, 409 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 218 to 224 and 233 to 240

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3958; (2007)3GLR2508

other laws' (1) All offences under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) shall be investigated, inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with according to … correct to contend that the provisions of Section 219 are applicable only to offences defined and punishable under the Indian Penal Code. Ms. Kruti M. Shah has submitted that there is no such bar, either implied or explicit, either in … this question, the provisions of Section 219 of the Code will have to be scrutinized. Section 218 to Section 224 occur in Chapter XVII-B titled as 'Joinder of Charges'. All sections deal with the same subject but contemplate

Queen-empress Vs. Kandhaia and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All67

offence punishable under Section 224, and you Paltu, Mohan, and Sewak, an offence punishable under Section 225 of the Indian Penal Code, and these offences are triable by my Court, and I hereby, &c.;6. The witnesses named by the accused … Indian Penal Code; otherwise they cannot be so charged ; and as, under Section 40, Act XLV of 1860, the charge under Section 55, Act X of 1882, does not come within the definition of an offence,