Advanced Search Results
Tarkeshwar Sahu Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Supreme Court of India
Sep-29-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304B, 306, 325, 335, 354, 363, 366, 375, 376, 406, 407, 498A, 509 and 511; Evidence Act - Sections 113A; Sexual Offences Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 222
[2007(1)JCR342(SC)]; JT2006(12)SC559; 2006(10)SCALE45; (2006)8SCC560
partly allowed and disposed of accordingly. Criminal - Abducting Woman - Sections 354, 366, 376 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - When prosecutrix came out of home to attend call of nature, appellant abducted her and taken her … to forcibly outraging the modesty of a girl. In a situation like this, we would like to invoke Section 222 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides that in a case where the accused is charged with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandharinath Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Jul-06-2009
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376 to 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 222
2009(57)BLJR2916; JT2009(8)SC688; RLW2009(2)SC2290; 2009(9)SCALE62; 2009(7)LC3407(SC)
Bench of the High Court of Bombay, convicting the appellant herein under the provisions of Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short `IPC'). The trial court, after convicting the appellant under Section 376 IPC sentenced him to suffer … It is true that there was no charge under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC. However, under Section 222 of the CrPC when a person is charged for an offence he may be convicted of an attempt
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirendra Kumar Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-16-2007
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 to 306; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 161, 222, 222(1), 222(2), 313 and 464
2007(2)SCALE103; (2007)9SCC211; 2007AIRSCW854; 2007CriLJ1435; (2007)3SCC(Cri)120; (2007)1Crimes370(SC); JT2007(2)SC452; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)377;
filed by the appellant in part by setting aside his conviction for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and instead convicting him for offence punishable under Section 306 IPC. He was sentenced … as to the effect of no charge having been framed under Section 306 is concerned the effect of Section 222(2) and Section 464 of Cr. P.C. cannot be lost sight of. In Dalbir Singh's case (supra) it was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dinesh Seth Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Aug-18-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 304B, 304B(1), 306, 325, 335, 406, 407 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 215, 221, 221(1), 221(2), 222, 222(1), 222(2), 222(3), 313, 464, 464(1), 464(2) and 465; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 225, 232, 535 and 537; Evidence Act - Sections 113A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2
2008(56)BLJR2791; 2008CriLJ4345; 153(2008)DLT535(SC); JT2008(9)SC67; 2008(11)SCALE470
- Conviction - Dowry Death or Cruelty - Effect of omission to frame - Section 304B, 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 221, 222 and 464 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Trial Court convicted all
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSannaia Subba Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-24-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366A, 368, 372 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 222 and 378
2008(56)BLJR2583; RLW2008(3)SC2689; 2008(10)SCALE401; 2008AIRSCW6014; 2008(3)Crimes174; 2008(4)LH(SC)2955
the High Court - Legality of - Appellate Powers - Discussion - Sections 363, 366A, 372, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the Act) - Family of the prosecutrix, a minor, filed a missing report casting doubts on the Appellants … punishment of ten years whereas Section 363 IPC envisages a punishment of seven years.52. Under the provisions of Section 222 of the Code a provision is made that in a case where the accused is charged with a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishor S/O Raghunath Shrirama Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Sep-13-1994
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 222, 222(3) and 313
1995CriLJ1765
out the remaining sentence. Order accordingly. 17. Order accordingly. Criminal - attempt - Sections 376 and 511 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 222, 222 (3) and 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - accused charged under Section 376
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChittaranjan Das Vs. State of West Bengal
Supreme Court of India
Apr-22-1963
Criminal
Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 222(1) and 421; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145
AIR1963SC1696; [1964]3SCR237
previous statements of the prosecutrix could be treated as substantive evidence and whether the verdict was perverse under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The Court ruled that where it is possible to specify the necessary particulars required by Section 222(1)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanchhodlal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-1964
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409, 467, 471 and 477(A); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 - Sections 222, 233, 234, 235 and 397(1)
AIR1965SC1248; [1965]2SCR283
appeals. 23. Appeals dismissed. Criminal - breach of trust - Sections 409, 467, 471 and 477 (A) of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 222, 233, 234, 235 and 397 (1) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 - appellant got 4 … been charged for committingcriminal breach of trust with respect to the total amount he hadmisappropriated, in view of section 222 Cr.P.C. and that if he had been socharge, the charge for misappropriating the total amount would have been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Hanumantha Rao Vs. K. Narasimha Rao and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-30-1981
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 41, 323, 324, 406, 408, 417, 419 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 222(4), 313, 468, 468(2), 469, 473 and 478
1982CriLJ734
dismissed. Criminal - cognizance of offence - Sections 41, 323, 324, 406, 408, 417, 419 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 222 (4), 313, 468, 468 (2), 469, 473 and 478 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - … framed against them under S. 324, I.P.C. and instead found them guilty of the lesser offence punishable under Section 323, I.P.C. No conviction of the accused was however, recorded by the learned Magistrate and the learned Magistrate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVerghese Stephen Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Delhi
May-11-2007
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 216, 217, 222, 335 and 406; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 325, 407, 417, 420, 423 and 424
2007CriLJ4180
is charged under Section 407 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) with criminal breach of trust in respect of property entrusted to him … that an application for alteration of charges by addition of certain offences under Section 423 and 424 of the Indian Penal Code ought to be disposed of at the commencement of the trial itself and should not be left to … the more serious offence of Section 420 IPC. Situations such as this are covered by the provisions of Section 222 of the Code which reads as under:222. When offence proved included in offence charged.(1) When a person is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »