Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 22 · Page 1 of about 6,259 results (0.149 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 04 2006

A. Geetha Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-04-2006

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 - Sections 3(1) 3(2), 4(1), 5(1), 6(1) and 7(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 366; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22

Reported in : AIR2006SC3053; 102(2006)CLT677(SC); JT2006(8)SC389; 2006(9)SCALE6

commission of offences under Sections 3(1), 4(1), 5(1), 6(1) and 7(1) of the Act and Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The allegation against the detenu was that on 5.9.2005 at about 17.15 hours the … found no substance in the plea that one of the adverse cases related to an offence punishable under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short the 'NDPS Act') and since the same

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2021

Obalesha @ Ranga Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-08-2021

Subject : Criminal

house of CW.5- Venkatesh and forced the victim girl to marry him i.e., accused.24. However, Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as regards the concept of proving a fact, states that, ‘a fact is said to … K - HCGP) This Criminal Appeal filed under Sec.374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, by the Advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment … nothing found place on the record to disbelieve the contents at Ex.P6 22 medical certificate issued by PW.12 who is the Doctor who examined victim … S.C.No.305/2011 dated 21.10.2011 and whereby convicted the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 366 and 342 of IPC, 1860.2. Whereas, this appeal is filed seeking to set aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1992

Chief Officer, Bhavnagar Nagarpalika Vs. Meghjibhai Ugabhai and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-20-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 227; Payment of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20, 20(3), 20(3)(1), 20(4), 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - 1908; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - 1860

Reported in : (1992)2GLR847; (1995)IIILLJ527Guj

Procedure Code, 1908. It is also made a Court for the purposes of the relevant provisions contained in Indian Penal Code, 1860. It thus becomes clear that the powers conferred upon the Authority under Section 20 of the Act are … of the Act is somewhat penal in nature. This also becomes clear from the relevant provisions contained in Section 22 of the Act. Payment of wages less than the minimum rates of wages fixed under the Act to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 18 1998

Mani Vs. Jaykumari

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-18-1998

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 125, 125(1), 125(3), 421, 421(1), 431 and 466; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 22; General Clauses Act, 1893 - Sections 36

Reported in : II(1998)DMC533

property is not defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure, the definition is given in Section 22 of the Indian Penal Code. Section 22 of I.P.C contains the definition of 'movable property' and reads :'The words 'movable property' are intended … (y) words and expression used herein and not defined but defined in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Code.'25. The definition of 'movable property' given in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2026

Parveen Kumar vs Export Inspection Council & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-22-2026

Subject : Service Tax

public servant, he has referred to the definition of the expression ‘public servant’ occurring in Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the “IPC”), which is extracted here under: “21. “Public servant”.-The words “public servant” denote … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 16.01.2026% Judgment delivered on: 22.01.2026 + LPA 313/2024 PARVEEN KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Appellant in person.versusEXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. L.R.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2026

Export Inspection Council & Ors. vs Parveen Kumar & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-22-2026

Subject : Service Tax

public servant, he has referred to the definition of the expression ‘public servant’ occurring in Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the “IPC”), which is extracted here under: “21. “Public servant”.-The words “public servant” denote … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 16.01.2026% Judgment delivered on: 22.01.2026 + LPA 313/2024 PARVEEN KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Appellant in person.versusEXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. L.R.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2013

Present: Mr.K.S.Sidhu Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-16-2013

Subject : Education

and 2 had lodged the false complaint against the complainant and his sons under Sections 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short).Petitioners had made false statements in the said case and consequently, summoning order was passed in … Vashisht, Advocate for for respondent No.2. **** SABINA, J. This petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.for short) for quashing of criminal complaint No.43/ 18.8.2007 titled … 193 to 196 (both inclusive).199, 200, 205 to 211 (both inclusive) and 228, when such offence is alleged to have been committed in, or in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2018

A.m. Vs.state & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-12-2018

Subject : Education

Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) applies to the investigation or inquiry into, or trial of, all offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) or “under any other law” (Section 4), this general rule being subject to any special procedure as … basis of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) submitted on 22.05.2006, upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) no.382/2005 (Ex. PW7/B) of police station Mukherjee Nagar. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2004

Munshi Singh Gautam (D) and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-16-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 5, 20(3), 21 and 22; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 304, 313, 330 and 331; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9

Reported in : 2006ACJ1002; AIR2005SC402; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)46; 2005CriLJ320; JT2004(10)SC547; 2004(3)KLT971(SC); RLW2005(2)SC209; 2004(9)SCALE390; (2005)9SCC631

happens will be a sad day, for any one to reckon with.8. Though Sections 330 and 331 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC') make punishable those persons who cause hurt for the purpose of extorting the confession … judiciary itself, which if it happens will be a sad day, for any one to reckon with.8. Though Sections 330 and 331 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC') make punishable those persons who … police to protect the interest of the arrested person. Articles 20(3) and 22 of the Constitution further manifest the constitutional protection extended to every citizen

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2008

Collector and Dist. Magistrate and ors. Vs. S. Sultan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 3(2); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Constitution of India - Article 22

Reported in : AIR2008SC2096; JT2008(4)SC369; 2008(4)SCALE574; 2008AIRSCW2742; 2008(3)LH(SC)2248

main ground of challenge was that the grounds of detention referred to certain acts which are punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'), as well as the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (in short 'Explosive Act') and, therefore, shows … order stating it to be illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 22 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (in short the 'Constitution'). The main … writ petitions filed for quashing the order of detention passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Nellore, under Sections 3(1), 3(2) read with Section 2(a) and (g) of A.P. Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial