Advanced Search Results
Kedar and anr. Vs. State
Rajasthan
Oct-25-2005
Criminal
Rajasthan Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 5, 9, 10 and 11; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 216A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439
RLW2006(1)Raj253; 2006(1)WLC348
of a public servant, shall-(a) if such offence is punishable with death or with imprisonment for life under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act XLV of 1860) be awarded such punishment as is provided for that offence in the Code; … to in short the Act of 1986).2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offence under Section 216A IPC is bailable. Still the bail has been declined to the petitioners in view of the provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. and anr. Vs. R.S. Gupta, H.J.S., Special Judge (D.A.A.)
Allahabad
Aug-03-2002
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956 - Rules 3 and 19; Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 190(1), 195, 195(1) 340 and 350; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166, 167, 175, 176, 216A, 302, 303, 304, 307, 308, 325, 326, 327, 329, 331, 333, 363, 364, 365, 368, 369, 386, 387, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402 and 511; Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1983 - Sections 2, 3, 5 and 19
(2003)1UPLBEC312
Section 340 Cr.P.C. are two fold. Firstly; that any offence punishable under any of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely, Sections 193 to 196 (both inclusive) Sections 199, 200, 205 to 211 (both inclusive) … the scheduled attached with the Act shows that it was only in relation to offences punishable under Sections 216A, 302, 303, 304, 307, 308, 325, 326, 327, 329, 331, 333, 363, 364, 365, 368, 369, 386, 387,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Kumar Vs. Director General Prisons and ors.
Rajasthan
May-27-2005
Criminal
Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 - Rules 9 and 14; Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Act - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121 to 140, 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 332, 364, 386, 387, 388, 389, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460; Constitution of India - Article 226
RLW2005(4)Raj2255; 2005(3)WLC694
392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.Unless they have undergone (one fourth) of the sentence including remission and the Superintendent of Jail recommends the … Persons who have been convicted for offences under Sections 121 to 140, 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 332, 364, 386, 387, 388, 389, 392, 393, … 29.03.2005 has been annexed as (Annexure-R1). It is then pleaded that since the petitioner was also convicted under Sections 395/396 IPC; parole to him would be prohibited under Rule 14 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Manish Dixit Vs. Director General (Prisons) and anr.
Rajasthan
Dec-16-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121 to 130, 216A, 224, 225, 231, 232, 239, 245, 302, 303, 311, 323, 332, 333, 376, 377 and 378 to 462; Arms Act - Sections 7 and 25(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320(7) and 324; Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972 - Rules 3 and 6
RLW2005(2)Raj779; 2005(2)WLC465
232, 303, 311, 323, 332, 333, 376, 377, 383, 392 to 402, 435 to 440 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860).(e) Prisoners who have been sentenced to less than five years imprisonment.(f) Prisoners who are … been convicted of an offence of offences under Section 121 to 130, 216A, 224, 225, 231, 232, 303, 311, 323, 332, 333, 376, 377, 383, … is undergoing the sentence awarded to him in Sessions Case No. 158/1994 having being convicted for offences under Sections 302,397 and 364 I.P.C. and 7/25(1)(a) of the Arms Act. The petitioner was sentenced to life imprisonment for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParveen Kumar Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-21-2001
CriminalFood Adulteration
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-A, 216A, 302, 303, 304-B, 307, 311, 328, 364, 376, 377, 382, 386 to 389, 392 to 402, 406, 413, 455 to 460 and 498A; Good Conduct Prisoners Probational Release Act, 1926 - Sections 2 and 7; Good Conduct Prisoners Probational Release Rules, 1927 - Rule 9; Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Government of India Act - Sections 80-A(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 401
2001CriLJ4583; I(2002)DMC486
303, 311, 328, 364, 376, 377, 382, 386 to 389, 392 to 402, 413, 455 to 460 of the Indian Penal Code.(ii) The Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908.(iii) The Explosive Substances Act, 1908.(iv) The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947.(v) … the following Acts, or provisions thereof :-(i) Chapters VI and VII, Sections 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 364, 376, 377, 382, 386 to 389, 392 … 226/227 of the Constitution of India, he has prayed for the grant of conditional release on licence under Section 2 of Good Conduct Prisoners Probational Release Act, 1926 read with Rules of 1927.Facts :2. Parveen Kumar-petitioner, his
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Kailash Nath Agarwal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-16-1973
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337, 337(1), 338; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120(B), 161, 165, 165A, 216A, 369, 401, 420, 435, 435(1), 467, 468, 471 and 477A
AIR1973SC2210; 1973CriLJ1196; (1973)1SCC751; [1973]3SCR728
following sections of the Indian Penal Code, namely, Sections 161, 165, 165A, 216A, 369, 401, 435 and 477A, the District Magistrate, a Presidency Magistrate, a … Accordingly a chargesheet was filed against respondents 1 to under Sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.5. The inquiry proceedings were started in the Court of the First Class Magistrate, Kanpur, as the case was … consideration in this appeal by the State of U.P. on certificate is-whether a District Magistrate is competent under Section 337(1) of the CrPC to grant pardon to an accused person when a First Class Magistrate, before whom
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShivasubramanyam Vs. State Through Chamarajanagar East Police Station
Karnataka
Jan-30-2002
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438 and 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 212 and 216A
2002CriLJ1998; 2002(3)KarLJ280
costs. Criminal - bail - Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 34 and 212 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petitioner arrested by police for offences punishable under Section 212 read with Section 34 - petitioner knocked
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jan-04-2002
Criminal
Rajasthan Prisoners (Release on Parole) Rules, 1958 - Rule 14; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 21
2002(2)WLN615
392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860: Unless they have undergone one forth of the sentence including remission and the Superintendent of Jail recommends the … from the Jail or Police custody or attempted to escape;(d) Persons who have been convicted for offences under Sections 121 to 140, 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 332, 364, 386, 387, 388, 389, 392, 393, 394, 395,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jan-15-2002
Criminal
Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 - Rule 14; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302
[2002(94)FLR988]; RLW2003(1)Raj246; 2002(3)WLN61; 2002(3)WLN61
389, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860: unless they have undergone one fourth of the sentence including remission and the Superintendent of Jail recommends the … persons who have been convicted for offences under Sections 121 to 140, 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 332, 364, 386, 387, 388, 389, 392, 393, … Adampur District-Hissar (Haryana). He was arrested in September, 1995. He was tried on the charge for offence under Section 302 I.P.C. Learned Sessions Judge, Jalore by judgment dated 29.1.1999 convicted him for offence under Section 302 I.P.C.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarath Vishnu, vs State of Kerala,
Kerala
Jan-23-2024
for allegedly committing the offencespunishable under Sections 394, 395, 399, 411, 412, 414, 201, 109, 216A, 120B of the Indian Penal Code,1860. The petitioner was arrested on 13.12.2023.2. The gist of the prosecution, is that: On 15.12.2021, around 5.30 … THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- Dated this the 23rd day of January,2024ORDERThe application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the 20 th accusedin Crime No.992/2021 of Kasaba Police
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »