Advanced Search Results

State of Maharashtra Vs. L.D. Kanchan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1 and 2); Banking Regulation Act - Sections 46A and 51; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 14 and 51; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Amendment Act, 1980; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21(12) and 161

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR59; [1991]72CompCas632(Bom)

a nationalised bank is not a 'public servant' within the meaning of clause (12)(b) of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, are quashed and set aside. Rule in each of the criminal revision application is, accordingly, made absolute. Company

S.S. Dhanoa Vs. Municipal Corporation, Delhi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Bombay Cooperative Societies Act, 1925 - Sections 10 and 23; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 19(2); All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968 - Rule 2; All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rule 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197; Companies Act; Societies Registration Act; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 12A

Reported in : AIR1981SC1395; 1981CriLJ871; [1981(43)FLR272]; (1981)IILLJ230SC; (1981)IILLJ231SC; 1981(1)SCALE919; (1981)3SCC431; [1981]3SCR864; 1981(13)LC803(SC)

(hereinafter called the Society), was a public servant within the meaning of Clause Twelfth of Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for purposes of Section 197 of the CrPC, 1973. The question arises in this way.2. The appellant is

State of Gujarat And Anr. Vs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.A. Mehta (Retd) An ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Gujarat Lokayukta Act 1986 - Sections 2(8), 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 21; Constitution of India - Article 217

Reported in : 2013(1)SCALE7; 2013(1)SCJ1; 2013(1)KLT46(SN); AIR2013SCW671; AIR2013SC693

term, “Public servant”, as having the same meaning, that has been given to it, under Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.Section 3 (1) of the Act, 1986, reads as under:“For the purpose of conducting investigations in accordance with

State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.A. Mehta (Retd) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Gujarat Lokayukta Act 1986 - Sections 2(8), 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 21; Constitution of India - Article 217

term, “Public servant”, as having the same meaning, that has been given to it, under Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.Section 3 (1) of the Act, 1986, reads as under:“For the purpose of conducting investigations in accordance with

Naresh Kumar Madan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalElectricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 5(1), 12, 15, 65, 66, 78, 78A and 81; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(1), 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Prevention of Corruptions Act, 1947; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act

Reported in : AIR2008SC385; [2007(3)JCR146(SC)]; JT2007(5)SC544; 2007(2)KLT539(SC); RLW2007(3)SC2184; 2007(5)SCALE510; (2007)4SCC766; 2007LawHerald(SC)1492; 2007(3)KCCRSN128(SC); 2007(4)SCC766; (2007)2SCC(Cri)404; (2007)2Crimes260(SC);

Act - No reason to interfere with the decision of High Court - Appeal dismissed;Criminal-Public servant-Definition-Section 21 of Indian Penal Code, 1860-Provisions within the meaning of Section 21 denotes various persons to be public servants held not exhaustive- A person

Shantaram Balya Sankhe and ors. Vs. Kaliram Gajanan Sankhe and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 151, 197 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 34, 427, 447, 452, 504 and 506(2); Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 184; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 227 and 254(2); Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 343; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 - Sections 23(7) and 45; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 161

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)640; (2001)1BOMLR640

accordance with law.Writ to be sent immediately. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 197 r/w Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 184 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Public servants - Government sanction for prosecution

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. V. Vasudeva Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 161, 165 and 165A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 114

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)1030; 2004(1)BLJR357; 2004CriLJ620; JT2003(9)SC119; 2004(1)KLT526(SC); (2004)9SCC319; 2004(1)LC580(SC)

referred to as the 'accused') who faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'') and Section 5(2) read with Section 5 (1) (d) of the Act. He was … as such between the period 31.1.1988 to 8.6.1988 and was thus a public servant within the meaning of Section 21 IPC. Complainant-D. Raghunath was working as Inspector of Weights and Measures at Warangal between August 1985 to April

Suresh Kumar Koushal and anr. Vs. Naz Foundation and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

respondent No.1 herein, by way of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in the following terms:“We declare that Section 377 IPC, insofar it criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults … that Section 377 IPC, insofar it criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults in private, is violative of Articles 21, 14 and 15 of the Constitution. The provisions of Section 377 IPC will continue to govern non-consensual penile

Sh. S.K. Muttoo and Others Vs. State and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 110, 120-B, 191, 192, 193, 211 and 465; Societies Registration Act, 1860; CCS (CCA) Conduct Rules, 1956 - Rule 11; CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 11

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT394; 2002(61)DRJ146

others together with order dated 11th may 2000, is quashed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482--Quashing of complaint--Accused summoned to face trial of the … registered under the Societies Registration Act, XXI of 1860 at Delhi. The Institute is run by its … So, the petitioner who are its employees, cannot be said to be 'public servant' within the meaning of section 21 IPC.7. In short, the case of respondent No.2 complainant in complaint is that two nothings dated 2nd September … here. Offence under Section 120--B is relateable to said two offences. Case of forgery punishable under Section 465 IPC is not made out. During the course of arguments the respondent No. 2--complainant was unable to point out … memorandum the petitioner No.1 (Director) had declared his intention to impose minor penalty of censure under Rule 11 of CCS (CCA) Conduct Rules, 1956 while

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Appasaheb Balajee Parkhe and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

of her husband. As such, definition of the term “cruelty” also assumes importance. Explanation to Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, defines “cruelty”. It would be proper to reproduce Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code as respondents / … by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In the matter of PrithvirajV/s. State of Rajasthan reported in 2004 Cri. L.J., 2190, the Rajasthan High Court has held thus in paragraph Nos. 21 to 27: 21. “Circumstantial evidence may be