Advanced Search Results

Nova Steels (India) Ltd. Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 482 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 206, 403, 406 and 421

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)238; 86(2000)DLT159

The case dealt with the determination of ingredients of an offence in the complaint under Section 421 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - In the instant case, the respondent had filed a complaint under Sections 206 and 403, 406 and

R.G. Holdings Private Limited Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 86 and 129A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(5), 2(14), 2(26), 2(28), 2(33), 2(35), 3, 4, 13, 39, 40, 46, 56, 60, 66, 66(1), 68, 79, 88(4), 88(12), 127, 130, 130(3), 130(4), 132, 133, 134, 137, 138, 138(1), 146, 147(3), 158, 158(2), 158(3), 159, 177, 181, 184, 192, 192(A), 196, 197, 200, 202, 202(2), 206, 206(1), 206(2), 207, 207(1), 207(2) and 208; Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 - Rule 139; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 34 and 147; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 66; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 26, 258, 259, 379 and 464; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4(2) and 5

person in charge of a motor vehicle is a false document within the meaning of Section 464 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860) seize the mark or document and call upon the driver or owner of the vehicle … driver, he could make proper arrangement for temporary custody of the vehicle.31. The next two important provisions are Section 206 which deals with impounding of documents by a Police Officer or persons authorized by the State Government and

A. Bhaskaran Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 91, 165(7), 167(5), 205, 206, 305 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420, 468 and 471; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1) and 5(2); ;West Bengal (Amendment) Act, 1988; ;Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (1996)1CALLT385(HC)

or (ii) any case exclusively triable by a Court of Session or a case under Chapter XVIII of the Indian Penal Code, (45 of 1860) the investigation is not concluded within a period of three years, or (iii)any case other … read with section 205 Cr.P.C. He has also referred to the provision contained in some other sections like section 206, section 305 and some other provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. It is also his contention that the

Rama Rao and anr. Vs. Narayan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCriminal

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 95 and 146; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 172 188, 195(1) 195(2), 196 197, 198, 198-A and 476-B; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 20, 177, 193, 194, 195, 196, 199, 200, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 228, 409, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 471, 475, 475, 476, 477 and 477-A; Evidence Act - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1969SC724; (1969)71BOMLR696; 1969CriLJ1064; 1969MhLJ597(SC); (1969)1SCC167; [1969]3SCR185

210, 211, 228, 409, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 471, 475, 476, 477 and 477-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3 of Indian Evidence Act - Nagpur District Land Development Bank Ltd. registered as society - … 172 to 188, I.P. Code offences against public justice under Sections 193, 194, 195, 196, 199, 200, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211 and 228, when such offences are alleged to have been committed in or

Moreshwar Savey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act - Sections 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 11, 11(1), 145, 161, 169, 173(8), 190, 193, 226, 227, 228, 233, 234, 234(1), 397, 460 and 482; General Clauses Act 1897 - Sections 10 and 21; Delhi Special Police Establisment Act, 1946; Evidence Act - Sections 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114, 120A, 120-B, 141, 147, 149, 153-A-B, 201, 295, 295-A, 297, 323, 332, 336, 337, 338, 342, 379, 391, 390, 392, 394, 395, 397, 406, 408, 409, 427 and 505; Ayodhya Act, 1993; Limitation Act 1908; Companies Act - Sections 630; Constitution of India - Article 216, 233 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1765

in the Schedule below :SCHEDULE1. Case relating to Crime No. 198/92 under Sections 153A, 153B and 505 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, P.S. Ram Janam Bhumi, Ayodhya, district Faizabad, State v. Sri Ashok Senghal and others.10. Before the Court of … (Moreshwar Savey v. State of U.P. and another) the revisionist is to be charged with offences punishable Under Sections 147, 153A, 153B, 295, 295A, 505 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to … IPC.(3) Crime No. 205 of 1992 under Section 394, IPC.(4) Crime No. 206 of 1992 under Section 392, IPC.(5) Crime No. 207 of 1992 under

Dawood vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

in S.T.No.1921/2007, convicting and sentencing the revision petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 292 (2) (e) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Relevant facts:2. The prosecution case is that, on 17.03.2007,at about 9.00 p.m., the Sub Inspector of Police (PW4) … THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 3RD ASWINA, 1945 CRL.REV.PET NO. 3 OF 2011AGAINST THE JUDGMENT CRA 206/2009 OF THE SESSIONS COURT,PALAKKAD IN ST NO.1921/2007 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - III,PALAKKAD REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: DAWOOD,

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

No.3480/2015, have been summoned for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sectionsread with Section 32 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act-2003, hereinafter referred to as COTPA2003 and proceedings

In Re: Basappa Shivappa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1917)19BOMLR535; 41Ind.Cas.100

so liable, makes it over to another person, does not commit an offence punishable under Section 206 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. - MAHARASHTRA SCHEDULED CASTES, SCHEDULED TRIBES, DE-NOTIFIED TRIBES (VIMUKTA JATIS), NOMADIC TRIBES, OTHER BACKWARD CLASSES AND SPECIAL BACKWARD

Nidhan Biswas and ors. Vs. State of Tripura

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32, 32(1) and 113A; Probation of the Offenders' Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 174, 174(3), 176, 176(4), 313 and 360; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 206, 304B, 306 and 498A

found her husband, mother-in-law and husband's elder brother guilty of offence punishable under Sections 306 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (for short, 'IPC'). They have been convicted accordingly with sentence of imprisonment and fine by the learned Addl. … her husband. 19. The Supreme Court has observed that by introduction of Section 113-A in the Evidence Act, Section 206, IPC has acquired wider dimensions and has become a serious marriage related offence. Under certain conditions, the Court

The Municipality of Chopda Vs. Motilal Manekchand and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 265 and 276; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 - Sections 46(1), 59, 59(1) and 167-A; Professions Tax Limitation Act, 1941 - Sections 2; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 142-A; Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 168; Bombay Civil Service Conduct, Discpline and Appeal Rules - Rules 3 and 21; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 206

Reported in : AIR1958Bom487; (1958)60BOMLR48; ILR1958Bom483

of Bombay, : AIR1951Bom233 (D), this Court held that the expression 'trade,' as used in Section 168 of the Indian Penal Code and Rule 21 of the Bombay Civil Service Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, must be construed in a … of a right invested in the party doing those acts.' It is true that the words used in Section 206 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, as it stood when the Jalgaon Borough Municipality's case was decided,