Advanced Search Results

Ravindra Reddy Vs. Shaik Masthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 109, 201, 302, 364 and 404

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD(Cri)896; JT2008(13)SC622; 2008(11)SCALE128; 2008AIRSCW5791; 2008(4)LH(SC)2935

2 were tried for offences punishable under Sections 364, 302, 404 and 201 read with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') There was another person described as A-3 who also faced trial alongwith them. The

Shyamal Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC)1860 - Sections 302, 201, 379, 411, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC),(CrPC) 1973 - Section 164, 161, 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 8

Shyamal Ghosh, were charged with offences under Sections 302, 201, 379, 411 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short, the 'IPC'). All these accused were found to be guilty of the offences with which they

Suresh Sakharam Nangare Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 302, 201, 34

and charges were framed against the accused persons under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘the IPC’).(f) During trial before the Court of Sessions, Shabbir Fariyad Khan turned approver and by

Shankar Narayan Bhadolkar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 6, 34, 76 to 106, 201, 299, 300, 302, 304 and 304A; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 25(1A); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC1966; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)1020; 2004CriLJ1778; JT2004(3)SC211; 2004(3)SCALE78; (2005)9SCC71; 2004(2)LC861(SC)

trial. They were charged for commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Appellant was alternatively charged for commission of offence punishable under Section 302, 201 and

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Manmatharaj

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302

Reported in : AIR2009SC1757; 2009AIRSCW1322; 2009(3)LHSC1958; 2009(3)KCCRSN85

to as the `accused') who was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC').2. Prosecution version in a nutshell is as follows:The accused is a resident of Chockalingapuram.

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Zavad Zama Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 14; Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302;

Reported in : AIR1984SC1095; 1984CriLJ922; 1984(2)Crimes1(SC); 1984(1)SCALE938; (1984)3SCC505; [1984]3SCR789; 1984(16)LC964(SC)

offence of murder punishable under Section 302 and of causing disappearance of evidence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in connection with the communal riots that occurred in the Moradabad city. On November 6, 1982, the District

State of Karnataka Vs. Madesha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 106 and 201

Reported in : 104(2007)CLT799(SC); JT2007(10)SC54; 2007(9)SCALE523; (2007)7SCC35; 2007LawHerald(SC)2412

Court directing acquittal of the respondents.2. In this appeal, a notice limited to applicability of Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') was issued by this Court. The High Court came to the conclusion that Section

N. Somashekar (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 304, 341 and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164 and 174

Reported in : RLW2004(3)SC398; 2004(5)SCALE383; (2004)11SCC334

as 'accused') was prosecuted for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 341, 302, 201 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). He was acquitted by the Trial Court. He was, however, convicted by the impugned judgment … Trial court. The High Court held the accused guilty of offences punishable under Section 304 )part II) and Section 201 IPC. For the first offence the accused was sentenced to undergo imprisonment of three years and a fine

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Ram Veer Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302;

Reported in : AIR2007SC3075; 2007(10)SCALE545; 2007AIRSCW5553; (2007)3Crimes399(SC)

setting aside the conviction of the respondents for offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the Act') and Section 201, IPC. Each of the respondents was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for

Byvarapu Raju Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : AIR2007SC1904; 2007CriLJ3204; RLW2007(4)SC3071; 2007(8)SCALE95; 2007(2)LC739(SC); 2007AIRSCW3414; JT2007(8)SC177; 2007(4)KCCRSN298;

Andhra Pradesh High Court holding the appellant guilty of offences punishable under Section 302 and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Before the High Court challenge was to the judgment of the learned IInd Additional