Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 2 · Page 1 of about 22,089 results (0.193 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Feb 01 2005

Kamesh Panjiyar @ Kamlesh Panjiyar Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-01-2005

Subject : Criminal Family

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A, 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983

Reported in : AIR2005SC785; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)575; 2005(1)BLJR311; 2005CriLJ1418; I(2005)DMC321SC; JT2005(2)SC218; (2005)2SCC388; 2005(1)LC390(SC)

learned Single Judge of the Patna High Court upholding his conviction for offences punishable under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), while reducing sentence to seven years rigorous imprisonment from ten years imprisonment as was … have caused her death.Explanation - For the purpose of this sub-section 'dowry' shall have same meaning as in Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961).(2) Whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2008

Ashfaq Khan and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-01-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420 and 424; Trade Tax Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167

Reported in : 2008AIRSCW897; 2008CriLJ1598; JT2008(2)SC157; 2008(2)SCALE156; (2008)11SCC143

Report (in short the 'FIR') lodged for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 and 424 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti- Social Activities (Prevention) … for quashing the First Information Report (in short the 'FIR') lodged for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 and 424 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Sections 2 and 3

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2004

Mehboob Dawood Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 57, 167, 167(2), 309, 437, 437(1), 437(2), 437(5), 439, 439(1) and 439(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 295A, 302, 307, 427 and 435; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(4)

Reported in : 2004(3)ALT11(SC); 2004CriLJ1359; 2004(2)KLT812(SC); 2004(1)SCALE418; (2004)2SCC362; 2004(2)LC795(SC); AIR 2004 SC 2890

which was in relation to offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149, 295A, 427, 435 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Section 25(4) of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short the 'Arms Act'). The … fact that all the co-accused persons were released on bail. The application was numbered as Criminal Application No. 2335 of 2003. When the matter was taken up, an affidavit was filed by one Gajanan Rajaram Huddedar, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Sep 19 2008

Daulatram S/O Sadram Teli Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-19-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 352; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4587; 2008(12)SCALE608; 2008AIRSCW6273; 2008(5)LH(SC)3775.

Raipur, in S.T. No. 53/2000 who found the appellant guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') and Section 3(2)(v) of the Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2005

Harjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304, 304B, 306 and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1986 - Sections 113A, 113B and 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 215

Reported in : AIR2006SC680; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)316; 2006CriLJ554; I(2006)DMC11SC; [2006(1)JCR157(SC)]; JT2005(10)SC399; (2006)1SCC463

material on record is sufficient for Court to form an opinion that accused might have committed the offence. INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 [C.A. No. 45/1860]. Section 420; Framing of charge Held, Presence of material on record is sufficient for Court … have caused her death.Explanation.- For the purpose of this sub-section, 'dowry' shall have the same meaning as in Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961).(2) Whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2004

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Raj Gopal Asawa and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-17-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR2004SC1933; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)642; 2004CriLJ1791; I(2004)DMC586SC; JT2004(3)SC560; 2004(3)SCALE339; (2004)4SCC470

for which the Trial Court had convicted them i.e. offences punishable under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (for short 'the IPC'). Three persons faced trial relating to the alleged suicidal death of one Mangala (hereinafter … have caused her death.Explanation - For the purpose of this sub-section 'dowry' shall have same meaning as in Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961).(2) Whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2003

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. V. Vasudeva Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-13-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 161, 165 and 165A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 114

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)1030; 2004(1)BLJR357; 2004CriLJ620; JT2003(9)SC119; 2004(1)KLT526(SC); (2004)9SCC319; 2004(1)LC580(SC)

referred to as the 'accused') who faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'') and Section 5(2) read with Section 5 (1) (d) of the Act. He was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2009

State of Punjab Vs. Nirmal Kaur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 401

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1535; JT2009(8)SC303; 2009(4)LC1878(SC)

On the accusation of commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Act investigation was undertaken, charges

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2007

Naresh Kumar Madan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-10-2007

Subject : CriminalElectricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 5(1), 12, 15, 65, 66, 78, 78A and 81; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(1), 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Prevention of Corruptions Act, 1947; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act

Reported in : AIR2008SC385; [2007(3)JCR146(SC)]; JT2007(5)SC544; 2007(2)KLT539(SC); RLW2007(3)SC2184; 2007(5)SCALE510; (2007)4SCC766; 2007LawHerald(SC)1492; 2007(3)KCCRSN128(SC); 2007(4)SCC766; (2007)2SCC(Cri)404; (2007)2Crimes260(SC);

Act - No reason to interfere with the decision of High Court - Appeal dismissed;Criminal-Public servant-Definition-Section 21 of Indian Penal Code, 1860-Provisions within the meaning of Section 21 denotes various persons to be public servants held not exhaustive- A person … proposition, it may be necessary to construe the definition of the term 'public servant' occurring in the relevant statutes.Section 2(1)(c) of the 1988 Act defines 'public servant' in the following terms:c) 'public servant' means-(i) any person in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2007

Shivu and anr. Vs. R.G. High Court of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-13-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 366 and 374(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 376

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1806; JT2007(3)SC332; 2007(3)SCALE157; (2007)4SCC713; 2007AIRSCW1808; (2007)2SCC(Cri)686; (2007)2Crimes24(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)900.

sentence awarded to the appellants in respect of offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and sentence of 10 years and fine of Rs. 25,000/- with default stipulation for the … of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and sentence of 10 years and fine of Rs. 25,000/- with default stipulation for the offence punishable under Section 376 read with Section 34 IPC awarded by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.