Advanced Search Results
M S Leela Vs. State By
Karnataka
Dec-22-2021
Criminal
the prosecution and even on close scrutiny of evidence, it is required to refer Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. It is well- known principle of law that reliance can be based on the solitary … dated 12.08.2011, whereby convicted the accused for the offences punishable under Section 323, 324 and 304 (2) of IPC, 1860. The accused is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay … - HCGP ) This Criminal Appeal filed under Sec.374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, by the Advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment … aside the judgment of Fast Track Court, at Srirangapatna, dated 12.08.2011 and 17.08.2011 in S.C.No.174/2008. 2 This criminal appeal coming on for final hearing this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirectorate of Enforcement vs.abdullah Ali Balsharaf & Ors.
Delhi
Mar-15-2019
Land Acquisition
Bureau of Investigation had also registered a case for offences under section 420 read with section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) read with provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and in this background, it was essential … of powers under the general provisions of section 102 CrPC instead of acting under the stricter provisions of section 17 of the PMLA ?.12. It would be beneficial at this point to set-out the provisions referred to above
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaya Devi and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Dec-07-2015
Land Acquisition
the basis of the said complaint, FIR No.466 of 1966 was registered under Sections 498A, 304B, 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘the IPC’). After investigation, charges under Sections 498A and 304B read with Section 34 of the … Mahavir, resident of House No.36, Type II, M.D. University Campus, Rohtak according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 17.07.1994. After 20-25 days of the solemnization of the marriage, Karamvir (appellant No.2 herein), his mother Maya Devi (appellant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohamed Ali Jinnah vs National Investigation Agency
Delhi
Jun-03-2026
Right to Information
custody parole in FIR No. RC-14/2022/NIA/DLI dated 13.04.2022 registered at PS.: NIA, New Delhi under Sections 120B/153A of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (IPC) read with Sections 17/18/18B/22B/38/29 of UAPA for a period of 06 hours on 15.06.2026 excluding the … Rohilla, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 03.06.20261. By virtue of the present appeal under Section 21(4) of the NationalInvestigation Agency, Act, 2008, the appellant seeks setting aside of the orderdated 09.04.2026, passed by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSakshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-26-2004
CivilConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15(3), 17, 18, 19, 20(1), 21 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 375, 376, 376(2), 376A to 376D, 377, 506 and 511; ;Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35 and 35(2); Customs Act - Sections 104; ;Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(1); Offences against Person Act, 1861 - Sections 18, 20, 42 and 47; ;Aliens Control Act, 1991 - Sections 25(5); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(1), 167(2), 273, 327(1), 327(2) and 715.1
AIR2004SC3566; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)504; 2004(2)BLJR1378; 98(2004)CLT491(SC); 2004CriLJ2881; 112(2004)DLT457(SC); 2004(77)DRJ390; RLW2004(3)SC402; 2004(6)SCALE15; (2004)5SCC518; 2004 INSC383
set out in prayer (A) aforesaid as offences under Section 375, 376 and 376A to 376D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860;C) Issue such other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem appropriate in the present facts … Child adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 20th February, 1989 and especially to Articles 17(e) and 19 thereof, which read as under :Article 17States Parties recognise the important function performed by the mass
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan versus State of (Nct of Delhi) & Others
Supreme Court of India
Jul-29-2025
[2025] 7 S.C.R. 2012
on 17.02.2002, FIR No.192/2002 was registered at P.S. Kavi Nagar, District Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh under Section 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, “IPC”) on the basis of a complaint filed by Smt. Nilam Katara i.e. complainant and mother of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.M. Uttappa Vs. K.U. Sumi
Karnataka
Aug-28-2008
Criminal
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 5, 5(1), 9, 11 and 17; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 494 and 495; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320; Hindu Mitakshara Law
2009CriLJ639; ILR2008KAR4963
application as part of the order.36. Accordingly, the Revision Petition stands disposed of, in terms of the settlement. INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860, SECTION 494 - Offence under-Conviction - Confirmed in appeal - Revision against - Proof of bigamy - HELD, From … marriage is not proved in accordance with the customs, the offence punishable either under Section 494 IPC or Section 17 of the Hindu Marriage Act cannot be held to be proved.12. In support of his contentions, he relied
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Narayan Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa and anr.
Orissa
Nov-22-1994
Criminal
Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 16 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 374; Constitution of India - Article 23(1)
1995CriLJ1788
in disposed of or served for mothers' benefit? (See Bailey v. Alabana) (1911) 219 U.S. 207. Section 374 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') makes unlawful compulsory labour punishable in law. Unlawfully compelling any person to labour against the … ORDERA. Pasayat, J.1. Order of learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jaypore (in short SDM) directing institution of the case under Section 17 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (in short the 'Act') was assailed before the revisional forum,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMariappan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India
Apr-18-2013
Criminal
her house over a land dispute by the appellant-accused, claiming the plea of insanity under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘the IPC’). Parvathi @ Kili (the deceased), her husband Parasivam Chettiar (PW-6) and their grand daughters … P. Sathasivam, J. 1) This appeal has been filed against the final judgment and order dated 17.10.2006 passed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 1556 of 2003, whereby
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMariyappan Vs. State of T.Nadu
Supreme Court of India
Apr-18-2013
Criminal
her house over a land dispute by the appellant-accused, claiming the plea of insanity under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘the IPC’). Parvathi @ Kili (the deceased), her husband Parasivam Chettiar (PW-6) and their grand daughters … .... Respondent(s) 2 JUDGMENT P.Sathasivam, J.1) This appeal has been filed against the final judgment and order dated 17.10.2006 passed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No.1556 of 2003, whereby the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »