Advanced Search Results

Shri Shiv Kirpal Singh Vs. Shri V.V. Giri

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationElection

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 44, 171A, 171B, 171C, 171C(1), 171C(2), 171C(3), 171F, 171G and 499; Contract Act - Sections 16;

Reported in : AIR1970SC2097; (1970)2SCC567; [1971]2SCR197

papers - Sections 44, 171-A, 171-B, 171-C, 171-C (1), 171-C (2), 171-C (3), 171-F, 171-G and 499 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 16 of Indian Contract Act - election petition filed to challenge election of respondent on various

Tulsiram Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 9A; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 11(1), 13(2) and 16(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 and 276

Reported in : AIR1985SC299; 1984CriLJ1731; 1985(1)Crimes313(SC); 1985MPLJ127(SC); 1984(2)SCALE578; (1984)4SCC487; [1985]1SCR949

13 (2) and 16 (1) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Sections 272 and 276 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant accused of adulterating soyabean oil convicted by Magistrate under Section 16 (1) (a) (i) - appeal

Virender Yadav @ Vicky @ Chhotu Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 397, 307, 186, 353, 120B, 34, 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313; Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 - Section 7A(2)

the judgment dated 31.07.2009, by which the appellant was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 397 Indian Penal Code, 1860 in case FIR No.17/2005 registered at police station Ashok Vihar and has further challenged the sentence order of … ASI Ram Bhau, PW-11 Ct.Deen Dayal, PW-12 ASI Rohtash Singh and PW-15 SI Sukh Ram Pal (Investigating officer). 16. PW-5 Ms.Archana Sinha, learned MM had conducted the TIP proceedings of appellant Virender and accused Ajay on 13.01.2005.

Vijay @ Rinku vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

in Sessions Case No.114/2010 arising out of FIR No.532/2007, registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar under Sections 364/392/302/201/411/120B/202/216 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 1 of 89 referred to as “IPC”) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence … District Courts, Rohini in Sessions Case No.114/2010 arising out of FIR No.532/2007, registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar under Sections 364/392/302/201/411/120B/202/216 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 1 of 89 referred to as “IPC”) whereby … i.e. the appellant herein S/o Sh. Harshwardhan assailing the impugned judgment dated 16.07.2012 and impugned order on sentence dated 20.07.2012 passed by the District Judge

Sarvjeet vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

FIR No.25/2010 u/s 302/304B/498A IPC, PS Moti Nagar, convicting the appellant for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟) and order on sentence dated 28.02.2011 sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life along with a fine … fell from the bed and suffered injuries. Immediately I called my father in law and brother in law.” 16. There is yet another version of the injuries sustained by the deceased that was suggested by the appellant

B.M. Rao Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 21, 226, 227, 331 and 311(2); Gujarat State Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1971 - Rules 3(1), 6, 7, 9 and 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 95

Reported in : (2005)1GLR481

Chief Engineer, on 8 years old trivial and trifle and stale matter, is, self-eloquent. Even Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, provides no criminal action in such trifle and trivial matters. Such a discriminatory action, approved or affirmed, on … of Consideration by imposing token minor punishment adopting highly discriminatory action and approach while exonerating all the rest 16 such officers similarly charged and similarly situated. This is the subtractrum from pioneering concised profile of old, on-going

Sri Narayan Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 16 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 374; Constitution of India - Article 23(1)

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1788

in disposed of or served for mothers' benefit? (See Bailey v. Alabana) (1911) 219 U.S. 207. Section 374 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') makes unlawful compulsory labour punishable in law. Unlawfully compelling any person to labour against the … bonded labour system, or compel any person to render any bonded labour or other form of forced labour. Section 16 makes enforcement of bonded labour punishable and any person who compels another to render any bonded labour is

Manian Transports and Others Vs. S. Krishna Moorthy, Income-tax Office ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 5, 58A(5) and 58A(6); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 276C(1), 277 and 278B; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 196 and 420

Reported in : [1991]191ITR1(Mad)

against under sections 277 and 278 in respect of returns furnished in 1971. Similarly, section 193 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, deals with punishment for intentionally giving false evidence. Section 196 deals with corruptly using any evidence as genuine … FAC 201. The questions posed therein were : (1) Whether, in view of the substantive sentence provided in section 16 of the Prevention of food Adulteration Act, while the company is a juristic person, it cannot suffer substantive

Prithipal Singh Etc. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 rw 34, 120B, 364 rw 34, 201 rw 34, 365, 220; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) 1973 - Section 161, 173 (8), 386(e), 397 rw 401, 401(4), 377, 306, 342, 337, 197, 313, 464; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ; Evidence Act - Section 133 rw 114, 114, 134, 106; Oaths Act - Section 5

Reported in : 2011(4)KLT129(SN); 2012(1)SCC10; 2012(1)SCC(Cr)1; AIR2012SCW594; AIR2012SC1594

- appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 528 of 2009 and one Amarjit Singh, ASI, under Sections 302/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as `IPC'), and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of … Jaspal Singh, DSP - appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 528 of 2009 and one Amarjit Singh, ASI, under Sections 302/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as `IPC'), and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life … 2073-SB of 2005, 2074-SB of 2005, 2075-SB of 2005 and order dated 16.10.2007 in Crl. R.P. No. 323 of 2006, whereby the High Court has

State (Union of India (Uoi)) Vs. Ram Saran

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalService

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 3(1), 9, 10 and 16(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4(1), 4(2), 5, 11, 12, 13 and 251; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 36; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 39

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR447]; [2004(2)JCR220(SC)]; JT2003(9)SC578; 2003(10)SCALE454; (2003)12SCC578

of the Act could be applied. Section 4(2) of the Code permits action under any law other than the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'). Section 5 refers to absence of a specific provision to the contrary in any … that the expression 'in the absence of a specific provision to the contrary' used therein did not render Section 16(2) of the Act redundant.2. At this juncture, it would be necessary to take note of the factual position.3.